Studies on soluble cytochromes in Enterobacteriaceae. II. Cytochromes b-562 and c-550.

T. Fujita

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JBCHEM.A128440

1966-09-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

A Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Women with Perinatal Depression and Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Slawa Rokicki,Thomas I Mackie,Robyn D'Oria,Mariella Flores,Ashley Watson,Nancy Byatt,Patricia Suplee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-023-03809-y

Abstract:Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on maternal mental health. We explored the lived experiences of women with perinatal depression and anxiety to elucidate their perceptions of how the pandemic influenced their mental health and access to care. Methods: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews. From March to October 2021, purposive sampling was used to recruit a socio-demographically diverse sample of women with self-reported perinatal depression or anxiety who were pregnant or within one year postpartum between March 2020 and October 2021. Interviews were conducted remotely and thematically analyzed. Results: Fourteen women were interviewed. Three major themes arose. Theme 1, Negative impacts of COVID-19 on symptoms of depression and anxiety, described how the pandemic magnified underlying symptoms of depression and anxiety, increased social isolation, generated anxiety due to fears of COVID-19 infection, and caused economic stress. In theme 2, Negative impacts of COVID-19 on access to and quality of health care, women described stressful and isolating delivery experiences, negative psychological impact of partners not being able to participate in their perinatal health care, interruptions and barriers to mental health treatment, and challenges in using telehealth services for mental health care. Theme 3, Positive impacts of COVID-19 on mental health, identified advantages of increased telehealth access and ability to work and study from home. Conclusions for practice: The COVID-19 pandemic negatively affected women with perinatal depression and anxiety by magnifying underlying symptoms, increasing stress and social isolation, and disrupting access to mental health care. Findings provide support for policies and interventions to prevent and address social isolation, as well as optimization of telehealth services to prevent and address gaps in perinatal mental health treatment.
Perinatal Depression in Australian Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Birth in the Time of COVID-19 (BITTOC) Study

Belinda Lequertier,Mia A. McLean,Sue Kildea,Suzanne King,Hazel Keedle,Yu Gao,Jacqueline A. Boyle,Kingsley Agho,Hannah G. Dahlen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095062

IF: 4.614

2022-04-21

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted perinatal mental health globally. We determined the maternal factors and pandemic-related experiences associated with clinically significant perinatal (pregnant and post-partum) depressive symptoms in Australian women. Participants (n = 2638; pregnant n = 1219, postnatal n = 1419) completed an online survey (August 2020 through February 2021) and self-reported on depression, social support, and COVID-19 related experiences. We found elevated depressive symptoms amongst 26.5% (pregnant) and 19% (postnatal) women. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed higher likelihood of elevated depression associated with residence in Victoria, lower education, past/current mental health problems, greater non-pandemic prenatal stress, age ≥ 35 years (pregnant women) and existing physical health issues or disability in self or others (postnatal women). Greater family stress/discord and lower social support (friends) was associated with higher odds of elevated perinatal depression, while lower social support (family) was significantly associated with elevated depressive symptoms in pregnant women. Greater depression was associated with social distancing, pandemic-related news exposure and changes to prenatal care (pregnant women). Single postnatal women showed lower odds of elevated depression than partnered women. Our findings underscore the importance of universal screening for depression and targeted support during a pandemic for perinatal women displaying vulnerability factors.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Mixed-methods study exploring health service access and social support linkage to the mental well-being of Canadian Indigenous pregnant persons during the COVID-19 pandemic

Meghan Mollons,Sydney Levasseur-Puhach,Jasleen Kaur,Jennifer Doyle,Gerald Giesbrecht,Catherine A Lebel,Lindsay Woods,Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen,Leslie Roos,Mollons,M.,Levasseur-Puhach,S.,Kaur,J.,Doyle,J.,Giesbrecht,G.,Lebel,C. A.,Woods,L.,Tomfohr-Madsen,L.,Roos,L.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078388

