[Analysis of Spatiotemporal Differences and Influencing Factors of Land Use Carbon Emissions in Ningxia]

Ya-Juan Wang,Chen-Xi Zhai,Cai-Yu Liu,Ze-Yu Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202310111
2024-09-08
Abstract:Analyzing the spatiotemporal differences in land use carbon emissions systematically and exploring their influencing factors for the rational allocation of land resources is of great importance and promoting collaborative emission reduction in this region. Based on the calculation of land use carbon emissions in Ningxia and its prefecture-level cities from 2000 to 2021, the regional differences in carbon emissions, economic efficiency, and carbon sink capacity were reflected through the difference index, carbon emission intensity, economic contribution rate, and carbon sink ecological carrying capacity. The results were as follows: ① From 2000 to 2021, the land use carbon emissions in Ningxia showed a significant increase by 110 919 400 t. Construction land was the main carbon source land, accounting for 99.57% of the total carbon emissions in 2021, and forest land was the main type of carbon absorption, accounting for 79.22% of the total carbon absorption in 2021. ② During the research period, the carbon emission difference among prefecture-level cities showed a trend of first rising and then slightly falling, with the gap reaching the maximum in 2016. ③ Although the overall difference in carbon emission intensity among prefecture-level cities showed a trend of narrowing and convergence, the economic contribution coefficient and carbon sink ecological carrying coefficient had significant differences, and the economic contribution rate and carbon emission contribution rate were both in a relatively unbalanced state, with obvious regional differences. ④ Land use carbon emission intensity, land use structure, economic development level, and population all played a promoting role in land use carbon emission, with contribution rates of 56.48%, 41.27%, 85.20%, and 9.29%, respectively. The contribution value of land use carbon intensity per unit GDP was negative, which inhibited the increase of land use carbon emission.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?