The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases
Marcel M Lambrechts, Frank Adriaensen, Daniel R Ardia, Alexandr V Artemyev, Francisco Atiénzar, Jerzy Bańbura, Emilio Barba, Jean-Charles Bouvier, Jordi Camprodon, Caren B Cooper, Russell D Dawson, Marcel Eens, Tapio Eeva, Bruno Faivre, Laszlo Z Garamszegi, Anne E Goodenough, Andrew G Gosler, Arnaud Grégoire, Simon C Griffith, Lars Gustafsson, L Scott Johnson, Wojciech Kania, Oskars Keišs, Paulo E Llambias, Mark C Mainwaring, Raivo Mänd, Bruno Massa, Tomasz D Mazgajski, Anders Pape Møller, Juan Moreno, Beat Naef-Daenzer, Jan-Åke Nilsson, Ana C Norte, Markku Orell, Ken A Otter, Chan Ryul Park, Christopher M Perrins, Jan Pinowski, Jiri Porkert, Jaime Potti, Vladimir Remes, Heinz Richner, Seppo Rytkönen, Ming-Tang Shiao, Bengt Silverin, Tore Slagsvold, Henrik G Smith, Alberto Sorace, Martyn J Stenning, Ian Stewart, Charles F Thompson, Piotr Tryjanowski, Janos Török, Arie J Van Noordwijk, David W Winkler, Nadia Ziane
2010-06-30
Abstract:The widespread use of artificial nestboxes has led to significant advances in our knowledge of the ecology, behaviour and physiology of cavity nesting birds, especially small passerines. Nestboxes have made it easier to perform routine monitoring and experimental manipulation of eggs or nestlings, and also repeatedly to capture, identify and manipulate the parents. However, when comparing results across study sites the use of nestboxes may also introduce a potentially significant confounding variable in the form of differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. However, the use of nestboxes may also introduce an unconsidered and potentially significant confounding variable due to differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in …