IF: 3.006

2024-03-31

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives This study aimed to explore how the unprecedented stressors associated with the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to heightened levels of depression and anxiety among pregnant Indigenous persons, and identify protective individual-level factors. Design The current study used a mixed-methods design including standardised questionnaires and open-ended response questions. Using hierarchical regression models, we examined the extent to which COVID-19-related factors of service disruption (ie, changes to prenatal care, changes to birth plans and social support) were associated with mental well-being. Further, through qualitative analyses of open-ended questions, we examined the coping strategies used by pregnant Indigenous persons in response to the pandemic. Setting Participants responded to an online questionnaire consisting of standardised measures from 2020 to 2021. Participants The study included 336 self-identifying Indigenous pregnant persons in Canada. Results Descriptive results revealed elevated rates of clinically relevant depression (52.7%) and anxiety (62.5%) symptoms among this population. 76.8% of participants reported prenatal care service disruptions, including appointment cancellations. Thematic analyses identified coping themes of staying informed, social and/or cultural connections and activities, and internal mental well-being strategies. Disruptions to services and decreased quality of prenatal care negatively impacted mental well-being of Indigenous pregnant persons during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions Given the potential for mental well-being challenges to persist and long-term effects of perinatal distress, it is important to examine the quality of care that pregnant individuals receive. Service providers should advance policies and practices that promote relationship quality and health system engagement as key factors linked to well-being during the perinatal period for Indigenous persons.

medicine, general & internal
Effect of prostaglandin F2alpha on length of diestrus in mares.

R. Douglas,O. J. Ginther

Prostaglandins

Abstract:
Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

A. R. McKinlay,D. Fancourt,A. Burton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04602-5

2022-04-12

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract:Abstract Background People using maternity services in the United Kingdom (UK) have faced significant changes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic and social distancing regulations. We focused on the experiences of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the pandemic and the impact of social distancing rules on their mental health and wellbeing. Methods We conducted 23 qualitative semi-structured interviews from June 2020 to August 2021, with women from across the UK who experienced a pregnancy during the pandemic. Nineteen participants in the study carried their pregnancy to term and four had experienced a miscarriage during the pandemic. Interviews took place remotely over video or telephone call, discussing topics such as mental health during pregnancy and use of UK maternity services. We used reflexive thematic analysis to analyse interview transcripts. Results We generated six higher order themes: [1] Some pregnancy discomforts alleviated by social distancing measures, [2] The importance of relationships that support coping and adjustment, [3] Missed pregnancy and parenthood experiences, [4] The mental health consequences of birth partner and visitor restrictions, [5] Maternity services under pressure, and [6] Lack of connection with staff. Many participants felt a sense of loss over a pregnancy experience that differed so remarkably to what they had expected because of the pandemic. Supportive relationships were important to help cope with pregnancy and pandemic-related changes; but feelings of isolation were compounded for some participants because opportunities to build social connections through face-to-face parent groups were unavailable. Participants also described feeling alone due to restrictions on their partners being present when accessing UK maternity services. Conclusions Our findings highlight some of the changes that may have affected pregnant women’s mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Reduced social support and being unable to have a partner or support person present during maternity service use were the greatest concerns reported by participants in this study. Absence of birth partners removed a protective buffer in times of uncertainty and distress. This suggests that the availability of a birth partner or support person must be prioritised wherever possible in times of pandemics to protect the mental health of people experiencing pregnancy and miscarriage.

obstetrics & gynecology
Strategies to support maternal and early childhood wellness: insight from parent and provider qualitative interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic

Andrea N Simpson,Nancy N Baxter,Anne Sorvari,Himani Boury,Eliane M Shore,Tali Bogler,Douglas Campbell,Anna R Gagliardi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079479

IF: 3.006

2024-01-26

BMJ Open

Abstract:Objectives The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in rapid changes to the delivery of maternal and newborn care. Our aim was to gain an understanding from parents and healthcare professionals (HCPs) of how the pandemic and associated public health restrictions impacted the peripartum and postpartum experience, as well as longer-term health and well-being of families. Design Qualitative study through focus groups. Setting Ontario, Canada. Participants HCPs and parents who had a child born during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions Semistructured interview guide, with questions focused on how the pandemic impacted their care/their ability to provide care, and strategies to improve care and support now or in future situations with similar healthcare restrictions. Outcome measures Thematic analysis was used to describe participant experiences and recommendations. Results We included 11 HCPs and 15 parents in 6 focus groups. Participants described their experiences as 'traumatic', with difficulties in accessing prenatal and postpartum services, and feelings of distress and isolation. They also noted delays in speech and development in children born during the pandemic. Key recommendations included the provision of partner accompaniment throughout the course of care, expansion of available services for young families (particularly postpartum), and special considerations for marginalised groups, including access to technology for virtual care or the option of in-person visits. Conclusions Our findings may inform the development of healthcare system and organisational policies to ensure the provision of maternal and newborn care in the event of future public health emergencies. Of primary importance to the participants was the accommodation of antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum partner accompaniment, and the provision of postpartum services.

