Abstract:After their failure to achieve a significant reduction in the global rate of biodiversity loss by 2010, world governments adopted 20 new ambitious Aichi biodiversity targets to be met by 2020. Efforts to achieve one particular target can contribute to achieving others, but different targets may sometimes require conflicting solutions. Consequently, lack of strategic thinking might result, once again, in a failure to achieve global commitments to biodiversity conservation. We illustrate this dilemma by focusing on Aichi Target 11. This target requires an expansion of terrestrial protected area coverage, which could also contribute to reducing the loss of natural habitats (Target 5), reducing human-induced species decline and extinction (Target 12), and maintaining global carbon stocks (Target 15). We considered the potential impact of expanding protected areas to mitigate global deforestation and the consequences for the distribution of suitable habitat for >10,000 species of forest vertebrates (amphibians, birds, and mammals). We first identified places where deforestation might have the highest impact on remaining forests and then identified places where deforestation might have the highest impact on forest vertebrates (considering aggregate suitable habitat for species). Expanding protected areas toward locations with the highest deforestation rates (Target 5) or the highest potential loss of aggregate species' suitable habitat (Target 12) resulted in partially different protected area network configurations (overlapping with each other by about 73%). Moreover, the latter approach contributed to safeguarding about 30% more global carbon stocks than the former. Further investigation of synergies and trade-offs between targets would shed light on these and other complex interactions, such as the interaction between reducing overexploitation of natural resources (Targets 6, 7), controlling invasive alien species (Target 9), and preventing extinctions of native species (Target 12). Synergies between targets must be identified and secured soon and trade-offs must be minimized before the options for co-benefits are reduced by human pressures.

Fair division for avoidance of biodiversity impacts

Global biodiversity research tied up by juridical interpretations of access and benefit sharing

Prioritizing global conservation efforts

Who should benefit from environmental policies? Social preferences and nonmarket values for the distribution of environmental improvements

The Economic Value of Biodiversity Preservation

Modelling trade offs between public and private conservation policies

Principles for area‐based biodiversity conservation

Advancing procedural justice in conservation

The Policy Implications of the Dasgupta Review: Land Use Change and Biodiversity

Fishing for Principles: The Fairness of Fishing Quota Allocations

Safeguarding our future by protecting biodiversity

The path to scientifically sound biodiversity valuation in the context of the Global Biodiversity Framework

Land-Sparing Agriculture Best Protects Avian Phylogenetic Diversity

Biodiversity Offset Program Design and Implementation

Optimal Dynamic Allocation of Conservation Funding Among Priority Regions

Investing in the wealth of nature through biodiversity and ecosystem service finance solutions

Navigating fairness measures and trade-offs

Synergies and trade-offs in achieving global biodiversity targets

Big data, big problems? How to circumvent problems in biodiversity mapping and ensure meaningful results

Aligning the logics of inquiry and action to address the biodiversity crisis

Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting