Factors influencing the growth of multiple-tree infestations ofDendroctonus frontalis

W. S. Fargo,T. Wagner,R. Coulson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02515477

1985-06-01

Researches on Population Ecology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication: a Long-Term Follow-up Study on the Complications, Body Mass Index Changes, Endoscopic Findings and Causes of Revision

Mohamed Ibrahim,Mohamed Hany,Ahmed Zidan,Anwar Ashraf Abouelnasr,Ghada Ahmed Abu-Sheasha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05683-5

2021-09-17

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:BackgroundBariatric surgery has been increasingly becoming popular due to the advancements in minimally invasive approaches and techniques. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes and clinical relevance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) in a matched controlled single-bariatric centre study.MethodsWe collected data from 163 patients who underwent either LSG or LGCP over a period of at least 5 years. The outcome parameters included body mass index (BMI) changes, causes of revision surgery, endoscopic findings and effects on obesity-related comorbidities.ResultsA total of 79 patients underwent LGCP, while 84 underwent LSG for morbid obesity. At the fifth year of follow-up, a BMI of < 30 was achieved in 1% of patients who underwent LGCP (n = 1) compared with more than 80% of patients who underwent LSG (n = 70). Revision was mainly due to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or bile reflux in the LSG group and due to weight gain in the LGCP group. LSG was superior in improvements in comorbidities. The most observed endoscopic finding was GERD (grade a, b) in the LSG group and unfolding of part of or the whole stomach in the LGCP group. Early minor postoperative complications occurred at a significantly lower frequency in the LSG group.ConclusionsLGCP has a higher rate of complications, a much less durable effect on weight loss, a higher rate of revision surgery and a higher cost burden to the health care system than LSG.

surgery
Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Dijian Shen,Huan Ye,Yuedong Wang,Yun Ji,Xiaoli Zhan,Jinhui Zhu,Wei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2805-y

2013-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) is an emerging restrictive bariatric procedure that successfully reduces the gastric volume by plication of the gastric greater curvature. The aim of this prospective nonrandomized study was to compare short-term outcomes and associated complications between LGCP and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).METHODS:From January 2011 to November 2011, a total of 39 patients were allocated to undergo either LGCP (n = 19) or LSG (n = 20). Data on the operative time, complications, hospital stay, overall cost of LSG and LGCP, body mass index loss (BMIL), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), loss of appetite and improvement of comorbidities were collected during the follow-up examinations.RESULTS:All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The mean operative time was 95.0 ± 17.4 minutes for the LGCP group and 85.5 ± 18.4 minutes for the LSG group (P = 0.107). No patient required reoperation due to an early complication. One patient in the LSG group was readmitted because of gastric stenosis. The mean hospital stay was 4.2 ± 1.9 days in the LGCP group and 3.9 ± 1.7 days in the LSG group (P = 0.595). The total cost of LSG was $7,826 ± 537 compared to LGCP ($3,358 ± 264) (P < 0.001). One year after surgery, the mean %EWL was 58.8 ± 16.7 % (n = 11) in the LGCP group and 80.0 ± 26.8 % (n = 11) in the LSG group (P = 0.038). Loss of feeling of hunger was reported in 27.3 % LGCP patients and 72.7 % LSG patients (P = 0.033) at 1 year after surgery. The comorbidities, including diabetes, sleep apnea and hypertension, were markedly improved in both groups 6 months after surgery.CONCLUSIONS:The short-term outcomes of our study demonstrate that compared with LSG, LGCP is inferior as a restrictive procedure for weight loss, despite its significantly smaller cost. Longer follow-up and prospective comparative trials are needed to confirm the long-term outcomes of this novel procedure and make definitive conclusions.
Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy Plus Fundoplication versus Sleeve Gastrectomy alone for Treatment of Severe Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jing Hong LOO,Koy Min CHUE,Chin Hong LIM,Bin Chet TOH,Gamage Manisha Daminda KARIYAWASAM,Lester Wei Lin ONG,Jeremy Tian Hui TAN,Wai Keong WONG,Baldwin Po Man YEUNG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.12.007