medicine, general & internal
Experiences of postpartum anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study and demographic analysis

Simran Mamrath,Mari Greenfield,Cristina Fernandez Turienzo,Victoria Fallon,Sergio A Silverio,Sergio A. Silverio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297454

IF: 3.7

2024-03-07

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Introduction The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic saw the reconfiguration of perinatal and maternity services, national lockdowns, and social distancing measures which affected the perinatal experiences of new and expectant parents. This study aimed to explore the occurrence of postpartum anxieties in people who gave birth during the pandemic. Methods An exploratory concurrent mixed-methods design was chosen to collect and analyse the quantitative and qualitative data of an online survey during the first UK lockdown. The survey included the Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale–Research Short Form–for use in global Crises [PSAS-RSF-C] psychometric tool, and open-ended questions in relation to changes in birth plans and feelings about those changes and giving birth in a pandemic. Differences in measured scores were analysed for the participant’s ethnicity, sexual orientation and disability using independent Student’s t -tests, and for age, the analysis was completed using Pearson’s correlation. Qualitative data from open-ended questions were analysed using a template analysis. Results A total of 1,754 new and expectant parents completed the survey between 10 th and 24 th April 2020, and 381 eligible postnatal women completed the psychometric test. We found 52.5% of participants reported symptoms consistent with a diagnosis of postnatal anxiety–significantly higher than the rates usually reported. Younger women and sexual minority women were more likely to score highly on the PSAS-RSF-C than their older or heterosexual counterparts ( p <0.001). Younger participants reported anxieties in the ‘infant safety and welfare’ category, whilst lesbian, gay, bisexual, and pansexual participants scored highly in the ‘psychosocial adjustment to motherhood’ category. Discussion Postpartum anxiety is under-reported, and demographic differences in the rates of postpartum anxiety are under-researched. This research demonstrates for the first time a difference in postpartum anxiety rates amongst sexual minority women.

multidisciplinary sciences
Stress, coping and silver linings: How depressed perinatal women experienced the COVID-19 pandemic

Micheline R Anderson,Amy L Salisbury,Lisa A Uebelacker,Ana M Abrantes,Cynthia L Battle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.116

2022-02-01

Abstract:Background: Research on perinatal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic has largely focused on data from community samples. This study sought to understand the experiences of pregnant and postpartum women with histories of clinically elevated symptoms of depression. Methods: Participants included 60 perinatal women who participated in wellness intervention trials for women with antenatal depression. We used a mixed methods approach, assessing depression, anxiety, stressors and coping behaviors, along with narrative responses to questions regarding COVID-specific effects on mental health. Results: Over three-fourths of the sample indicated a worsening of mental health during the pandemic, with 31.7% of women endorsing clinically elevated depression symptoms and 36.7% screening positive for anxiety. Women reported negative impacts on their emotional wellbeing, especially a resurgence of mental health symptoms. Participants also articulated positive experiences during the pandemic, including an appreciation for increased time with family, especially infants. Women detailed numerous, mostly adaptive, coping strategies they had used to mitigate stress; self-isolation and spending time outdoors were associated with having depression above or below the clinical cut off, respectively. Limitations: The study had a small sample, and the generalizability of findings may be limited, given that participants were clinical trial completers. Conclusions: Although the pandemic upended many aspects of life for perinatal women and raised mental health concerns, many also reported adaptive means of coping and positive experiences or 'silver linings' related to pandemic restrictions. Some coping strategies that were utilized, including wellness-based behaviors, may have helped to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 related stress.
Prenatal distress, access to services, and birth outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a longitudinal study

Jennifer E Khoury,Leslie Atkinson,Teresa Bennett,Susan M Jack,Andrea Gonzalez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2022.105606

