High-grade Vesicoureteral Reflux in Patients With Anorectal Malformation From the ARM-Net Registry: Is Our Screening Sufficient?
H.J.J. van der Steeg,J.C.H.B.M. Luijten,F. Fascetti-Leon,M. Miserez,I. Samuk,P. Stenström,L.L. de Wall,I. de BlaauwI,I.A.L.M. van Rooij,the ARM-Net Consortium,Eva Amerstorfer,Holger Till,Dalia Aminoff,Piero Bagolan,Barbara Iacobelli,Paul Broens,Yusuf Çavuşoğlu,Stefan Deluggi,Emre Divarci,María Fanjul,Araceli García Vázquez,Carlos Giné,Stefano Giuliani,Ramon R. Gorter,Jan Gosemann,Martin Lacher,Caterina Grano,Sabine Grasshoff-Derr,Michel Haanen,Stefan Holland-Cunz,Ekkehart Jenetzky,Wilfried Krois,Ernesto Leva,Anna Morandi,Judith Lindert,Gabriele Lisi,Johanna Ludwiczek,Igor Makedonsky,Carlo Marcelis,Chris Verhaak,Paola Midrio,Mazeena Mohideen,Alessio Pini Prato,Lucie Poš,Richard Škába,Carlos Reck-Burneo,Heiko Reutter,Stephan Rohleder,Nagoud Schukfeh,Eberhard Schmiedeke,Nicole Schwarzer,Cornelius Sloots,Alejandra Vilanova-Sánchez,Patrick Volk,Marieke Witvliet,I. de Blaauw
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.01.008
IF: 2.549
2024-01-01
Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is a common associated urological anomaly in anorectal malformation (ARM)-patients. High-grade VUR requires antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI's), renal scarring and -failure. The exact prevalence of high-grade VUR in ARM patients is unknown. Hence, the aim of this study was determining the incidence of high-grade VUR in ARM-patients, and its associated risk factors.METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed using the ARM-Net registry, including data from 34 centers. Patient characteristics, screening for and presence of renal anomalies and VUR, sacral and spinal anomalies, and sacral ratio were registered. Phenotypes of ARM were grouped according to their complexity in complex and less complex. Multivariable analyses were performed to detect independent risk factors for high-grade (grade III-V) VUR.RESULTS: This study included 2502 patients (50 % female). Renal screening was performed in 2250 patients (90 %), of whom 648 (29 %) had a renal anomaly documented. VUR-screening was performed in 789 patients (32 %), establishing high-grade VUR in 150 (19 %). In patients with a normal renal screening, high-grade VUR was still present in 10 % of patients. Independent risk factors for presence of high-grade VUR were a complex ARM (OR 2.6, 95 %CI 1.6-4.3), and any renal anomaly (OR 3.3, 95 %CI 2.1-5.3).CONCLUSIONS: Although renal screening is performed in the vast majority of patients, only 32 % underwent VUR-screening. Complex ARM and any renal anomaly were independent risk factors for high-grade VUR. Remarkably, 10 % had high-grade VUR despite normal renal screening. Therefore, VUR-screening seems indicated in all ARM patients regardless of renal screening results, to prevent sequelae such as UTI's, renal scarring and ultimately renal failure.TYPE OF STUDY: Observational Cohort-Study.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
pediatrics,surgery