Abstract:Abstract Background Electric storm is a life threatening condition, that can complicate multiple cardiac pathologies and is associated with high mortality. Catheter ablation has been shown to reduce ventricular tachycardia (VT) burden in patients with electrical storm but the optimal procedural endpoint and the therapeutic particularities required by different etiologies are still under debate. Purpose Our objective was to determine if there are any periprocedural factors that influence midterm outcomes. We also sought if there were any significant differences between the results for ischemic and nonischemic patients. Methods The study included 66 consecutive patients, mean age 60 years, 82% males, treated for electrical storm in our center with endocardial/endo-epicardial radiofrequncy catheter ablation (with or without remote magnetic navigation). Acute success was defined as elimination of the clinical tachycardia with complete non-inducibility (including ventricular fibrillation) or non-inducibility for monomorphic VT with programmed ventricular stimulation using up to 4 extrastimuli. Mean follow-up duration was 9.4 months and the type of recurrence was catalogued in 3 categories: initial VT (isolated), electric storm and other sustained VT. Results The overall acute success rate was 93%, complete non-inducibility was achieved in 64.5% and non-inducibility for monomorphic VT in 87.5% of the cases. Epicardial approach was used in 44% of the non-ischemic cases vs 10.5% of the ischemic ones (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences between complete noninducibility rates and recurrence/death rates of the ischemic vs nonischemic groups. Among the variables analysed for predicting noninducibility, only two reached statistical significance: mean QRS duration of the clinical tachycardia (160 ± 32 ms vs 240 ± 63.3ms, p = 0.02) and shortest RS complex (124 ± 14.7 ms vs 210 ± 12ms, p = 0.02). Recurrent ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 25% of the patients during follow up, from which: 27.2 % initial VT (isolated), 36.4% electric storm and 36.4% other sustained VT. Death rate was 10.6% (7 patients). Kaplan Meier plot showed that the lot with complete noninducibility after programmed ventricular stimulation had better survival rates (p = 0.01). Conclusions Ablative therapy had a good acute success rate, without significant differences between ischemic and noninschemic patients in our study. Complete noninducibility after programmed ventricular stimulation after ablation was associated with better survival rates. Unsuccessfull ablation is a predictor of inhospital death of these patients.

Catheter ablation vs advanced therapy for patients with severe heart failure and ventricular electrical storm

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Who is the best candidate?

First-Line Catheter Ablation of Monomorphic Ventricular Tachycardia in Cardiomyopathy Concurrent With Defibrillator Implantation: The PAUSE-SCD Randomized Trial

Exploring suitability to electrical storm ablation in patients in waiting list for heart transplantation: A single center experience

Acute and Long Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation for the Treatment of Electrical Storm in Patients with Severe Ischemic Heart Failure.

Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with or without Previous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Interventions Undergoing Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

Characterization of ventricular tachycardia ablation in end-stage heart failure patients with left ventricular assist device (CHANNELED registry).

Effect of Postablation Monitoring Strategy on Long-Term Outcome for Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Ventricular Tachycardia Catheter Ablation: Retrospective Analysis and Prospective Outlooks—A Comprehensive Review

Impact of Catheter Ablation of Electrical Storm on Survival: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Long-term prognosis of successful left ventricular substrate modification of electrical storm

Catheter ablation as first-line treatment for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Excellent Outcomes After First-Line Ablation in Post-MI Patients With Tolerated VT and LVEF >35

Ablation therapy following unsuccessful electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Prognosis of patients in end-stage heart failure with atrial fibrillation treated with ablation - Insights from Castle HTX

P355Complete non-inducibility after radiofrequency ablation for electrical storm improves survival rates

[Early experience with mechanical hemodynamic support for catheter ablation of malignant ventricular tachycardia]

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and dilated cardiomyopathy

Catheter ablation vs. drug therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure: An update meta-analysis for randomized controlled trials

Impact of Advanced Therapy Centers on Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions