Abstract:Abstract BACKGROUND Effectiveness and safety of Dual biologic therapy (DBT) or in combination with small molecules for treatment of refractory cases of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) has been studied previously. In this systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA), our aim was to update prior SRMA by Alayo et al including newer studies and randomized clinical trials Explorer and VEGA and newer endpoints including corticosteroid free remission rates, need for surgeries, and effectiveness based on IBD subtype. METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search using Clinical trials.gov, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Medline, PubMed Medline, Scopus and Web of Science, identifying additional relevant studies published until January 19, 2023. Random-effects inverse variance model was used to combine the proportions of patients who achieved response/remission or developed AEs to obtain pooled estimates (primary outcomes). RESULTS A total of 1184 citations were identified through the database searches, of which 360 duplicates and 755 unsuitable studies were excluded following title/abstract screening. Then, the full-texts of the remaining 69 articles were retrieved for further investigation. Of these, 59 were excluded, leaving 10 additional eligible studies since the prior systematic review. A total of 23 studies met the inclusion criteria including 13 in prior SRMA, published between 2007 and 2023. Final analysis included 531 patients who underwent 543 therapeutic trials (TTs) of 8 different combination therapies. Of these 264 (49.7%) were men men. Among combination therapies, Ustekinumab (UST) + anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist (aTNF) had the highest pooled clinical response (81.6% [95% CI: 66.2-97.0], I2=52%, p=0.04; 9 studies, 44 TTs) and remission (Figure 1) (64.2% [95% CI: 45.2-83.1], I2=55%, p=0.03; 8 studies, 42 TTs) rates. In patients with CD, the highest pooled clinical response and remission rates pertained to UST + aTNF (91.6% [95% CI: 79.8-100.0], I2 = 19%, p=0.28; 8 studies, 29 TTs). In patients with UC, the highest pooled clinical response rate was seen with Vedolizumab (VDZ)+UST (100.0% [95% CI: 70.0-100.0], I2 = 0%, p=1.00; 4 studies, 4 TTs) and UST + aTNF (100.0% [95% CI: 73.2-100.0], I2 = 0%, p =1.00; 4 studies, 5 TTs). and while the highest pooled clinical remission rate was with VDZ + UST (75.0% [95% CI: 26.0-100.0], I2 = 63%, p=0.05; 4 studies, 4 TTs). The lowest pooled AEs rate (Figure 2) related to tofacitinib (Tofa) + VDZ (12.5% [95% CI: 2.9-22.0], I2 = 41%, p = 0.10; 8 studies, 76 TTs), followed by UST + aTNF (12.7% [95% CI: 0.0-25.8], I2=43%, p = 0.08; 9 studies, 43 TTs) and Tofa+aTNF (13.0% [95% CI: 0.8-25.3], I2=49%, p=0.08; 6 studies, 27 TTs) in patients with IBD. CONCLUSION Combining biologics or with small molecules in treatment of refractory IBD is promising and appeared to be generally safe with no major side effects. Figure 1 Clinical remission Figure 2 Adverse events

Effectiveness, safety, and cost of combination advanced therapies in inflammatory bowel disease

P647 Effectiveness of combined treatment with two biologics or advanced molecules in inflammatory bowel disease

Anti-cytokine Therapy and Small Molecule Agents for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Combining Biologics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Other Immune Mediated Inflammatory Disorders

Promises and Dangers of Combination Therapy

Anti‐TNF and Immunosuppressive Combination Therapy is Preferential to Inducing Clinical Remission in Patients with Active Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta‐analysis

P746 Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Advanced Combination Therapy in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multi-center Brazilian Study

Combination treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: Present status and future perspectives

The Efficacy and Safety of Biological and Immunosuppressive Combination Therapy Are Equal to Biological Monotherapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

A practical guide to combination advanced therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

Efficacy and Safety of Advanced Therapies for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis at Induction and Maintenance: An Indirect Treatment Comparison Using Bayesian Network Meta-analysis

The 2023 Impact of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Canada: Treatment Landscape

P1038 Does combination immunomodulator therapy impact real-world biologic effectiveness in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases?A propensity score analysis in patients treated with anti-TNF and non-anti-TNF biologics in the UK IBD BioResource

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS: SAFETY AND EFFICTIVENESS OF COMBINING BIOLOGICS AND SMALL MOLECULES IN INFLMAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE

S1192 Exploring Dual-Targeted Therapy in the Management of Moderate to Severe Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study

P1043 Immunomodulator and advanced therapies for prevention of clinical relapse and loss of response during maintenance phase in Crohn’s disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

P556 Immunomodulator and advanced therapies for Induction of clinical remission and response in Crohn’s disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

P1036 Persistence of biologics and advanced small molecules in 4th, 5th and 6th line of therapy for inflammatory bowel disease: a cross-sectional retrospective study

Real-World Outcomes of Dual Advanced Therapy in Children and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Analysis of Safety, Medical Resource Utilization, and Treatment Costs by Drug Class for Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the United States Based on Insurance Claims Data

No Impact of Concomitant Medications on Efficacy and Safety of Biologics and Small Molecules for Ulcerative Colitis