Comparison of the diagnostic efficacy of systemic inflammatory indicators in the early diagnosis of ovarian cancer
Liyun Song,Qi Wu,Suning Bai,Jing Zhao,Jie Qi,Junmei Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1381268
2024-07-02
Abstract:Background: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CA125, HE4, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and the combination of the six inflammatory-nutritional markers for ovarian cancer (OC) to identify the best diagnostic indicator for OC early diagnosis. An extensive study was performed to establish the connection between these indicators and the pathological aspects of OC. Methods: A total of 170 individuals were included in this study, with 87 diagnosed with OC and 83 with benign ovarian tumors (BOTs). The diagnostic abilities of the variables were evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curves. Through the use of DCA, we evaluated the variables' clinical value in the discrimination of ovarian masses. Results: All markers showed significant diagnostic power for OC. CA125, HE4, SII, FAR, and MLR levels significantly increased from the BOTs group to the early-stage OC group. The advanced-stage OC group had significantly lower PNI values compared to the early-stage OC group but significantly higher levels of CA125, HE4, SII, NLR, and FAR. Moreover, the OC group with lymph node metastasis exhibited significantly higher levels of CA125, HE4, SII, NLR, PLR, and FAR, in contrast to the non-metastatic group, while PNI levels were significantly lower. Categorical factors, such as histological grade and pathological classification, showed noticeable discrepancies in CA125 and HE4 levels. NLR was significantly different among the pathological type groups. Among the six inflammatory-nutritional markers, the FAR displayed the greatest diagnostic value. In the analysis of logistic regression, it was observed that a combination marker containing all six inflammatory-nutritional markers exhibited a notably higher AUC value (0.881; 95% CI, 0.823 - 0.926) than any of the individual marker. Conclusion: PNI, NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, and FAR showed excellent diagnostic performance for OC. The combination of these markers demonstrated a superior diagnostic capability compared to each individual one. The systemic inflammatory indicators may be helpful to diagnose OC.