Abstract:Background: An important task in obstetrics is to offer patients adequate pain management after vaginal delivery (VD) and after cesarean section (CS). The aim of the present analysis was to assess pain intensity at the day after childbirth, after 3 and 6 months in women after VD and after CS. Additionally, it was planned to identify determinants of maternal satisfaction with acute pain therapy following VD and CS. Methods: This secondary analysis of a single-center prospective cohort study included 210 parturients. The women gave birth in the University Hospital of Wuerzburg. They completed a survey before childbirth (P), on the first day (D1), 3 and 6 months after VD and CS. The survey included questions about the expected pain, the experienced pain, the birth, the pain afterwards and also psychological questionnaires. In addition, information was collected from the patient records. Women with planned CS received spinal anesthesia. A secondary CS was performed with an epidural, spinal or general anesthesia. Pain therapy on the ward was standardized. The primary outcomes were acute and chronic pain intensity at rest, during movement, determinants of satisfaction with pain therapy and the wish to have received more pain medication during and after VD and CS (D1). Results: A total of 175 women completed the survey at all time points and were available for the analysis (drop-out 16.8%). The results confirmed high pain levels at D1 after CS (median pain intensity during movement: 8 NRS points, interquartile range, IQR 6-9 points). After VD pain scores were much lower (median pain intensity during movement: 4 points, IQR 2-5 points). Of the mothers 7.4% reported pain at rest at all time points after VD or CS but pain intensity was low after 3 and 6 months (median pain intensity at rest: 2 points, IQR 0-3 points), 28% received extended-release opioids after CS and 33% of women (VD and CS) had an epidural. The most important influencing factor for lower satisfaction with pain therapy after CS or VD was inadequate pain relief. Women with VD who had an epidural, were more satisfied during delivery than women without but there was no difference at D1. Discussion: This study confirmed high acute pain levels following CS and an incidence of chronic pain of around 7% but pain intensity was low and one third received strong opioids after CS. Around 11% of women after primary CS (8% epidural, 3% combined spinal/epidural) and around 55% of women after secondary CS had an epidural, which could be used for pain therapy after birth. Women without an epidural or without opioids may not have had good pain management. The received pain relief appeared to be the most relevant predictor for satisfaction and the wish to have received more pain medication. Mothers having a VD with an epidural catheter were more satisfied with pain therapy during birth than those without. Therefore, a better multimodal pain management (including opioids, epidural and nonopioids) might provide better pain relief and might improve overall satisfaction with pain treatment following CS. Finally, the received pain relief might be a better patient-related outcome measure for satisfaction with pain treatment after childbirth than pain intensity alone.

National survey on clinical practice in obstetric analgesia in Spain

Quality of analgesic care in labor: A cross‐sectional study of the first national register‐based benchmarking system

Survey on the practice of anaesthesiologists in inguinal hernia surgery in Galicia

Complementary techniques of relaxation and non-pharmacological analgesia during childbirth: systematic review

A survey of perceptions with pain management in Spanish inpatients

[Epidural analgesia for painless delivery. Our experience]

Mixed-methods systematic review: Childbearing women's views, experiences, and decision-making related to epidural analgesia in labour

Good practices in perinatal bereavement care in public maternity hospitals in Southern Spain

Analysis of Maternal Positions during the Dilation and Expulsive Phase and Their Relationship with Perineal Injuries in Eutocic Deliveries Attended by Midwives

Variability of clinical practice in the care of the second stage of labor among midwives in Spain

Comparison between different epidural analgesia modalities for labor

Establishment of Labor Epidural Analgesia Service and its Assessment: An Experience in a Hospital of a Middle-Income Country

Insights into obstetric anesthesia practices: a quantitative survey among physicians across Arab countries

Serum Levels of Nitric Oxide Metabolites During Labour with or Without Combined Spinal-Epidural Analgesia.

Effects of Water Immersion Versus Epidural as Analgesic Methods during Labor among Low-Risk Women: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

Standardising antenatal analgesia information

Influences, Practices, Barriers, and Challenges

Predictors of a positive birth experience in childbirth: A cross-sectional study

Global cross-sectional survey on neonatal pharmacologic sedation and analgesia practices and pain assessment tools: impact of the sociodemographic index (SDI)

Epidural analgesia in primigravidae in spontaneous labour at term: a prospective study

Determinants of satisfaction with acute pain therapy during and after childbirth