IF: 3.709

2023-12-14

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract:Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a widely performed bariatric surgery but is associated with an increased risk of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in the long-term. Addition of a fundoplication to LSG may improve lower oesophageal sphincter function and reduce postoperative GERD. Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of SG plus fundoplication (SG + F) versus SG alone for the treatment of severe obesity ≥35 kg/m 2 . Setting Meta-analysis Methods 3 electronic databases were searched from inception till January 2023. Studies were included if they compared outcomes of SG + F versus SG in patients with severe obesity ≥ 35 kg/m 2 . The primary outcome was remission of GERD postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), postoperative complication rate, operative time, and length of stay. Results A total of 5 studies with 539 subjects (212 SG + F and 327 SG alone) were included. The mean preoperative BMI was 42.6 kg/m 2 . SG + F achieved higher remission of GERD compared to LSG (Odds Ratio (OR): 13.13, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 3.54, 48.73 I 2 = 0%). However, %TWL was lower in the SG + F group (Mean difference (MD): -2.75, 95% CI: -4.28, -1.23, I 2 = 0%), while there was no difference in %EWL (MD: -0.64, 95% CI: -20.62-19.34, I 2 = 83%). There were higher postoperative complications in SG + F (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.12-5.87, I 2 = 0%) as well. There was no difference in operative time or length of stay between the 2 groups. Conclusion SG + F achieved better GERD remission, but is associated with lesser weight loss and increased postoperative complications compared to SG alone. Further studies are required to ascertain the overall clinical benefit of SG + F for patients with severe obesity.

surgery
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Md Asif Jalal,Qiuye Cheng,Michael B. Edye

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04591-4

2020-04-17

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:PurposeEndoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) has grown in popularity as a potential minimally invasive bariatric procedure with acceptable short- and medium-term outcomes. This review aims to assess the safety and weight loss outcomes of ESG and compare it with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).Material and MethodsA comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and World Wide Web was conducted.ResultsFive studies were reviewed, three ESG cohort studies and two case-matched cohort studies comparing ESG with LSG. Total unique ESG and LSG patients were 1451 and 203, respectively. All papers demonstrated a modest short-term total body weight loss (TBWL%) at 6 months ranging from 13.7 to 15.2% for ESG. Comparably, the two LSG papers demonstrated a superior TBWL% of 23.5 and 23.6% at 6 months, with one paper reporting a 12-month TBWL% of 29.3%. Two ESG papers reported medium-term results at 18 and 24 months of 14.8% and 18.6%, respectively. Excluding Clavien-Dindo 1 complications, ESG had a complication rate between 2.0 and 2.7%, while comparatively, LSG had a complication rate between 9.2 and 16.9% (current literature reported as 8.7%). In both procedures, there were no grade IV or V complications.ConclusionESG when compared with LSG has lower short-term weight loss outcomes with fewer complications. Weight loss results for ESG appear to plateau after the 1-year mark. The future and uptake of ESG as a minimally invasive bariatric procedure will be determined by its long-term data on potential weight loss sustainability.

surgery
Safety and cost of performing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with same day discharge at a large academic hospital

Joshua P. Landreneau,Divyansh Agarwal,Elan Witkowski,Ozanan Meireles,Karen Flanders,Matthew Hutter,Denise Gee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10673-6

2024-02-22

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common surgical treatment for morbid obesity. While certain specialized ambulatory surgery centers offer LSG on an outpatient basis, patients undergoing LSG at most academic centers are admitted to hospital for initial postoperative convalescence and monitoring. Our institution has begun to offer LSG with same-day discharge (SDD) in select patients. We aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and costs for patients undergoing LSG with inpatient admission versus SDD.

surgery
Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Regarding Efficacy and Safety: a Meta-Analysis

Qinghuang Ye,Yan Chen,Xiaoli Zhan,Yuedong Wang,Jinhui Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2630-9

