Performance of visual inspection, partial genotyping, and their combination for the triage of women living with HIV who are screen positive for human papillomavirus: Results from the AIMA‐CC ANRS 12375 multicentric screening study
Pierre Debeaudrap,Firmin Nongodo Kabore,Limsreng Setha,Joseph Tegbe,Brahima Doukoure,Moeung Sotheara,Olivier Segeral,Korn Aun,Eugène Messou,Pauline Bitolog,Kim Sothea,Pierre Vassilakos,Armel Poda,Evelyn Kasilé Poda,Antoine Jaquet,Adolphe Some,Patrick Petignat,Gary Clifford,Apollinaire Horo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35190
2024-09-27
International Journal of Cancer
Abstract:What's New? Screening for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is important for cervical cancer screening, but it is also necessary to identify HPV+ women who have high‐grade cervical lesions and require treatment. Here, the authors compared different triage methods: visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA), HPV genotyping and partial genotyping, and a combined approach. Extended genotyping and VIA both had high sensitivity (89%), but genotyping had lower specificity (29%) than VIA (45%). Partial genotyping had high specificity but low sensitivity, suggesting that VIA and extended genotyping, either alone or in combination, would be the best triage options. The WHO recommends the use of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing for primary cervical cancer (CC) screening because of its high sensitivity. However, triage is desirable to correctly identify HPV+ women who have high‐grade lesions (CIN2+) and require treatment. The ANRS‐12375 study was conducted in Côte d'Ivoire, Burkina Faso and Cambodia to assess the performance, feasibility and benefits of different triage options for detecting CIN2+ lesions: partial (HPV16 and HPV16/18/45) and extended genotyping, visual inspection (VIA) alone and VIA combined with partial genotyping. VIA was performed by gynecologists. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratio (DLR) of each triage option for detecting CIN2+ lesions with histology as a reference standard were calculated. Of the 2253 women living with HIV (WLHIV) included, 932 (41%) were HPV+. A CIN2+ lesion was identified in 105 (13%) of the 777 participants with histopathology results. The sensitivity of VIA as a triage test for CIN2+ patients was 89%, while that for extended genotyping was 89%, that for HPV16/18/45 partial genotyping was 51%, and that for HPV16 partial genotyping was 36%. The specificities for these tests were 45%, 29%, 72%., and 85%, respectively. Combining VIA and/or partial genotyping positivity slightly increased the sensitivity (94%) at the cost of lower specificity (28%). There was significant intersite heterogeneity (p = .04). Among the three triage tests with a sensitivity ≥85%, the VIA had the highest specificity and positive likelihood ratio (p
oncology