Roles of Progranulin and FRamides in Neural Versus Non-Neural Tissues on Dietary Restriction-Related Longevity and Proteostasis in C. elegans

Dilawar Ahmad Mir,Matthew Cox,Jordan Horrocks,Zhengxin Ma,Aric Rogers
Abstract:Dietary Restriction (DR) mitigates loss of proteostasis associated with aging that underlies neurodegenerative conditions including Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Previously, we observed increased translational efficiency of certain FMRFamide-Like neuro-Peptide (FLP) genes and the neuroprotective growth factor progranulin gene prgn-1 under dietary restriction in C. elegans. Here, we tested the effects of flp-5, flp-14, flp-15 and pgrn-1 on lifespan and proteostasis under both standard and dietary restriction conditions. We also tested and distinguished function based on their expression in either neuronal or non-neuronal tissue. Lowering the expression of pgrn-1 and flp genes selectively in neural tissue showed no difference in survival under normal feeding conditions nor under DR in two out of three experiments performed. Reduced expression of flp-14 in non-neuronal tissue showed decreased lifespan that was not specific to DR. With respect to proteostasis, a genetic model of DR from mutation of the eat-2 gene that showed increased thermotolerance compared to fully fed wild type animals demonstrated no change in thermotolerance in response to knockdown of pgrn-1 or flp genes. Finally, we tested effects on motility in a neural-specific model of proteotoxicity and found that neuronal knockdown of pgrn-1 and flp genes improved motility in early life regardless of diet. However, knocking these genes down in non-neuronal tissue had variable results. RNAi targeting flp-14 increased motility by day seven of adulthood regardless of diet. Interestingly, non-neuronal RNAi of pgrn-1 decreased motility under standard feeding conditions while DR increased motility for this gene knockdown by day seven (early mid-life). Results show that pgrn-1, flp-5, flp-14, and flp-15 do not have major roles in diet-related changes in longevity or whole-body proteostasis. However, reduced expression of these genes in neurons increases motility early in life in a neural-specific model of proteotoxicity, whereas knockdown of non-neuronal expression mostly increases motility in mid-life under the same conditions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?