Abstract:Background: Adults with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases face unique challenges and struggles to navigate health-care systems designed to manage common conditions. Evidence to inform an optimal service framework for their care is scarce. Using systemic vasculitis as an exemplar, we aimed to identify and explain the key service components underpinning effective care for rare diseases. Methods: In this mixed-methods study, data were collected as part of a survey of vasculitis service providers across the UK and Ireland, interviews with patients, and from organisational case studies to identify key service components that enable good care. The association between these components and patient outcomes (eg, serious infections, mortality) and provider outcomes (eg, emergency hospital admissions) were examined in a population-based data linkage study using routine health-care data obtained from patients with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis from national health datasets in Scotland. We did univariable and multivariable analyses using Bayesian poisson and negative binomial regression to estimate incident rate ratios (IRRs), and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). People with lived experiences were involved in the research and writing process. Findings: Good care was characterised by service components that supported timely access to services, integrated care, and expertise. In 1420 patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis identified from national health datasets, service-reported average waiting times for new patients of less than 1 week were associated with fewer serious infections (IRR 0·70 [95% credibility interval 0·55-0·88]) and fewer emergency hospital admissions (0·78 [0·68-0·92]). Nurse-led advice lines were associated with fewer serious infections (0·76 [0·58-0·93]) and fewer emergency hospital admissions (0·85 [0·74-0·96]). Average waiting times for new patients of less than 1 week were also associated with reduced mortality (HR 0·59 [95% credibility interval 0·37-0·93]). Cohorted clinics, nurse-led clinics, and specialist vasculitis multi-disciplinary team meetings were associated with fewer serious infections (IRR 0·75 [0·59-0·96] for cohorted clinics; 0·65 [0·39-0·84] for nurse-led clinics; 0·72 [0·57-0·90] for specialist vasculitis multi-disciplinary team meetings) and emergency hospital admissions (0·81 [0·71-0·91]; 0·75 [0·65-0·94]; 0·86 [0·75-0·96]). Key components were characterised by their ability to overcome professional tensions between specialties. Interpretation: Key service components associated with important health outcomes and underpinning factors were identified to inform initiatives to improve the design, delivery, and effectiveness of health-care models for rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Funding: Versus Arthritis.

National survey of hospital rheumatology service users to inform a statement set describing the minimum service expectations for publicly funded rheumatology secondary care in Aotearoa New Zealand

Patient participation in defining best-practice rheumatology service provision in Aotearoa New Zealand: a qualitative study with service consumers

Nursing and allied health workforce in Australian public rheumatology departments is inadequate: a cross-sectional observational study

The First Nations experience of accessing rheumatology services in a metropolitan hospital: A qualitative study

Identifying key health system components associated with improved outcomes to inform the re-configuration of services for adults with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a mixed-methods study

Time to start disease modifying drugs for adults with seropositive rheumatoid arthritis: results of the first year of the national New Zealand Rheumatology Association (NZRA) audit

Reproductive health needs of adolescent and young adult women with pediatric rheumatic diseases

Co-design of youth appropriate services for young people with rheumatic fever/rheumatic heart disease in Counties Manukau District

Factors for Consideration by Pediatric Rheumatologists When Scoring the Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: First Step Toward an Internal Consensus

Implementing a patient-initiated review system in rheumatoid arthritis: a qualitative evaluation

Satisfaction with rural rheumatology telemedicine service

Personalised care packages for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed-methods study

The roles of immuno-modulator treatment and echocardiographic screening in rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease control: research from Aotearoa, New Zealand

How do patients with rheumatoid arthritis perceive their self‐care and self‐care support? A mixed‐method study

Living with rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study

Identification of Five Quality Needs for Rheumatology (Text Analysis and Literature Review)

Improving access to care for rheumatology services in Canada

Creating space for Indigenous healing practices in patient care plans

Room for improvement in non-pharmacological systemic sclerosis care? — a cross-sectional online survey of 650 patients

The Benzathine Penicillin G (BPG) reformulation preferences study – the importance of cultural awareness and appropriate governance concerning Rheumatic Fever related research in New Zealand

Assessing acceptability and identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation of the EULAR recommendations for patient education in inflammatory arthritis: a mixed-methods study with rheumatology professionals in 23 European and Asian countries