Abstract:Background/aims: During the COVID-19 pandemic, pregnant people have experienced disruptions to prenatal care, as well elevated rates of mental health problems and distress. The current longitudinal study aims to understand how different forms of prenatal distress (mental health problems, COVID-19 stressful experiences, and access to prenatal services) impact infant birth outcomes during the pandemic. Methods: Participants were 265 pregnant individuals from Ontario, Canada. Maternal depression, pregnancy-related anxiety, COVID-related stressors (i.e., financial difficulties, social isolation), and disruptions to prenatal and health services were assessed during pregnancy. Delivery experiences and birth outcomes were assessed in the early postpartum period. Associations between pregnancy stressors and birth outcomes were assessed using path analyses. Results: Participants reported experiencing substantial changes to their prenatal care due to COVID-19; 23.0 % had prenatal appointments cancelled, 47.9 % had difficulty accessing prenatal classes, and 60.8 % reported changes to their birth plans. Results of path analyses showed a unique effect of pregnancy-related anxiety during the pandemic on lower birth weight, younger gestational age at birth, and more infant birth problems. Further, multi-group path analysis revealed these effects were more pronounced in male infants. Conclusions: Findings demonstrate that pregnant individuals in Ontario, Canada have experienced considerable disruptions to services during pregnancy. In addition, pregnancy-related anxiety was uniquely linked to elevated risk for adverse birth outcomes, which more heavily impacted male infants. These findings underscore the need for additional mental health support and access to services for pregnant people and their infants, to reduce long-term adverse maternal and fetal health outcomes.
Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic

Catherine Lebel,Anna MacKinnon,Mercedes Bagshawe,Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen,Gerald Giesbrecht

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.126

IF: 6.533

2020-12-01

Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract:BackgroundAnxiety and depression symptoms in pregnancy typically affect between 10 and 25% of pregnant individuals. Elevated symptoms of depression and anxiety are associated with increased risk of preterm birth, postpartum depression, and behavioural difficulties in children. The current COVID-19 pandemic is a unique stressor with potentially wide-ranging consequences for pregnancy and beyond.MethodsWe assessed symptoms of anxiety and depression among pregnant individuals during the current COVID-19 pandemic and determined factors that were associated with psychological distress. 1987 pregnant participants in Canada were surveyed in April 2020. The assessment included questions about COVID-19-related stress and standardized measures of depression, anxiety, pregnancy-related anxiety, and social support.ResultsWe found substantially elevated anxiety and depression symptoms compared to similar pre-pandemic pregnancy cohorts, with 37% reporting clinically relevant symptoms of depression and 57% reporting clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety. Higher symptoms of depression and anxiety were associated with more concern about threats of COVID-19 to the life of the mother and baby, as well as concerns about not getting the necessary prenatal care, relationship strain, and social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher levels of perceived social support and support effectiveness, as well as more physical activity, were associated with lower psychological symptoms.ConclusionThis study shows concerningly elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic, that may have long-term impacts on their children. Potential protective factors include increased social support and exercise, as these were associated with lower symptoms and thus may help mitigate long-term negative outcomes.

psychiatry,clinical neurology
Prenatal maternal mental health and resilience in the United Kingdom during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross- national comparison

Swarali Datye,Marko Smiljanic,Rohan Shetti,Alison MacRae-Miller,Edwin van Teijlingen,Latha Vinayakarao,Eva M. J. Peters,Catherine Lebel,Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen,Gerald Giesbrecht,Minesh Khashu,Melanie L. Conrad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1411761

IF: 4.7

2024-09-26

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Introduction Prenatal mental health problems are associated with morbidity for the pregnant person, and their infants are at long-term risk for poor health outcomes. We aim to explore how the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic affected the mental health of pregnant people in the United Kingdom (UK), and to further identify resilience factors which may have contributed to varying mental health outcomes. We also aim to examine the quality of antenatal care provided during the pandemic in the UK and to identify potential inadequacies to enhance preparedness for future events. Methods During June-November 2020, we recruited 3666 individuals in the UK for the EPPOCH pregnancy cohort (Maternal mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effect of the Pandemic on Pregnancy Outcomes and Childhood Health). Participants were assessed for depression, anxiety, anger and pregnancy-related anxiety using validated scales. Additionally, physical activity, social support, individualized support and personal coping ability of the respondents were assessed as potential resilience factors. Results Participants reported high levels of depression (57.05%), anxiety (58.04%) and anger (58.05%). Higher levels of social and individualized support and personal coping ability were associated with lower mental health challenges. Additionally, pregnant individuals in the UK experienced higher depression during the pandemic than that reported in Canada. Finally, qualitative analysis revealed that restrictions for partners and support persons during medical appointments as well as poor public health communication led to increased mental health adversities and hindered ability to make medical decisions. Discussion This study revealed increased mental health challenges among pregnant individuals in the UK during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. These results highlight the need for reassessing the mental health support measures available to pregnant people in the UK, both during times of crisis and in general.

