24 CASP AND CAFASP EXPERIMENTS AND THEIR FINDINGS

P. Bourne

Abstract:The prediction of the three-dimensional (3D) structure of a protein from its onedimensional (1D) protein sequence is a much published and debated area of structural bioinformatics. This prediction involves the kind of fold that the given amino acid sequence may adopt; in other words, whether it takes a new fold or one of the existing folds? If the sequence takes one of the existing folds, which is the most suitable fold among the known folds (fold recognition). When fold recognition is apparent because of good sequence similarity to one of the known structures, then the question is how best can one model the structure of the given sequence, taking the relevant information from existing homologous structures in the protein data bank (comparative modeling). Alternatively, what if none of this information is available and the structure is modeled from first principles (ab initio)? What makes structure prediction (at least to this author’s knowledge) unique among scientific endeavors is the manner in which progress in the field is measured. The Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction (CASP) and the Critical Assessment of Fully Automated Structure Prediction (CAFASP) experiments provide a measure of this progress by attempting to measure in a quantitative way the success of many groups on a predefined set of structures. Beyond a measure of progress, as is true of all good experiments, they• suggest new ways of addressing the problem, and influence Q1 the results presented as subsequent CASPs and CAFASPs. The approach is for an independent group to solicit protein targets for use in CASP and CAFASP months in advance on their availability. The targets are NMR and X-ray protein structures comprising one or more domains either determined and not published or anticipated to be determined in time for review and to provide the sequence of those targets to the groups competing in CASP and CAFASP. These groups then make a