Does Doppler myocardial imaging give new insights or simply old information revisited?

G. Sutherland,A. Lange,P. Palka,N. Grubb,A. Fleming,W. Mcdicken

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.76.3.197

IF: 5.7

1996-09-01

Heart

Abstract:Current standard cardiac ultrasound techniques derive their information on myocardial function indirectly either from variables measured from grey scale endocardial and epicardial specular reflections or from blood pool Doppler indices. Doppler myocardial imaging (DMI) is a new cardiac ultrasound imaging technique in which the Doppler principle has been applied to measure a number of indices of myocardial function.1-' This technique is based on colour Doppler principles and has the potential to quantify regional intramural velocities by detecting consecutive phase-shifts of the ultrasound echoes from contracting myocardium. There are several advantages of this technique over standard grey scale M mode and cross sectional imaging. The velocity of motion at a large number of neighbouring intramyocardial sites can be determined and distinguished very rapidly. The Doppler technique measures frequency shift rather than signal amplitude, and the image information is not greatly affected by tissue attenuation. Thus it is possible to obtain diagnostic quality DMI images from patients who would be considered poorly echogenic as a result of chest wall attenuation effects on standard grey scale imaging.4 The technology changes involved in obtaining DMI velocity images are described by Erbel et al an accompanying editorial on page 193. From mean velocity information, regional myocardial accelerations can be calculated and displayed in a two-dimensional format. In addition, reflected Doppler energy can be measured. This variable directly measures tissue backscatter intensity and is derived by determining the power of the reflected Doppler signal. Doppler energy information is both velocity and angle independent. In terms of blood pool imaging, it has been shown to be directly equivalent to integrated backscatter data.5 In vitro phantom studies have confirmed the accuracy of DMI velocity encoding over the range of velocities at which normal and abnormal myocardium moves.6 Velocity estimation has been shown to be affected by target velocity, target material, system receive gain, and the pulse train size, but the inherent error is at worst ± 10% of the true mean velocity.6 The spatial resolution of both the two-dimensional velocity and energy maps is at best 1 x 1 mm.2