2017-01-01

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic greater curvature plication (LGCP) are two restrictive bariatric procedures. Eight studies (three randomized, controlled trials, four retrospective studies, and one prospective study) with 536 patients on LSG and LGCP were included by searching PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The software Review Manager 5.3 was used to evaluate operation time, adverse events, percent excess weight loss (%EWL), resolution of obesity-related comorbidities, and postoperative hospital stay. Despite the limitations, this meta-analysis suggests that LSG is superior to LGCP in terms of providing greater %EWL at the follow-up of 3, 6, and 12 months and 3 years. LSG gains shorter postoperative hospital stay than LGCP. No significant difference was found in operation time, adverse events, and the resolution of obesity-related comorbidities.
Impacts of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease in severely obese Korean patients

Yeon-Ju Huh,Jong Seob Park,Sol Lee,Sang-Moon Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.03.047

Abstract:Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has established popularity as a bariatric and metabolic surgery. However, the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following LSG is controversial. This study aims to describe the prevalence of de novo GERD after LSG. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for 130 patients who underwent a routine endoscopic surveillance before and after LSG between January 2013 and October 2018. The diagnosis of GERD was determined by presence of symptoms, history of PPI treatment, and endoscopic findings. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed annually after LSG and/or when the patients complained of severe reflux symptoms. Results: The prevalence of GERD before surgery was 18.5%. At 1 year after LSG, GERD was present in 70 (53.8%) of the 130 patients. GERD consisted of 55 patients with newly developed GERD, and 15 with preexisting GERD. 9 (37.5%) out of pre-existing GERD patients were free of symptoms and abnormal finding at EGD following LSG. During the LSG, 66 (50.8%) patients with hiatal hernia underwent re-approximation of the diaphragmatic crura. There was no significant relationship between hiatal hernia repair and postoperative GERD (p = 0.39). Number of patients taking PPI medication before and after LSG were 34 (26.2%) and 49 (37.7%). Out of 56 (43.1%) patients with endoscopic lesions, LA grade A was 31 (23.9%), B = 15 (11.5%), C = 4 (3.1%), and D = 6 (4.6%). Conclusion: In this study, 42.3% (n = 55) of total patients developed newly developed GERD, and 7.7% (n = 10) had LA grade C or D esophagitis.
Efficient and Robust Semi-supervised Learning Over a Sparse-Regularized Graph

Hang Su,Jun Zhu,Zhaozheng Yin,Yinpeng Dong,Bo Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46484-8_35

2016-10-08

Abstract:
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs one-anastomosis gastric bypass 5-year follow-up: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Mohamed Hany,Ahmed Zidan,Moustafa R Aboelsoud,Bart Torensma,Moustafa R. Aboelsoud

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.01.038

2024-02-01

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract:Background Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide, while one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is the third most performed procedure; both have reported good weight loss (WL) and low complications; however, should both have differences in the durability of weight loss and malnutrition? Methods A single-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the outcomes of LSG and OAGB over a 5 follow-up and included 300 patients. Primary endpoint was WL in percentages of total WL (%TWL) and excess WL (%EWL). Secondary endpoints were complications, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), associated medical problems, bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS) assessment, and weight recurrence (WR). Results In total, 201 patients (96 LSG and 105 OAGB) completed 5 years of follow-up. OAGB had significantly higher %TWL and %EWL than LSG throughout follow-up. LSG had significantly higher WR and GERD. Both had significant improvement in associated medical problems and BAROS scores compared to baseline, with no significant differences. WR was associated with higher relapse of associated medical conditions after initial remission and with lower BAROS scores regarding weight loss scores. Conclusions OAGB had significantly higher WL, less WR, and less GERD. However, it had a higher incidence of bile reflux. Both procedures had comparable complication rates, excellent remissions in associated medical problems, and improved QoL. WR was associated with significantly more relapse of associated medical problems, and significantly lower BAROS scores.

gastroenterology & hepatology,surgery
Oversewing and Gastropexy in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy - Two Futile Steps of the Procedure? An Observational Case-Control Study

