Cognitive functioning and falls in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Daina L Sturnieks,Lloyd Ly Chan,Maria Teresa Espinoza Cerda,Carmen Herrera Arbona,Beatriz Herrero Pinilla,Paula Santiago Martinez,Nigel Wei Seng,Natassia Smith,Jasmine C Menant,Stephen R Lord
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2024.105638
Abstract:Objective: To identify which cognitive functions and specific neuropsychological assessments predict falls in older people living in the community. Methods: Five electronic databases were searched until 30/08/2022 for studies assessing the association between specific cognitive functions and faller status (prospective and retrospective), in community-dwelling older people. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analyses synthesised the evidence regarding the associations between different neurocognitive subdomains and faller status. Results: Thirty-eight studies (20 retrospective, 18 prospective) involving 37,101 participants were included. All but one study was rated high or medium quality. Meta-analyses were performed with data from 28 studies across 11 neurocognitive subdomains and four specific neuropsychological tests. Poor cognitive flexibility, processing speed, free recall, working memory and sustained attention were significantly associated with faller status, but poor verbal fluency, visual perception, recognition memory, visuo-constructional reasoning and language were not. The Trail Making Test B was found to have the strongest association with faller status. Conclusion: Poor performance in neurocognitive subdomains spanning processing speed, attention, executive function and aspects of memory are associated with falls in older people, albeit with small effect sizes. The Trail Making Test, a free-to-use, simple assessment of processing speed and mental flexibility, is recommended as the cognitive screening test for fall risk in older people.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?