Comparison of Different HIV-1 Resistance Interpretation Tools for Next-Generation Sequencing in Italy

Daniele Armenia,Luca Carioti,Valeria Micheli,Isabella Bon,Tiziano Allice,Celestino Bonura,Bianca Bruzzone,Fiorenza Bracchitta,Francesco Cerutti,Giovanni Maurizio Giammanco,Federica Stefanelli,Maria Addolorata Bonifacio,Ada Bertoli,Marialinda Vatteroni,Gabriele Ibba,Federica Novazzi,Maria Rosaria Lipsi,Nunzia Cuomo,Ilaria Vicenti,Francesca Ceccherini-Silberstein,Barbara Rossetti,Antonia Bezenchek,Francesco Saladini,Maurizio Zazzi,Maria Mercedes Santoro,Italian HIV NGS network and the ARCA Cohort
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v16091422
2024-09-06
Viruses
Abstract:Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is gradually replacing Sanger sequencing for HIV genotypic drug resistance testing (GRT). This work evaluated the concordance among different NGS-GRT interpretation tools in a real-life setting. Methods: Routine NGS-GRT data were generated from viral RNA at 11 Italian laboratories with the AD4SEQ HIV-1 Solution v2 commercial kit. NGS results were interpreted by the SmartVir system provided by the kit and by two online tools (HyDRA Web and Stanford HIVdb). NGS-GRT was considered valid when the coverage was >100 reads (100×) at each PR/RT/IN resistance-associated position listed in the HIVdb 9.5.1 algorithm. Results: Among 629 NGS-GRT, 75.2%, 74.2%, and 70.9% were valid according to SmartVir, HyDRA Web, and HIVdb. Considering at least two interpretation tools, 463 (73.6%) NGS-GRT had a valid coverage for resistance analyses. The proportion of valid samples was affected by viremia <10,000-1000 copies/mL and non-B subtypes. Mutations at an NGS frequency >10% showed fair concordance among different interpretation tools. Conclusion: This Italian survey on NGS resistance testing suggests that viremia levels and HIV subtype affect NGS-GRT coverage. Within the current routine method for NGS-GRT, only mutations with frequency >10% seem reliably detected across different interpretation tools.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?