Microvascular effects of a mixed meal tolerance test: a model validation study

Sebastiaan J W van Kraaij,Boukje C Eveleens Maarse,Femke P M Hoevenaars,Ines Warnke,Marieke L de Kam,Matthijs Moerland,Pim Gal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cpf.12904

2024-09-23

Abstract:Purpose: Endothelial dysfunction is a pathophysiological change preceding many cardiovascular events. Measuring improvements of endothelial function is challenging when function is already optimal, which may be remediated using a physiological challenge. This study aimed to determine whether imaging assessments can detect microvascular effects of a mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT). Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers (age ≥45 and ≤70 years) underwent two MMTTs at the beginning (Day 1) and end (Day 84) of a twelve-week period. Imaging methods included laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) combined with post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia (PORH) and local thermal hyperaemia (LTH) challenges, passive leg movement ultrasonography (PLM), and sidestream dark field microscopy (SDFM). Measurements were conducted pre-MMTT and at 5 timepoints post-MMTT for PLM and SDFM and 3 timepoints post-MMTT for PORH and LTH. Results: No consistent effects of the MMTT were detected on LSCI LTH, PLM and SDFM endpoints. LSCI PORH maximum perfusion was significantly suppressed 46, 136, and 300 min post-MMTT administration on Day 1, while residual perfusion decreased significantly 46 and 136 min post-MMTT on Day 1. However, when repeated on Day 84, PORH endpoints were not significantly affected by the MMTT. Conclusion: SDFM, PLM and LSCI LTH endpoints displayed high intra-subject variability and did not detect consistent effects of MMTT. LSCI PORH endpoints displayed the lowest intra-subject variability of all assessed endpoints and were affected by the MMTT on Day 1, but not on Day 84. Further standardization of methods or more robust challenges to affect vascular endpoints may be needed.