psychiatry
COVID-19 and mental health during pregnancy: The importance of cognitive appraisal and social support

Leslie Atkinson,Teresa Bennett,Andrea Gonzalez,Jennifer E. Khoury,Susan M. Jack

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.027

IF: 6.533

2021-03-01

Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract:BackgroundPregnancy is a period of elevated risk for mental health difficulties, which are likely exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to understand the impact of COVID-19 on mental health and identify risk and protective factors during pregnancy.MethodsParticipants were 303 pregnant individuals from Ontario, Canada. Depression, anxiety and insomnia were measured using validated questionnaires. COVID-related experiences (i.e., financial difficulties, relationship conflict, social isolation) were assessed in relation to mental health. Social support and cognitive appraisal of the pandemic were examined as protective factors.Results57% of the sample reported clinically elevated depression, >30% reported elevated worries, and 19% reported elevated insomnia. Depression (t = 25.14, p < .0001) and anxiety (t = 17.21, p < .0001) levels were higher than non-COVID pregnant samples. Social isolation, financial trouble, relationship difficulties and threat of COVID-19 were associated with mental health. Social support (rrange −.24 to −.38, p <.01) was associated with lower mental health problems and negative cognitive appraisal (rrange .20 to .33, p <.01) was linked to more mental health problems. Furthermore, social support and cognitive appraisal interacted (β = -.92, SE = .41, p < .05), such that higher social support acted as a protective factor, particularly for those who appraise the impact of COVID-19 to be more negative.ConclusionsFindings underscore the need to address the high rates of mental health during pregnancy and outline potential targets (cognitive appraisal and social support) to protect pregnant people from experiencing mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic.

psychiatry,clinical neurology
Intentions to Seek Mental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic among Chinese Pregnant Women with Probable Depression or Anxiety: Cross-sectional, Web-Based Survey Study

Qian Wang,Bo Song,Jiangli Di,Xue Yang,Anise Wu,Joseph Lau,Meiqi Xin,Linhong Wang,Phoenix Kit-Han Mo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/24162

2021-01-01

JMIR Mental Health

Abstract:Background Mental health problems are prevalent among pregnant women, and it is expected that their mental health will worsen during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the underutilization of mental health services among pregnant women has been widely documented. Objective We aimed to identify factors that are associated with pregnant women’s intentions to seek mental health services. We specifically assessed pregnant women who were at risk of mental health problems in mainland China. Methods A web-based survey was conducted from February to March, 2020 among 19,515 pregnant women who were recruited from maternal health care centers across various regions of China. A subsample of 6248 pregnant women with probable depression (ie, those with a score of ≥10 on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire) or anxiety (ie, those with a score of ≥5 on the 7-item General Anxiety Disorder Scale) was included in our analysis. Results More than half (3292/6248, 52.7%) of the participants reported that they did not need mental health services. Furthermore, 28.3% (1770/6248) of participants felt that they needed mental health services, but had no intentions of seeking help, and only 19% (1186/6248) felt that they needed mental health services and had intentions of seek help. The results from our multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, education level, and gestational age were factors of not seeking help. However, COVID-19–related lockdowns in participants’ cities of residence, social support during the COVID-19 pandemic, and trust in health care providers were protective factors of participants’ intentions to seek help from mental health services. Conclusions Interventions that promote seeking help for mental health problems among pregnant women should also promote social support from health care providers and trust between pregnant women and their care providers.
Unmet needs in mental healthcare for women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression and/or anxiety during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Raquel Costa,Ana Mesquita,Emma Motrico,Sara Domínguez‐Salas,Pelin Dikmen‐Yildiz,Sandra Saldivia,Eleni Vousoura,Ana Osorio,Claire A. Wilson,Rena Bina,Drorit Levy,Andri Christoforou,Maria Fernanda González,Camelia Hancheva,Ethel Felice,Tiago Miguel Pinto

