Centromeric alphoid DNA heteromorphisms of chromosome 22 revealed by FISH‐technique

T. Liehr,R. Pfeiffer,U. Trautmann,E. Gebhart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.1998.tb02686.x
1998-03-01
Clinical Genetics
Abstract:To the Editor: We read with interest the article of Verma et al. (1) regarding heteromorphisms of the centromeric alphoid DNA of chromosome 21. They pointed out, that the size of this region can vary between absent, small, medium, large and very large. The two groups with small and absent signals, respectively, present in about 25% of the studied chromosome 21 cases, are of special interest for the interpretation of interphase cytogenetics results. However, it would be of importance to know if this size variation can be observed exclusively in chromosome 21, or in other chromosomes, too. We performed a comparable investigation with the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniqiue using the commercially available biotin-labeled alpha satellite DNA probe specific for D22Z1 and D14Z1 (Oncor) of chromosomes 22 and 14. It seems to exist a similar range of chromosomes 22 presenting with small to (nearly) absent alphoid regions as it has been proven by Verma et al. (1) for chromosome 21. We studied in summary ten cases with different chromosome 22 marker chromosomes. Five cases of Philadelphia chromosome positive chronic myeloic leukemias (CML) (2, 3) and five cases of patients suffering from cat eye syndrome (CES) (4). In each CML case two different alphoid regions of chromosome 22 could be analyzed, in the CES cases three different ones, due to the dicentric marker chromosome 22. For one of five cases each, a polymorphism of one chromosome 22, with small to almost absent alphoid region was identified (Fig. 1). In summary, two of 25 studied alphoid regions of chromosome 22 (8%) presented with almost undetectable alphoid regions in the metaphase and were completely undetectable in the interphase nuclei. Thus, the interpretation of results in interphase cytogenetic studies using alphoid DNA-probes must be done very carefully, especially, using the probes for chromosomes 13/21 and 14/22. Interestingly, neither Verma and colleagues reported comparable size variations in the alphoid region of chromosome 13, nor were variations found in the alphoid regions of chromosome 14. Nevertheless more data, particularly on the range of polymorphisms with absent and small aiphoid regions for all the other human chromosomes would be desirable.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?