Daniela T Sala,Stefania R Fodor,Septimiu Voidăzan,Mariana C Tilinca,Adriana M Gomotîrceanu,Ion C Puiac,Marius I Ciorba,Renata Moriczi,Botond I Kiss,Razvan M Ion,Constantin Calin,Radu Mircea Neagoe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06681-5

Abstract:Purpose: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular primary bariatric metabolic procedure worldwide but severe complications are still reported, and there is no ideal technique to avoid them. This study analyses the impact of oversewing (OS) and gastropexy (GP) on complication rate, early dyspeptic and late de novo GERD symptoms after LSG. Material and method: A case-control study was conducted on patients with obesity who underwent LSG. The total cohort was divided in group A (control group) - patients with no oversewing (OS) or gastropexy (GP), group B - patients with OS but no gastropexy and group C - patients with both OS and GP performed during LSG. Results: We included 272 patients with obesity with a mean BMI 42.9±6.94 kg/m2, 96 patients in group A, 90 patients in group B and 86 in group C with no statistical differences between them. We had 5 cases of postoperative hemorrhage (4 in group A) and three patients who developed leaks (2 in group A and one in group B). Prolonged and severe early dyspeptic episodes and after 6 months reflux symptoms were significantly more in groups A and B (p<0.05). The operative time was longer in group B and C (p<0.05) but with no difference in procedure -related morbidity and in hospital length of stay. Conclusion: Adding both OS and GP to LSG reduce complications rate with no influence on procedure-related postoperative morbidity and in-hospital length of stay. GP reduces early postoperative dyspeptic and de novo GERD symptoms after LSG.
Efficacy of Nissen Sleeve Gastrectomy on Mid-term Barrett's Esophagus Regression

Pierre Brinas,Saadeddine Joumaa,Andrew Currie,Mégane Boixière,Jean Christophe Valat,Marius Nedelcu,Ion Donici,Thomas Gautier,David Nocca

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-07034-y

2024-01-07

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:Sleeve gastrectomy is the most commonly performed bariatric operation globally. The main complication is GERD. In the medium term, it can increase the incidence of Barrett's esophagus (BE), which is a risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Following conventional sleeve gastrectomy, BE is noted in up to 16% of patients postoperatively. Recently, Nissen sleeve gastrectomy (NSG) has been shown to reduce the frequency of postoperative GERD compared to conventional sleeve gastrectomy. This study aims to evaluate the impact of NSG on the incidence and remission of BE in the long term.

surgery
Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Worsen Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Obese Patients? A Prospective Study

Andrea Balla,Livia Palmieri,Diletta Corallino,Francesca Meoli,Maria Carlotta Sacchi,Emanuela Ribichini,Annamaria Pronio,Danilo Badiali,Alessandro M Paganini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506211052745

Abstract:Background: To evaluate the impact of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and gastric bypass (LGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods: GERD was evaluated by the Modified Italian Gastroesophageal reflux disease-Health-Related Quality of Life (MI-GERD-HRQL) questionnaire, pH-manometry, endoscopy, and Rx-esophagogram, before and 12 months after surgery. Based on these exams, patients without GERD underwent LSG, and patients with GERD underwent LGB. Results: Thirteen and six patients underwent LSG and LGB, respectively. After LSG, the only statistically significant difference observed at pH-manometry was the median DeMeester score, from 5.7 to 22.7 (P = .0026). De novo GERD occurred in 6 patients (46.2%), with erosive esophagitis in one. The median MI-GERD-HRQL score improved from 3 to 0. Overall, nine patients underwent LGB, but three were lost to follow-up. Preoperative pH-manometry changed the surgical indication from LSG to LGB in 7 out of 9 patients (77.8%). Six patients who underwent LGB completed the study, and at pH-manometry, statistically significant differences were observed in the percentage of total acid exposure time, with the number of reflux episodes lasting >5 minutes and DeMeester score (P = .009). The median MI-GERD-HRQL score improved from 6.5 to 0. Statistically significant differences were not observed at endoscopy and Rx-esophagogram findings in both groups. Conclusions: LSG has a negative impact on GERD, even in patients without preoperative GERD. LGB confirmed to be the intervention of choice in patients with GERD. Preoperative pH-manometry may identify patients with silent GERD, to candidate them to LGB rather than LSG. pH-manometry should be used more liberally to establish the correct surgical indication on objective grounds.
Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: An Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database

