Characterizing Myasthenia Gravis Symptoms, Exacerbations, and Crises From Neurologist's Clinical Notes Using Natural Language Processing
Jonathan D Darer,Jacqueline Pesa,Zia Choudhry,Alberto E Batista,Purva Parab,Xiaoyun Yang,Raghav Govindarajan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.65792
2024-07-30
Cureus
Abstract:Background Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a rare, autoantibody neuromuscular disorder characterized by fatigable weakness. Real-world evidence based on administrative and structured datasets regarding MG may miss important details related to the clinical encounter. Examination of free-text clinical progress notes has the potential to illuminate aspects of MG care. Objective The primary objective was to examine and characterize neurologist progress notes in the care of individuals with MG regarding the prevalence of documentation of clinical subtypes, antibody status, symptomatology, and MG deteriorations, including exacerbations and crises. The secondary objectives were to categorize MG deteriorations into practical, objective states as well as examine potential sources of clinical inertia in MG care. Methods We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of de-identified neurologist clinical notes from 2017 to 2022. A qualitative analysis of physician descriptions of MG deteriorations and a discussion of risks in MG care (risk for adverse effects, risk for clinical decompensation, etc.) was performed. Results Of the 3,085 individuals with MG, clinical subtypes and antibody status identified included gMG (n = 400; 13.0%), ocular MG (n = 253; 8.2%), MG unspecified (2,432; 78.8%), seropositivity for acetylcholine receptor antibody (n = 441; 14.3%), and MuSK antibody (n = 29; 0.9%). The most common gMG manifestations were dysphagia (n = 712; 23.0%), dyspnea (n = 626; 20.3%), and dysarthria (n = 514; 16.7%). In MG crisis patients, documentation of difficulties with MG standard therapies was common (n = 62; 45.2%). The qualitative analysis of MG deterioration types includes symptom fluctuation, symptom worsening with treatment intensification, MG deterioration with rescue therapy, and MG crisis. Qualitative analysis of MG-related risks included the toxicity of new therapies and concern for worsening MG because of changing therapies. Conclusions This study of neurologist progress notes demonstrates the potential for real-world evidence generation in the care of individuals with MG. MG patients suffer fluctuating symptomatology and a spectrum of clinical deteriorations. Adverse effects of MG therapies are common, highlighting the need for effective, less toxic treatments.