Abstract:Governments, international organisations, corporations, and other institutions around the globe are drawing up frameworks for ‘trustworthy’ Artificial Intelligence (AI). This effort follows an explicit strategic premise: raise the trustworthiness of AI and people will trust it more, thus use it more, and unlock the technology’s economic and social potential. With its proposed AI Act, the European Union (EU) has put itself at the forefront of this regulatory development. Adopting a risk-based approach towards AI, the EU chose to understand trustworthiness of AI in terms of the acceptability of its risks. This conflation of trustworthiness with acceptability of risk invites further reflection. Based on a narrative systematic literature review on institutional trust and the use of AI in the public sector, this paper argues that the EU adopted a simplistic conceptualisation of trust and is overselling its regulatory ambition. The AI Act is a proposal for technocratic risk-regulation which by itself is unlikely to effectively signal trustworthiness or raise actual levels of trust in citizens. This paper makes four contributions. First, it reconstructs the conflation of ‘trustworthiness’ with the ‘acceptability of risks’ in the EU’s AI policy. Second, with a view on the extreme heterogeneity of trust research, the paper develops a prescriptive set of variables for reviewing trust research in the context of AI. Third, it then uses those variables as a structure for a narrative review of prior research on trust and trustworthiness in AI in the public sector. Fourth, the paper relates the findings of the review to the EU’s AI policy. It states the uncertain prospects for the AI Act to be successful in engineering citizen’s trust. There remains a threat of misalignment between levels of actual trust and the trustworthiness of applied AI. The conflation of ‘trustworthiness’ with the ‘acceptability of risks’ in the AI Act will thus be shown to be inadequate.

Trustworthiness of voting advice applications in Europe

Enhancing the design of voting advice applications with BERT language model

Exploring the Social Media Impact of Voting Advice Apps: A Case Study on the Representation of the Wahl-O-Mat on Twitter

Fast and Adaptive Questionnaires for Voting Advice Applications

Functional trustworthiness of AI systems by statistically valid testing

‘Hi Chatbot, let’s Talk about Politics!’ Examining the Impact of Verbal Anthropomorphism in Conversational Agent Voting Advice Applications (CAVAAs) on Higher and Lower Politically Sophisticated Users

Investigating LLMs as Voting Assistants via Contextual Augmentation: A Case Study on the European Parliament Elections 2024

Trust assumptions in voting systems

Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk

In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence

Zombies in the Loop? Humans Trust Untrustworthy AI-Advisors for Ethical Decisions

Generative AI Voting: Fair Collective Choice is Resilient to LLM Biases and Inconsistencies

Who’s in charge here? A survey on Trustworthy AI in Variable Autonomy Robotic Systems

Trust, trustworthiness and AI governance

Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence and the European Union AI Act: On the Conflation of Trustworthiness and the Acceptability of Risk

In AI We Trust? Factors That Influence Trustworthiness of AI-infused Decision-Making Processes

Establishing and Evaluating Trustworthy AI: Overview and Research Challenges

Assessing Political Bias in Large Language Models

Trustworthiness Assurance Assessment for High-Risk AI-Based Systems

Lessons Learned in Performing a Trustworthy AI and Fundamental Rights Assessment

Artificial Intelligence across Europe: A Study on Awareness, Attitude and Trust