Noah C. Wilson,Danielle B. Dilsaver,Ryan W. Walters,Kalyana C. Nandipati

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07111-w

2024-02-27

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Purpose Bariatric surgery has been reported to produce durable weight loss in the management of obesity; sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric procedure. Obesity is a common comorbidity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and the impact of IBD on short-term SG outcomes has not been widely reported. This study assessed whether IBD was associated with adverse post-SG outcomes. Materials and Methods Hospitalizations of patients undergoing SG in the United States were identified using the 2010–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) and stratified by IBD diagnosis. The SG cohort was propensity-matched based on age, biological sex, body mass index (BMI), comorbid diabetes, hypertension, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and discharge in quarter four. Primary aims were to compare in-hospital mortality, post-operative complications, and all-cause 90-day readmission between patients with and without IBD. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS) and total hospital cost. Results A total of 2030 hospitalizations were matched. The odds of complication were 48% higher for hospitalizations of patients with IBD (11.1% vs. 7.8%; aOR 1.48, aOR 95% CI 1.10–2.00, p = .009). The most common complication was nausea (4.9% vs. 3.7%, p = .187). No statistically significant difference was observed for all-cause 90-day readmissions, LOS, or hospital cost. Conclusion Hospitalizations of patients with IBD who underwent SG experienced significantly higher post-operative complication rates. However, the similar lengths of stay and readmission rates compared to propensity-matched SG hospitalizations without IBD suggest many complications were minor. SG remains a safe weight loss procedure for patients suffering from IBD and obesity. Graphical Abstract

surgery
Early experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage bariatric procedure

Catherine E Lewis,Andrew Dhanasopon,Erik P Dutson,Amir Mehran

Abstract:Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as a single-stage restrictive bariatric procedure is becoming increasingly popular, especially in patients who are high risk and/or superobese. Between November 21, 2006, and September 30, 2008, 42 patients underwent LSG at our institution. Average age was 47 +/- 11 years, average body mass index was 54 +/- 10 kg/m2, and 62 per cent were female. Preoperative indications for LSG included contraindication to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (n = 11), severe coronary artery disease and/or congestive heart failure (n = 3), significant liver disease (n = 3), and patient preference (n = 4). Intraoperative indications for LSG included a foreshortened mesentery with inability to create a gastrojejunostomy (n = 13), extensive adhesions (n = 5), and intraoperative findings concerning for cirrhosis (n = 3). Twelve complications occurred in six patients: laparoscopic to open conversion (n = 1), reoperation (n = 3), nosocomial pneumonia (n = 1), wound infection (n = 1), bleeding (n = 1), pulmonary embolus (n = 1), readmission (n = 3), and superior splenic pole infarction. There was one death resulting from pulmonary embolism that occurred 2 weeks postoperatively. Preliminary excess body weight loss at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months was 29, 32 t, 38, and 30 per cent, respectively, and many patients had improvement or resolution of obesity-related comorbidities. Early review of our experience demonstrates that LSG may be an effective single-stage bariatric procedure. Additional follow up will be necessary to better define its long-term safety and efficacy.
Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Denmark from 2010 to 2016: a nationwide cohort study

Johanne Gormsen,Inge Marie Poulsen,Anne Samsøe Engberg,Sune Brinch Erichsen,Cecilie Brandt Lassen,Frederik Helgstrand