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13664

2024-02-13

Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica

Abstract:Objective/Background Unmet needs in perinatal mental healthcare are an important public health issue particularly in the context of a stressful life event such as the COVID‐19 pandemic but data on the extent of this problem are needed. Aim The aim of this study is to determine the (1) proportion of women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression, anxiety or comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety, receiving mental healthcare overall and by country and (2) factors associated with receiving mental healthcare. Method Women in the perinatal period (pregnancy or up to 6 months postpartum) participating in the Riseup‐PPD‐COVID‐19 cross‐sectional study, reported on sociodemographic, social support health‐related factors, and COVID‐19 related factors, and on symptoms of depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale [EPDS]) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder [GAD‐7]) using self‐report questionnaires. Clinically significant symptoms were defined as EPDS ≥ 13 for depression and GAD‐7 ≥ 10 for anxiety. Mental healthcare was defined as self‐reported current mental health treatment. Results Of the 11 809 participants from 12 countries included in the analysis, 4 379 (37.1%) reported clinically significant symptoms of depression (n = 1 228; 10.4%; EPDS ≥ 13 and GAD‐7 ⟨ 10), anxiety (n = 848; 7.2%; GAD‐7 ≥ 10 and EPDS ⟨ 13) or comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety (n = 2 303; 19.5%; EPDS ≥ 13 and GAD‐7 ≥ 10). Most women with clinically significant symptoms of depression, anxiety, or comorbid symptoms of depression and anxiety were not receiving mental healthcare (89.0%). Variation in the proportion of women with clinically significant symptoms of depression and/or anxiety reporting mental healthcare was high (4.7% in Turkey to 21.6% in Brazil). Women in the postpartum (vs. pregnancy) were less likely (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59‐0.88), whereas women with previous mental health problems (vs. no previous mental health problems) (OR 5.56; 95% CI 4.41‐7.01), were more likely to receive mental healthcare. Conclusion There are high unmet needs in mental healthcare for women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression and/or anxiety across countries during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Studies beyond the COVID‐19 pandemic and covering the whole range of mental health problems in the perinatal period are warranted to understand the gaps in perinatal mental healthcare.

psychiatry
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health screening, illness and pregnancy outcomes: A cohort study

Andre C. Q. Lo,Michelle Kemp,Nikolett Kabacs

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X221139565

2022-11-29

Obstetric Medicine

Abstract:Obstetric Medicine, Ahead of Print. BackgroundThe aim was to explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health screening, illness and related pregnancy complications/outcomes.MethodsA single-centre retrospective cohort study in mothers giving birth before versus during the pandemic. Primary outcomes were the comparative prevalence/incidence of peripartum psychiatric diagnoses. Secondary outcomes were the pandemic's effect on psychiatric screening accuracy, and on other pregnancy outcomes linked to mental health.ResultsThe pandemic did not significantly increase the crude incidence of diagnosed peripartum anxiety (risk ratio (RR) = 1.39, 95% CI = 0.66–2.95), depression (RR = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.72–3.70) or other pregnancy outcomes. In multivariate models, the pandemic decreased Apgar scores and was involved in interaction effects for postpartum mental illness and birthweight. Psychiatric screening at the booking appointment exhibited lower sensitivity in predicting antenatal mental illness (pre-pandemic = 85.71%, pandemic = 25.00%; p = 0.035).ConclusionsThe lowered screening sensitivity likely meant mental illness was poorly anticipated/under-detected during the pandemic, leading to no crude increase in perinatal psychiatric diagnoses.
Healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of providing support for mental health during the period from pregnancy to two years postpartum

Johanna Pope,Sarah Redsell,Catherine Houghton,Karen Matvienko-Sikar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2022.103581

IF: 2.64

Midwifery

Abstract:Objective: Mental health issues in the perinatal period are common, and can have negative consequences for maternal and child health. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) who provide women with perinatal care are well-placed to detect mental health issues and provide support. This study therefore examines HCPs' experiences and perceptions of providing mental health support during the perinatal period, including during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: An exploratory realist qualitative study was conducted. Setting: Republic of Ireland PARTICIPANTS: A purposive sampling strategy was employed to recruit HCPs (e.g., general practitioners, midwives, public health nurses, practice nurses, doulas, and breastfeeding counsellors), via professional bodies in Ireland. An invitation to participate was also circulated via Twitter. A total of 18 HCPs participated in semi-structured interviews conducted between 18/8/2020 and 24/5/2021. Measurements and findings: Semi-structured interviews were conducted according to a topic guide designed by a multidisciplinary team. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Four themes were developed: 'Supporting women in healthcare settings,' 'Skills and capacity to provide adequate care,' 'Structural barriers to care provision,' and 'The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on stress support.' Key conclusions: HCPs reported providing emotional support and advocacy, but highlighted challenges, including limited capacity to address women's concerns, clinical culture and hierarchy, insufficient organisational investment, and social inequities in support access. Some HCPs felt these barriers could lead to additional psychological harm. HCPs also reported that the pandemic had introduced novel stressors and changed the nature of the mental health support they provided. Implications for practice: Interventions incorporating education and physical resources for HCPs, increased investment in specialist perinatal mental health services, increased investment in holistic supports, and changes to address cultural challenges in care environments, may facilitate - or enhance - support for women.
Mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID‐19 pandemic—A multinational cross‐sectional study

