Comparison of Effectiveness among Five Screening Tests for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
侯瑞芳,汤正义,张炜,凌丹芸,吴景程,张连珍,毛羽丰,王卫庆,李小美,宁光
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1006-6187.2008.02.008
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective Five simple screening tests, including Toronto clinical scoring system(TCSS), Michigan neuropathy screening instrument(MNSI), Diabetic neuropathy symptom score(DNS) , vibration testing by a 128-Hz tuning fork,and 10g semmes-weinstein monofilament examination(SWME), were analyzed in T2DM to evaluate the effectiveness for diabetic peripheral neuropathy(DPN). Methods 419 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus underwent the measurements of DPN with TCSS,MNSI,DNS,128-Hz tuning fork and 10g-SWME. DPN was diagnosed by neurological examination,motor and sensory nerve conduction velocity,vibration perception threshold,and warm and cold thermal perception threshold. The effectiveness of the five tests was assessed by using ROC curve analysis. Results There were significant differences in age,duration of diabetes , duration of symptoms for diabetic neuropathy between two groups(all P value <0.001).All five screening tests were significantly associated with NCV,warm and cold thermal perception threshold and vibration perception threshold(all P value <0.001).TCSS showed the best correlation with NCV and thermal perception threshold. Area under the ROC curve values for TCSS,MNSI,DNS,tuning fork and 10g-SWME test were 0.855,0.679,0.669,0.716,0.599,respectively.The optimal cut-points of them provided sensitivity of 79.9%,51.1%,62.3%,43.7%,20.5%, and specificity of 77.5%,79.5%,67.5%,99.3%,99.3%, respectively. Conclusions For screening DPN, simple tool tests are not always reliable and the results from general clinical examination may be a good way.