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2024.01.015

IF: 3.709

2024-02-21

Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

Abstract:Background Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment of morbid obesity and obesity-related conditions. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become increasingly popular in Denmark and worldwide. Objective To evaluate long-term outcomes including postoperative complications after LSG. Setting University Hospitals, Denmark. Methods This was a nationwide multicenter cohort study including all patients who underwent LSG during 2010 to 2016 in Denmark. Data were collected from the Danish Obesity Surgery Registry and medical records. Representatives from all public bariatric centers in Denmark registered information on demography, indication, preoperative tests, operative information, weight loss, status of co-morbidities, and early and late complications. Results In total, 541 patients were included in the study. Median follow-up was 6 years, and 536 patients (99%) were available at the end of follow-up. The patients achieved a persistent weight loss. Quality of life significantly improved after both 12 and 24 months. Overall, 3% of the patients had a major complication ≤30 days after the procedure and 3% underwent reoperation. One in 5 patients (22%) had an early minor complication. In the long term, 3% of the patients had a major complication and 24% of the patients had ≥1 minor complication. The most common surgery-related healthcare contacts addressed gastroesophageal reflux, weight recurrence, and stenosis symptoms. Conclusions Patients after LSG achieved sufficient weight loss and improved quality of life. The procedure was safe with low risk of early and late major complications. However, there was a high frequency of early and late minor complications in 22% and 24% of the patients, respectively.

surgery
Investigation of the Relationship Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using 24-hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance With pH Testing According to Current Consensus

Emre Teke,Nuriye Esen Bulut,Ender Onur,Yasin Güneş,Mehmet Mahir Fersahoglu,Anil Ergin,İksan Taşdelen,Mehmet Köroğlu,Bilger Çavuş,Ümit Akyüz,Filiz Akyüz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001253

2024-02-01

Abstract:Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a popular weight loss procedure with potential effects on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, research on the association between LSG and GERD using objective evaluation criteria, such as multichannel intraluminal impedance combined with pH testing (MII-pH), is limited. This study aimed to investigate the impact of LSG on GERD using MII-pH and current consensus guidelines. Materials and methods: It was conducted as a prospective clinical study on 33 patients who underwent LSG between January 2022 and August 2022. MII-pH and high-resolution manometry were performed preoperatively and 3 to 6 months postoperatively. GERD diagnosis was based on MII-pH results using the Lyon and Update Porto consensus guidelines. Results: Postoperative MII-pH analysis revealed a significant increase in acid reflux time, acid exposure time, reflux index, esophageal clearance, total reflux time, and longest reflux period. Weak acid reflux episodes decreased, while Demeester score and alkaline reflux showed nonsignificant increases. Pathologic reflux significantly increased postoperatively based on MII-pH diagnosis. High-resolution manometry showed a significant increase in unsuccessful motility. Conclusion: Although the Demeester score calculation consists of 6 metrics, including acid exposure time, the acid exposure time is more specific in detecting pathologic reflux. Pathologic GERD increases significantly with LSG in the early period. Therefore, preoperative and postoperative endoscopy and MII-pH can provide valuable information regarding the need for closer follow-up after LSG.
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: can it be considered a definitive procedure?

Ajay Chopra,Edward Chao,Yana Etkin,Lynn Merklinger,Jayne Lieb,Harry Delany

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1960-2

2011-12-17

Surgical Endoscopy

Abstract:BackgroundProviding bariatric surgery services to an inner-city population is a challenge. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is an effective operation for morbid obesity with a relatively low complication rate. LSG appears to be a suitable alternative procedure for this group of patients.MethodsThis is a retrospective review and analysis of the experience with 185 consecutive LSGs that had completed at least 6 months follow-up. Eleven conversions from LSG to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were excluded, leaving 174 patients for outcome analysis. Data collected were patient demographics, body mass index (BMI), comorbid conditions, operating time, length of hospital stay, and perioperative complications. Weight loss and resolution/improvement of comorbidities were analyzed.ResultsMean patient age was 39.58 years and mean BMI was 48.97 kg/m2. The percentage of patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2 was 37.94%. Mean excess weight loss (EWL) was 44.76, 55.52, 59.22, and 58.92% at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Six patients (3.24%) lost less than 25% EWL. Thirteen patients (7.02%) regained an average of 13 lb after reaching a plateau. Resolution/improvement of comorbidities was 84% for diabetes mellitus, 49.99% for hypertension, 90% for asthma, 90.74% for obstructive sleep apnea, and 45.92% for gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (GERD). The mortality rate was zero in this series. Perioperative complications occurred in 26 patients (14.05%): four staple-line leaks (2.16%), four bleeds (2.16%), four obstructions (2.16%), five vomiting/dehydration (2.70%), six new onset of GERD symptoms (3.24%), two with pneumonia (1.08%), and one with pulmonary embolism (0.54%).ConclusionLSG results in stable and adequate weight loss with resolution/improvement in comorbidities in a high percentage of patients. It can be considered a definitive operation for morbid obesity.
Incidence of Post-operative Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disorder in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ander Bengoechea Trujillo,Drishti Sagar,Amoolya Rao Amaravadhi,Devika Muraleedharan,Muhammad Zauraiz Malik,Kofi Effa-Ababio,Mugisha Nsengiyumva,Tadele Tesfaye,Maciej Walędziak,Anna Różańska-Walędziak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-024-07163-y

