Platelet-to-neutrophil ratio predicts hemorrhagic transformation and unfavorable outcomes in acute ischemic stroke with intravenous thrombolysis

Ausanee Chaiwisitkun,Sombat Muengtaweepongsa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v14.i3.95540
2024-09-20
Abstract:Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) retains a notable stance in global disease burden, with thrombolysis via recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) serving as a viable management approach, albeit with variable outcomes and the potential for complications like hemorrhagic transformation (HT). The platelet-to-neutrophil ratio (P/NR) has been considered for its potential prognostic value in AIS, yet its capacity to predict outcomes following rtPA administration demands further exploration. Aim: To elucidate the prognostic utility of P/NR in predicting HT and clinical outcomes following intravenous rtPA administration in AIS patients. Methods: Data from 418 AIS patients treated with intravenous rtPA at Thammasat University Hospital from January 2018 to June 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The relationship between P/NR and clinical outcomes [early neurological deterioration (E-ND), HT, delayed ND (D-ND), and 3-mo outcomes] was scrutinized. Results: Notable variables, such as age, diabetes, and stroke history, exhibited statistical disparities when comparing patients with and without E-ND, HT, D-ND, and 3-mo outcomes. P/NR prognostication revealed an optimal cutoff of 43.4 with a 60.3% sensitivity and a 52.5% specificity for 90-d outcomes. P/NR prognostic accuracy was statistically significant for 90-d outcomes [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.562], D-ND (AUC = 0.584), and HT (AUC = 0.607). Conclusion: P/NR demonstrated an association with adverse 3-mo clinical outcomes, HT, and D-ND in AIS patients post-rtPA administration, indicating its potential as a predictive tool for complications and prognoses. This infers that a diminished P/NR may serve as a novel prognostic indicator, assisting clinicians in identifying AIS patients at elevated risk for unfavorable outcomes following rtPA therapy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?