Michael Ceulemans,Veerle Foulon,Elin Ngo,Alice Panchaud,Ursula Winterfeld,Léo Pomar,Valentine Lambelet,Brian Cleary,Fergal O'Shaughnessy,Anneke Passier,Jonathan L. Richardson,Titia Hompes,Hedvig Nordeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14092

2021-02-13

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>Evidence on perinatal mental health during the COVID‐19 pandemic and its potential determinants is limited. Therefore, this multinational study aimed to assess the mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the pandemic, and to explore potential associations between depressive symptoms, anxiety and stress, and women's socio‐demographic, health and reproductive characteristics.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Material and methods</h3><p>A cross‐sectional, web‐based study was performed in Ireland, Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and the UK between 16 June and 14 July 2020. Pregnant and breastfeeding women up to three months postpartum who were older than 18 years were eligible. The online, anonymous survey was promoted via social media and hospital websites. The Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7‐item scale (GAD‐7), and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) were used to assess mental health status. Regression model analysis was used to identify factors associated with poor mental health status.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In total, 9041 women participated (including 3907 pregnant and 5134 breastfeeding women). The prevalence of major depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Depression Scale ≥13) was 15% and 13% in the pregnancy and breastfeeding cohort, respectively. Moderate to severe generalized anxiety symptoms (GAD≥10) were found among 11% and 10% of the pregnant and breastfeeding women. The mean(±SD) Perceived Stress Scale scores for pregnant and breastfeeding women were 14.1±6.6 and 13.7±6.6, respectively. Risk factors associated with poor mental health included having a chronic mental illness, a chronic somatic illness in the postpartum period, smoking, having an unplanned pregnancy, professional status, and living in the UK or Ireland.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>This multinational study found high levels of depressive symptoms and generalized anxiety among pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID‐19 outbreak. The study findings underline the importance of monitoring perinatal mental health during pandemics and other societal crises to safeguard maternal and infant mental health.</p></section>

obstetrics & gynecology
Depression, anxiety, and stress in pregnancy and postpartum: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic

Emily P Rabinowitz,Lindsay A Kutash,Alexis L Richeson,MacKenzie A Sayer,Marielle R Samii,Douglas L Delahanty

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103655

IF: 2.64

Midwifery

Abstract:Introduction: Symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in pregnant women are generally highest in the first trimester and then decrease throughout pregnancy, reaching their lowest point in the postpartum period. Pregnant women are a high-risk population for mortality and mental health symptoms due to COVID-19. However, the extent to which the chronic stress of the COVID-19 pandemic alters the trajectory of depression, anxiety and stress symptoms in pregnant/postpartum women is unknown. Methods: Women (N=127) who were pregnant or who had given birth less than one month prior were recruited via online advertising during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants were assessed up to three times during the pregnancy and at 1-month postpartum for depression (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale), anxiety, and stress (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21). Random intercepts models examined symptom change over time as well as predictors of elevated postpartum psychopathology. Results: On average, women completed their surveys at 8.5 weeks (first trimester), 21 weeks (second trimester), 32 weeks (third trimester) and 7-weeks postpartum. Women reported mild-moderate levels of depression, anxiety, and stress throughout pregnancy. There was a significant change in symptoms of depression and anxiety over time which was best represented by a quadratic rather than linear trajectory: symptoms increased until week 23-25 and then decreased. Stress levels remained consistently elevated over time. Higher symptom levels at 1-month postpartum were predicted by younger age, lower social support, and worry about going to a healthcare facility. Change in routine due to COVID-19 was not predictive of symptom trajectory from pregnancy to postpartum. Conclusions: During COVID-19, symptoms of depression and anxiety increased from early to mid-pregnancy but then declined slightly while stress levels remained elevated. Observed reductions in symptoms were small. Given the substantial persistent impact of perinatal distress and poor mental health on maternal and fetal health, providers should be aware of heightened levels of these symptoms in pregnant women during large-scale external health stressors such as COVID-19, and should implement screening procedures to identify and appropriately intervene with at-risk women.
Alertness management strategies for operational contexts.

