Abstract:Background Healthcare professionals (HCPs) have a responsibility to conduct assessments of decision‐making capacity that comply with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA). Current best‐practice guidance, such as the Mental Capacity Code of Practice and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence decision‐making and mental capacity guidance, does not stipulate how to accomplish this in practice, for example, what questions should be asked, how options and information should be provided. In addition, HCPs struggle to assess the capacity of individuals with communication difficulties. Aims This study was a service evaluation that aimed to objectively analyse, using Conversation Analysis (CA), how real‐life capacity assessments were conducted in a hospital setting with patients with acquired brain injury (ABI)‐related communication difficulties. A second aim was to establish the feasibility of using CA to advance knowledge of the conduct of capacity assessment. Methods & Procedures Four naturally occurring capacity assessments were video‐recorded. Recordings involved speech and language therapists, occupational therapists, neuropsychologists and patients with communication difficulties as a result of ABI. The methods and findings of CA were used to investigate the interactional behaviours of HCPs and patients during assessments of decision‐making capacity. The analysis was informed by our knowledge of the MCA best practice guidance. Outcomes & Results An overall structure of capacity assessment that enacted some of the best‐practice MCA guidance was identified in one recording, consisting of six phases: (i) opening, (ii) preparation, (iii) option‐listing, (iv) test, (v) decision, and (vi) close. The preparation phase consisted of two sub‐components: information gathering and information giving. Variation from this structure was observed across the dataset, notably in the way in which options were (or were not) presented. Conclusions & Implications CA is a feasible empirical method for exploring the structure and conduct of capacity assessments. CA identifies and provides ways of describing interactional behaviours that align with and diverge from best‐practice MCA guidance. Future CA studies including a wider range of health and social care professionals and patients have the potential to inform evidence based training for HCPs who conduct assessments of decision‐making capacity. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject The Mental Capacity Act (MCA) is poorly implemented in practice. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) find it challenging to assess the decision‐making capacity of individuals with communication difficulties, and people with communication difficulties are often excluded from or insufficiently supported during capacity assessment. Research is limited to self‐report methods. Observational studies of capacity assessment are required. What this study adds This is the first study to use Conversation Analysis (CA) to explore how capacity assessments are conducted in a hospital setting by HCPs with people with communication difficulties as a result of acquired brain injury. One video‐recorded capacity assessment was structured in six phases that aligned with best practice MCA guidance. However, other capacity assessments deviated from this structure. One phase, option listing, varied in practice and options were not always presented. What are the clinical implications of this work? CA revealed interactional behaviours that align with and diverge from best‐practice MCA guidance. Future CA studies are warranted to inform training for health and social care professionals who conduct capacity assessments.

Decision-making capacity assessments in New Zealand and Australia: a systematised review

Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand

FC28: Medical Assistance in Dying and assessment of decisional capacity in dementia: the Dutch Perspective!

A scoping review of decision‐making tools to support substitute decision‐makers for adults with impaired capacity

Decision-Making Capacity in Healthcare: Instruments Review and Reflections About its Assessment in the Elderly with Cognitive Impairment and Dementia

Australian medical practitioners' perspectives about current practice relating to fitness to drive assessment for older people with dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A qualitative study

Factors That Influence Access to Medical Assistance in Dying Services: An Integrative Review

Capacity assessment for euthanasia in dementia: A qualitative study of 60 Dutch cases

Decision making capacity for treatment in psychiatric inpatients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Decision-making capacity: from testing to evaluation

Decision aids to support decision-making in dementia care: a systematic review

Decision-Making in People With Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Narrative Review of Decision-Making Tools

The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tools for assessing decision-making capacity in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis

The representation of Australians living with dementia in voluntary assisted dying research: A scoping review

Patient competence and professional incompetence: disagreements in capacity assessments in one Australian jurisdiction, and their educational implications

Ageing and Decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Processes of consent in research for adults with impaired mental capacity nearing the end of life: systematic review and transparent expert consultation (MORECare_Capacity statement)

Determining medical decision-making capacity in brain tumor patients: why and how?

A meta-synthesis exploring nurses' experiences of assisted dying and participation decision-making

Agency in dementia care: systematic review and meta-ethnography

Using Conversation Analysis to explore assessments of decision‐making capacity in a hospital setting