INTRACELLULAR pH—TRUE PARAMETER OR MISNOMER? *

B. Siesjö,U. Pontén
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1966.tb50711.x
IF: 6.499
1966-04-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:It is an unfortunate fact tha t so much effort is directed towards means of measuring or calculating “intracellular pH,” which in the strict sense is immeasurable and incalculable. Thus, although the term pH is established and extensively used, its application to tissues is opposed to available theory. The difficulties stem from the fact that tissues are collodial systems with compartments. The collodial nature of tissue fluids, in connection with the relatively high ionic strength, will make the assumptions regarding liquid junction potentials uncertain. An even worse obstacle is the inevitable fact that all tissues are divided into compartments, and this obstacle concerns both types of methods used for measuring tissue acid-base relations, viz. direct measurements with glass electrodes, and calculations from the equilibrium distribution of weak acids and bases. Direct pH measurements have given valuable information on intracellular bulk fluid changes (Caldwell 1958; Spyropoulos 1960), and the method has been brought to a high degree of development with the introduction of electrodes of ultramicro size (Kostyuk & Sorokina, 1960). There are, however, several uncertain features and drawbacks. Thus, technically i t may be possible to insert a glass electrode and a reference electrode into large cells of a fairly homogenous tissue, like muscle, but probably very difficult in other tissues, like the brain, where stable membrane potentials are not readily obtained. Furthermore, the validity of the absolute values observed is uncertain. This is partly due to the unknown liquid junction potential, partly to uncertainty regarding the physical nature of the intracellular contents. If the cell interior can be regarded as a continuous and homogenous fluid phase, electrode measurements are more easily interpreted. However, if the cell is regarded highly organized at the subcellular level, attempts to correlate electrometric “pH” with various cellular events can always be criticized on grounds that the measurement and the process under study may be confined to different compartments in the cell (c.f. MacLaren 1959). This is especially evident if the system under study is confined to non-aqeous parts of the cell, e.g. the cell membrane, or t o membrane-confined regions within the cell, e.g. the mitochondrion. Calculation o f tissue acid-base events from the equilibrium distribution of a weak acid or base has the advantage tha t it involves all tissue compartments,
What problem does this paper attempt to address?