Investigating the coverage of the Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database for examining health disparities related to persistent poverty areas in colorectal cancer patients

Chenghui Li,Cheng Peng,Peter DelNero,Jonathan Laryea,Daniela Ramirez Aguilar,Güneş Koru,Yong-Moon Mark Park,Mahima Saini,Mario Schootman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01918-9
2024-09-22
Abstract:Purpose: We aimed to (1) determine the extent of coverage of colorectal cancer patients in Arkansas All-Payer Claims Database (APCD), (2) assess coverage difference between persistent poverty and other areas, and (3) identify patient, tumor, and area factors associated with inclusion in APCD. Methods: Data were from 2018 to 2020 Arkansas APCD linked with 2019 Arkansas Central Cancer Registry (ACCR). We constructed four cohorts to assess APCD's coverage of CRC patients: (Cohort 1) ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in APCD in 2019; (Cohort 2) APCD coverage in the diagnosis month; continuous APCD coverage in the 30; Year around diagnosis (six months before to five months after diagnosis month) (Cohort 3); or until death within six months (Cohort 4). We compared proportions in the cohorts by area persistent poverty designation. Logistic regressions identified factors associated with inclusion in APCD cohorts. Patient selection: CRC patients diagnosed in 2019 from ACCR, excluding in situ disease. Results: Of the 1,510 CRC patients diagnosed in 2019, 83% had ≥ 1 day of medical coverage in 2019 APCD (Cohort1), 81% had coverage in the diagnosis month (Cohort 2), and 63% had continuous coverage in the year around diagnosis (Cohort 3). Additionally, 11% died within six months but had continuous coverage until death (Cohort 4, 74%). No coverage difference was found between persist poverty and other areas. Age and primary payer type at diagnosis were the main predictors of inclusion in APCD. Conclusion: Arkansas APCD had high coverage of Arkansas CRC patients. No selection bias by area of persistent poverty designation was present.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?