Multi-modal risk factors differentiate suicide attempters from ideators in military veterans with major depressive disorder

Kim E Goldstein,Robert H Pietrzak,Katelyn N Challman,King-Wai Chu,Kevin D Beck,Lisa A Brenner,Alejandro Interian,Catherine E Myers,Keith M Shafritz,Philip R Szeszko,Marianne Goodman,M Mehmet Haznedar,Erin A Hazlett
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.09.149
2024-09-26
Abstract:Background: The suicide rate for United States military veterans is 1.5× higher than that of non-veterans. To meaningfully advance suicide prevention efforts, research is needed to delineate factors that differentiate veterans with suicide attempt/s, particularly in high-risk groups, e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD), from those with suicidal ideation (no history of attempt/s). The current study aimed to identify clinical, neurocognitive, and neuroimaging variables that differentiate suicide-severity groups in veterans with MDD. Methods: Sixty-eight veterans with a DSM-5 diagnosis of MDD, including those with no ideation or suicide attempt (N = 21; MDD-SI/SA), ideation-only (N = 17; MDD + SI), and one-or-more suicide attempts (N = 30; MDD + SA; aborted, interrupted, actual attempts), participated in this study. Participants underwent a structured diagnostic interview, neurocognitive assessment, and 3 T-structural/diffusion tensor magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI). Multinomial logistic regression models were conducted to identify variables that differentiated groups with respect to the severity of suicidal behavior. Results: Relative to veterans with MDD-SI/SA, those with MDD + SA had significantly higher left cingulum fractional anisotropy, decreased attentional control on emotional-Stroop, and faster response time with intact accuracy on Go/No-Go. Relative to MDD + SI, MDD + SA had higher left cingulum fractional anisotropy and faster response time with intact accuracy on Go/No-Go. Limitations: Findings are based on retrospective, cross-sectional data and cannot identify causal relationships. Also, a healthy control group was not included given the study's focus on differentiating suicide profiles in MDD. Conclusions: This study suggests that MRI and neurocognition differentiate veterans with MDD along the suicide-risk spectrum and could inform suicide-risk stratification and prevention efforts in veterans and other vulnerable populations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?