2024-03-15

Obesity Surgery

Abstract:Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common concern following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This paper aimed to assess the incidence of reflux disease following these bariatric procedures. A literature search was conducted to identify observational studies and clinical trials reporting patients developed GERD disease after LSG. Twenty-two studies included in the analysis, involve 20,495 participants, indicated that the estimated proportion of patients who developed post-surgery GERD was 0.35 (95% CI 0.30–0.41). Subgroup analysis revealed a proportion of 0.33 (95% CI 0.27–0.38) in observational studies and 0.58 (95% CI 0.39–0.75) in clinical trials. High heterogeneity was noted across studies ( I 2 = 98%). Sensitivity analyses and publication bias assessments were performed to enhance the robustness of the results. Our findings highlight a moderate to high risk of developing GERD following LSG surgery.

surgery
Possible route of antigen uptake by the Harderian gland of the domestic fowl.

R. Burns

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071667708416380

1977-07-01

British Poultry Science

Abstract:India ink and colloidal gold dropped on to the eyeball of chickens travelled up the secretory duct to reach the Harderian gland. 2. It is suggested that this is the route by which exogenous antigens reach the gland.
Harmonic oscillator driven by a quantum current.

J. Slosser,Pierre Meystre,S. Braunstein

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.63.934

IF: 8.6

1989-08-28

Physical Review Letters

Abstract:We show that under certain circumstances a simple quantum harmonic oscillator driven by a quantum current evolves to unique pure states even if started as a mixed state. In various limits, these states exhibit nonclassical properties such as sub-Poissonian statistics, or more interestingly resemble macroscopic superpositions

Factors influencing the growth of multiple-tree infestations ofDendroctonus frontalis

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication: a Long-Term Follow-up Study on the Complications, Body Mass Index Changes, Endoscopic Findings and Causes of Revision

Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Effectiveness of Sleeve Gastrectomy Plus Fundoplication versus Sleeve Gastrectomy alone for Treatment of Severe Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty with Comparison to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Safety and cost of performing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with same day discharge at a large academic hospital

Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Laparoscopic Greater Curvature Plication Regarding Efficacy and Safety: a Meta-Analysis

Impacts of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease in severely obese Korean patients

Efficient and Robust Semi-supervised Learning Over a Sparse-Regularized Graph

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs one-anastomosis gastric bypass 5-year follow-up: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Oversewing and Gastropexy in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy - Two Futile Steps of the Procedure? An Observational Case-Control Study

Efficacy of Nissen Sleeve Gastrectomy on Mid-term Barrett's Esophagus Regression

Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Worsen Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Obese Patients? A Prospective Study

Bariatric Surgery Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States: An Analysis of the Nationwide Readmissions Database

Early experience with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as a single-stage bariatric procedure

Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in Denmark from 2010 to 2016: a nationwide cohort study

Investigation of the Relationship Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using 24-hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance With pH Testing According to Current Consensus

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy for obesity: can it be considered a definitive procedure?

Incidence of Post-operative Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disorder in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Possible route of antigen uptake by the Harderian gland of the domestic fowl.

Harmonic oscillator driven by a quantum current.