Classical psychedelics' action on brain monoaminergic systems

Jasmine Jade Butler,Daria Ricci,Chloé Aman,Anna Beyeler,Philippe De Deurwaerdère
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2024.106669
Abstract:The study of the mechanism of action of classical psychedelics has gained significant interest due to their clinical potential in the treatment of several psychiatric conditions, including major depressive and anxiety disorders. These drugs bind 5-hydroxytryptamine receptors (5-HTR) including 5-HT1AR, 5-HT2AR, 5-HT2BR, and/or 5-HT2CR, as well as other targets. 5-HTRs regulate the activity of ascending monoaminergic neurons, a mechanism primarily involved in the action of classical antidepressant drugs, antipsychotics, and drugs of abuse. Sparse neurochemical data have been produced on the control of monoaminergic neuron activity in response to classical psychedelics. Here we review the available data in order to determine whether classical psychedelics have specific neurochemical effects on serotonergic, dopaminergic, and noradrenergic neurons. The data show that these drugs have disparate effects on each monoaminergic system, demonstrating a complex response with state-dependent and region-specific effects. For instance, several psychedelics inhibit the firing of serotonergic neurons, although this is not necessarily associated with a decrease in serotonin release in all regions. Noradrenergic neuron spontaneous activity also appears to be inhibited by psychedelics, also not necessarily associated with a decrease in noradrenaline release in all regions. Psychedelics influence on dopaminergic systems is also complex as the above-mentioned 5-HTRs may have opposing effects on dopaminergic neuron activity, in a state-dependent manner. There is an apparent lack of clear neuronal signature induced by psychedelics on monoaminergic neuron activity despite specific recurrent mechanisms. This review provides a current summary of the action of psychedelics on monoamine neuromodulators serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline, compiling reoccurring and contradictory findings demonstrating that a monoamine signature of psychedelics, if applicable, would be state- and region-dependant.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?