J. Caldwell,J. Caldwell,Regina Schmidt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2008.01.002

IF: 11.401

2008-08-01

Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract:
The mental health crisis of expectant women in the UK: effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on prenatal mental health, antenatal attachment and social support

Maria Laura Filippetti,Alasdair D. F. Clarke,Silvia Rigato

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04387-7

2022-01-26

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Abstract:Abstract Background Pregnancy has been shown to be times in a woman’s life particularly prone to mental health issues, however a substantial percentage of mothers report subclinical perinatal mental health symptoms that go undetected. Experiences of prenatal trauma, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, may exacerbate vulnerability to negative health outcomes for pregnant women and their infants. We aimed to examine the role of: 1) anxiety, depression, and stress related to COVID-19 in predicting the quality of antenatal attachment; 2) perceived social support and COVID-19 appraisal in predicting maternal anxiety and depression. Methods A sample of 150 UK expectant women were surveyed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Questions included demographics, pregnancy details, and COVID-19 appraisal. Validated measures were used to collect self-reported maternal antenatal attachment (MAAS), symptoms of anxiety (STAI), depression (BDI-II), and stress related to the psychological impact of COVID-19 (IES-r). Results We found that the pandemic has affected UK expectant mothers’ mental health by increasing prevalence of depression (47%), anxiety (60%) and stress related to the psychological impact of COVID-19 (40%). Women for whom COVID-19 had a higher psychological impact were more likely to suffer from depressive (95% HDPI = [0.04, 0.39]) and anxiety symptoms (95% HPDI = [0.40, 0.69]). High depressive symptoms were associated with reduced attachment to the unborn baby (95% HPDI [-0.46, -0.1]). Whilst women who appraised the impact of COVID-19 to be more negative showed higher levels of anxiety (HPDI = [0.15, 0.46]), higher social support acted as a protective factor and was associated with lower anxiety (95% HPDI = [-0.52, -0.21]). Conclusions The current findings demonstrate that direct experience of prenatal trauma, such as the one experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, significantly amplifies mothers’ vulnerability to mental health symptoms and impairs the formation of a positive relationship with their unborn baby. Health services should prioritise interventions strategies aimed at fostering support for pregnant women.

obstetrics & gynecology

Studies on soluble cytochromes in Enterobacteriaceae. II. Cytochromes b-562 and c-550.

A Qualitative Investigation of the Experiences of Women with Perinatal Depression and Anxiety during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Perinatal Depression in Australian Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Birth in the Time of COVID-19 (BITTOC) Study

Mixed-methods study exploring health service access and social support linkage to the mental well-being of Canadian Indigenous pregnant persons during the COVID-19 pandemic

Effect of prostaglandin F2alpha on length of diestrus in mares.

Factors affecting the mental health of pregnant women using UK maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study

Strategies to support maternal and early childhood wellness: insight from parent and provider qualitative interviews during the COVID-19 pandemic

Experiences of postpartum anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study and demographic analysis

Stress, coping and silver linings: How depressed perinatal women experienced the COVID-19 pandemic

Prenatal distress, access to services, and birth outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Findings from a longitudinal study

Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic

Prenatal maternal mental health and resilience in the United Kingdom during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a cross- national comparison

COVID-19 and mental health during pregnancy: The importance of cognitive appraisal and social support

Intentions to Seek Mental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic among Chinese Pregnant Women with Probable Depression or Anxiety: Cross-sectional, Web-Based Survey Study

Unmet needs in mental healthcare for women with clinically significant symptoms of perinatal depression and/or anxiety during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal mental health screening, illness and pregnancy outcomes: A cohort study

Healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions of providing support for mental health during the period from pregnancy to two years postpartum

Mental health status of pregnant and breastfeeding women during the COVID‐19 pandemic—A multinational cross‐sectional study

Depression, anxiety, and stress in pregnancy and postpartum: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 pandemic

Alertness management strategies for operational contexts.

The mental health crisis of expectant women in the UK: effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on prenatal mental health, antenatal attachment and social support