Repair of partially defective restorations: Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient acceptance

Clemens Lechte,Frederike Schlarmann,Jana Biermann,Annette Wiegand,Philipp Kanzow
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105361
Abstract:Objectives: This systematic review attempted to assess patient acceptance of repairs instead of complete replacement for partially defective restorations and to identify factors affecting patients' decision-making for or against repairs. Study selection: Observational and qualitative studies reporting on (1) the proportion of patients accepting or preferring repairs, (2) the proportion of dentists / dental students / dental schools stating that their patients accept or prefer repairs, (3) factors affecting patients' decision-making for or against repairs. Sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE via Ovid, and Web of Science) were last searched in August 2024 (PROSPERO database: CRD42023449437). Data: Twenty-one sources reporting on 20 survey studies addressing individual dentists / dental students and dental schools were included. None of the included studies directly addressed patients (e.g., by interviewing patients). Of the surveyed dentists and dental students, 86.3 % (95 %-CI: 77.8-91.8 %) reported that their patients accept or prefer repairs. Dental schools rated patient acceptance as high as 93.0 % (95 %-CI: 82.3-97.4 %). None of the included studies reported factors affecting patients' decision-making for or against repairs. Conclusions: Repairs of partially defective restorations instead of complete replacement seem to be associated with a high level of patient acceptance as most dentists, dental students, and dental schools stated that their patients accept or even prefer repairs instead of complete replacement. Clinical significance: Within the shared decision-making process, dentists can expect their patients to accept or even prefer repairs instead of complete replacement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?