Abstract:Objective: In the present report, we have described the outcomes of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D). Methods: Cases of endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair performed between January 2015 and December 2019 for aortic dissection designated as B1-2, D by the Society for Vascular Surgery/Society of Thoracic Surgeons classification were retrospectively analyzed. The primary end point was all-cause mortality at follow-up. The secondary end points included early mortality, early morbidities, and aortic-related late events. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to analyze survival from all-cause mortality and freedom from aortic-related late events in the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups. Propensity score matching and stratification (stratified by proximal dissection extension: B1, D and B2, D) were performed as sensitivity analyses to compare the outcomes among the three treatment patterns after controlling for major confounders. Results: The present study included 151 patients (men, 79.5%; mean age, 47.3 ± 10.5 years), with 72 (47.7%) in the endovascular group, 46 (30.5%) in the hybrid group, and 33 (21.8%) in the open group. No significant difference was noted in early mortality between the endovascular, hybrid, and open groups (1.4% vs 2.2% vs 3.0%; P = .791). The incidence of early endoleak was significantly greater (33.3% vs 13.0% vs 6.1%; P = .002) and the incidence of renal function deterioration was less (4.2% vs 26.1% vs 24.2%; P = .001) after endovascular repair vs hybrid arch repair and open surgery. After a median follow-up of 40.0 months (range, 0-84.0 months), no significant differences were found in all-cause mortality (5.6% vs 4.3% vs 3.0%; P = 1.0), aortic-related late events (16.7% vs 15.2% vs 12.1%; P = .834), or late endoleak (9.7% vs 4.3% vs 6.1%; P = .630) after endovascular, hybrid, and open surgery. The propensity score matching and stratification analyses displayed consistent outcomes for early mortality, all-cause mortality, and aortic-related late events among the three groups. Conclusions: The mid- to long-term outcomes after endovascular repair, hybrid arch repair, and open surgical repair for type B dissection involving the aortic arch (B1-2, D) were favorable and comparable in selected patients. Extensive experience and multidisciplinary teamwork are prerequisites for individualized strategies for repair of B1-2, D.

Elective root replacement increases the risk of type B dissection in patients with Marfan syndrome

Fate of the distal aorta following root replacement in Marfan syndrome: a propensity score matched study

Influence of Primary Intimal Tear Location in Type B Aortic Dissection As a Factor Portending Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection after Endovascular Repair

Deployment of Endograft in the Ascending Aorta to Reverse Type A Aortic Dissection.

External aortic root support for Marfan syndrome: early clinical results in the first 20 recipients with a bespoke implant

Aortic Regurgitation in Marfan Syndrome Patients Who Underwent Prophylactic Surgery: A Single-Center Experience.

The non to moderately dilated root in acute type A aortic dissection: outcomes of the PENN–BERN registry in young, non-syndromic patients

Surgical treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of type B aortic dissection involving the aortic arch

Comparison of long-term outcomes of the Bentall procedure between patients with and without Marfan syndrome

Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch

Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Endovascular Stent Graft Placement for Treatment of Type B Dissection

[A Retrospective Comparative Study of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection in Patients with Marfan Syndrome and Bicuspid Aortic Valves].

[Surgery for type A aortic dissection: long-term results and risk factor analysis]

Hemostatic Properties of Aortic Root Preservation versus Root Replacement for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Pooled Analysis

Aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve dysfunction does not impair survival rates

Acute Aortic Dissection Type A in Younger Patients (< 60 Years Old) — Does Full Arch Replacement Provide Benefits Compared to Limited Approach?

Marfan syndrome and aortic involvement: a narrative review

Late reoperations after acute aortic dissection repair: Single-center experience

Increased Frequency of FBN1 Frameshift and Nonsense Mutations in Marfan Syndrome Patients with Aortic Dissection

Imaging of the Postsurgical Aorta in Marfan Syndrome

Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Between Marfan Syndrome and Non-Marfan Syndrome Patients