Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10, October 2024. Background:Given the growing concerns regarding objective measures of clinical outcomes, attention has recently been devoted to the establishment of clinically significant outcome (CSO) thresholds for patient-reported functional scores after rotator cuff surgery.Purpose:To retrospectively compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) and radiographic data between patients who underwent arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with and without long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) augmentation.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 43 patients receiving arthroscopic SCR between 2016 and 2020 were enrolled, including a biceps augmentation group (n = 27) and a nonaugmentation group (n = 16). Patients were asked an anchor question regarding their satisfaction and perception of improvements. PROMs of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Constant score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain scores and radiographic data including magnetic resonance imaging and plain radiographs were collected and compared between the 2 groups. Anchor questions in CSO analysis for deriving the minimal clinically importance difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and maximal outcome improvement (MOI) values were applied ≥2 years postoperatively.Results:Based on satisfaction responses, 17 patients were classified as satisfied, 16 as unsatisfied, and 10 as fair. Additionally, 13 patients felt they were improved, 14 changed, and 16 unchanged. Intergroup comparison based on patients' satisfaction and perception of change or improvement exhibited significant differences in all 4 functional scores in favor of the satisfied and improved patients. However, there was no significant difference in the ΔVAS scores between the groups. CSO analyses showed no significant difference in percentage of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS thresholds for the ΔASES, ΔConstant, and ΔSANE scores between patients undergoing arthroscopic SCR with or without LHBT augmentation. A significant difference was found in the percentage of patients achieving the MOI for ΔASES score with 70.4% in the augmented group and 37.5% in the nonaugmented group, respectively. The mean acromiohumeral distance (AHD) differed significantly between augmentation (8.1 ± 2.2 mm) and nonaugmentation (7 ± 1.9 mm) groups. The graft tear rate did not differ significantly.Conclusion:There was no significant difference in PROs and percentage of patients achieving MCID, SCB, and PASS between isolated and augmented SCR groups. A higher percentage of patients achieving MOI and slightly greater AHD were found in the augmented group. Further evaluation is required to determine if there is any long-term benefit to LHBT augmentation of SCR.

Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears Yields Good Clinical Outcomes for Patients With and Without Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Primary Rotator Cuff Repair in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients 65 Years and Older With Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive, Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review of Modern Literature

Margin convergence versus superior capsular reconstruction for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: outcomes are equivalent unless there is pre-operative pseudoparesis

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using an Acellular Dermal Xenograft or Allograft Improves Shoulder Function but Is Associated with a High Graft Failure Rate

Clinical and Structural Outcomes after Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients with Diabetes: A Meta-analysis

Comparison of the clinical outcomes and temporal changes between superior capsular reconstruction and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with irreparable rotator cuff tear without osteoarthritic change

Patients With Graft Tears Leaving the Tuberosity Covered Have Similar Functional Outcomes to Those With an Intact Graft After Superior Capsular Reconstruction

A Comparative Study on Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Using Fascia Lata Autograft With and Without Long Head of the Biceps Tendon Augmentation: Two-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis

Effect of Medial or Lateral Graft Failure on Graft Volume and Clinical Outcomes After Superior Capsule Reconstruction for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears

Improved Acromiohumeral Distance Independently Predicts Better Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Graft Tears

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Combined With Lower Trapezius Tendon Transfer Improves the Biomechanics in Posterosuperior Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Editorial Commentary: Superior Capsular Reconstruction with Achilles Allograft Can Reverse Pseudoparalysis While Improving Functional Patient Outcomes

Superior Capsular Reconstruction Versus Middle Trapezius Tendon Transfer for Isolated Irreparable Supraspinatus Tendon Tears: Static Versus Dynamic Reconstruction

Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for postoperative complications following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

A Comparative Study of Superior Capsule Reconstruction and Patch Graft Augmentation

Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

Clinical outcome of arthroscopic acromioplasty vs. arthroscopic rotator cuff repair for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A3-year follow-up

Comparison of Multiple Surgical Treatments for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears in Patients Younger Than 70 Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Elevated HbA1c is not associated with reoperation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in patients with diabetes mellitus