Association of MicroRNA Expression and Serum Neurofilament Light Chain Levels with Clinical and Radiological Findings in Multiple Sclerosis

María Inmaculada Domínguez-Mozo,Ignacio Casanova,Enric Monreal,Lucienne Costa-Frossard,Susana Sainz-de-la-Maza,Raquel Sainz-Amo,Yolanda Aladro-Benito,Pedro Lopez-Ruiz,Laura De-Torres,Sara Abellán,Maria Angel Garcia-Martinez,David De-la-Cuesta,Daniel Lourido,Angel Torrado-Carvajal,Carol Gomez-Barbosa,Carla Linares-Villavicencio,Luisa Maria Villar,Carlos López-De-Silanes,Rafael Arroyo,Roberto Alvarez-Lafuente
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251810012
2024-09-17
Abstract:microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers for many diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS). The neurofilament light chain (NfL) is a biomarker that can detect axonal damage in different neurological diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of the expression profile of pre-selected miRNAs and NfL levels with clinical and radiological variables in MS patients. We conducted a 1-year longitudinal prospective study in MS patients with different clinical forms. We measured clinical disability using the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetry baseline, and cognitive functioning using the processing speed test (PST) at baseline and 1 year later. Selected serum miRNAs and serum NfL (sNfL) levels were quantified. Seventy-three patients were recruited. MiR-126.3p correlated with EDSS and cognitive status at baseline and miR-126.3p and miR-9p correlated with cognitive deterioration at 1 year. Correlations with regional brain volumes were observed between miR-126.3p and the cortical gray matter, cerebellum, putamen, and pallidum; miR-146a.5p with the cerebellum and pallidum; miR-29b.3p with white matter and the pallidum; miR-138.5p with the pallidum; and miR-9.5p with the thalamus. sNfL was correlated with miR-9.5p. miR-146a.5p was also associated with the MS phenotype. These data justify future studies to further explore the utility of miRNAs (mirR-126.3p, miR-146.5p, and miR.9-5p) and sNfL levels as biomarkers of MS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?