Uh and um in autism: The case of hesitation marker usage in Dutch-speaking autistic preschoolers

Marjolein Mues,Ellen Demurie,Maide Erdogan,Sarah Schaubroeck,Manon Krol,Amy Goodwin,Jan Buitelaar,Eva Loth,Herbert Roeyers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000924000321
2024-09-25
Abstract:English-speaking autistic children use the hesitation marker um less often than non-autistic children but use uh at a similar rate. It is unclear why this is the case. We employed a sample of Dutch-speaking children from the Preschool Brain Imaging and Behavior Project to examine hesitation markers in autistic and non-autistic preschoolers with the aim to 1) make a crosslinguistic comparison of hesitation marker usage and 2) examine hypotheses regarding the underlying linguistic mechanisms of hesitation markers: the symptom hypothesis and the signal hypothesis. We found initial group differences in all hesitation markers but these results were rendered insignificant after controlling for age, sex and nonverbal cognition. We found significant correlations between hesitation marker usage and expressive and receptive language, but not autism traits. Lastly, we show interesting cross-linguistic differences in hesitation marker usage between Dutch-speaking participants and previously described English-speaking participants, such as a preference for um over uh.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?