Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the factor XIa-inhibiting antibody osocimab in healthy male East Asian volunteers: Results from two phase 1 studies

Zhili Dong,Kensei Hashizume,Frauke Friedrichs,Pei Liu,Toshiaki Tanaka,Yuqin Liao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.70012
Abstract:The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and safety of osocimab single doses in healthy Chinese and Japanese volunteers over 149 days were evaluated. Two phase 1 single-blinded, placebo-controlled studies with 27 Japanese and 50 Chinese participants were conducted. Osocimab was investigated with IV doses of 0.3, 1.25, and 2.5 mg/kg (Chinese study) and 0.3, 1.25, and 5.0 mg/kg (Japanese study), as well as SC doses of 3.0 and 6.0 mg/kg (Chinese study) and 6.0 mg/kg (Japanese study). The maximum plasma concentration was reached 1-3 h and 4-6 days after IV and SC administration, respectively. Osocimab exhibited a deviation from dose-proportional pharmacokinetics for AUC but not Cmax; higher doses had higher apparent clearance and disproportionately lower total exposure. A slightly lower exposure was observed in Japanese compared with Chinese volunteers after IV administration; conversely, relatively higher exposure in Japanese volunteers with SC dosing was identified. Osocimab was associated with a dose-dependent increase in activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Maximal aPTT prolongations were observed 1-4 h and 2-6 days after IV and SC administration, respectively. Anti-drug antibodies of low titer were detected in 1/9 (11.1%) Japanese volunteers administered placebo and 26/40 (65.0%) Chinese volunteers administered osocimab. Adverse events were reported in 8/18 (44.4%) Japanese and 28/40 (70.0%) Chinese volunteers who received osocimab, as well as in 1/9 (11.1%) Japanese and 6/10 (60.0%) Chinese volunteers who received placebo. In conclusion, data did not suggest a clear dose-proportionality for osocimab within the investigated dose range. The effect of osocimab on aPTT was expected per its mechanism of action. Osocimab was generally well tolerated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?