A facile and efficient method of enzyme immobilization on silica particles via Michael acceptor film coatings: immobilized catalase in a plug flow reactor

G. Bayramoglu,M. Arica,Aysenur Genc,V. Ozalp,A. Ince,N. Bıçak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-016-1566-0

2016-02-15

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Long-term reduced functional capacity and quality of life in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Anderson Donelli da Silveira,Fernando Luis Scolari,Marina Petersen Saadi,Darshan H. Brahmbhatt,Mauricio Milani,Juliana Goulart Prata Oliveira Milani,Gerson Cipriano Junior,Ivaine Tais Sauthier Sartor,Gabriela Oliveira Zavaglia,Maiko Luis Tonini,Marcela Santos Correa da Costa,Marcelo Comerlato Scotta,Renato T. Stein,Regis Goulart Rosa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1289454

IF: 3.9

2024-03-06

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Background Persistent symptoms and exercise intolerance have been reported after COVID-19, even months after the acute disease. Although, the long-term impact on exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is still unclear. Research question To assess the long-term functional capacity and HRQoL in patients hospitalized due to COVID-19. Study design and methods This is a prospective cohort study, conducted at two centers in Brazil, that included post-discharge COVID-19 patients and paired controls. The cohort was paired by age, sex, body mass index and comorbidities, using propensity score matching in a 1:3 ratio. Patients were eligible if signs or symptoms suggestive of COVID-19 and pulmonary involvement on chest computed tomography. All patients underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and a HRQoL questionnaire (SF-36) 6 months after the COVID-19. The main outcome was the percentage of predicted peak oxygen consumption (ppVO2). Secondary outcomes included other CPET measures and HRQoL. Results The study sample comprised 47 post-discharge COVID-19 patients and 141 healthy controls. The mean age of COVID-19 patients was 54 ± 14 years, with 19 (40%) females, and a mean body mass index of 31 kg/m 2 (SD, 6). The median follow-up was 7 months (IQR, 6.5–8.0) after hospital discharge. PpVO2 in COVID-19 patients was lower than in controls (83% vs. 95%, p = 0.002) with an effect size of 0.38 ([95%CI], 0.04–0.70). Mean peak VO2 (22 vs. 25 mL/kg/min, p = 0.04) and OUES (2,122 vs. 2,380, p = 0.027) were also reduced in the COVID-19 patients in comparison to controls. Dysfunctional breathing (DB) was present in 51%. HRQoL was significantly reduced in post COVID patients and positively correlated to peak exercise capacity. Interpretation Hospitalized COVID-19 patients presented, 7 months after discharge, with a reduction in functional capacity and HRQoL when compared to historical controls. HRQoL were reduced and correlated with the reduced peak VO2 in our population.

medicine, general & internal
Cognitive and Functional Capacity Assessment of Individuals Who Were Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit Due to COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study

Juliana Cristina Fogaça Carneiro,Mayco Biasibetti,Folly Rodrigues,Gustavo de Castro Barroso,Fernanda Cechetti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241291513

2024-10-31

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract:Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, Ahead of Print. AimThe goal of this study was to identify changes in cognitive and functional capacity after hospital discharge in those infected with COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU.MethodsThis is a prospective cohort study carried out with individuals who were admitted to a hospital, from July 2021 to May 2022. The evaluations happened in three moments: at hospital discharge, 30 days after discharge and 90 days after discharge. The instruments applied are the following: handgrip dynamometer, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic questionnaire (MoCA-B), Barthel Index (BI), timed up and go test (TUG), hospital anxiety and depressive scale (HADS) and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionary (SF-36).Results74 individuals were eligible to participate in the study, 25 of which were followed for 90 days. Based on the results of the MoCA-b, there were no relevant cognitive changes after 3 months. According to the Barthel Index applied to each of the evaluations, the percentage of subjects that were classified as independent or minimally dependent was 48%, 92% then 96%, respectively, demonstrating that individuals can achieve a good degree of functional independence after 3 months. Despite that, the SF-36 demonstrated a score below the South Brazilian normal in some domains.ConclusionThe individuals studied did not present persistent cognitive changes after 3 months and functional capacity showed significant improvement during this period. However, when the assessment is about the self-perceived quality of life, the majority of domain values are still below expectations, deserving attention by the health professionals involved.

critical care medicine
Clinical and functional status of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: an observational study at 2-3 months following discharge

Inmaculada Castillo Sánchez,Julia Tárrega Camarasa,Enric Barbeta Sánchez,Vinicius Rosa Oliveira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2023.1248869

2023-08-21

Abstract:Introduction: Critically ill COVID-19 patients present long-term sequelae that affect their everyday life. This study aimed to describe the clinical and functional status of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia at 2-3 months post discharge from a Spanish critical care unit. Methods: We collected retrospective data from 58 patients admitted to the critical care unit with diagnosis of severe respiratory failure due to COVID-19. Only patients who required invasive (IMV) or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) during their hospital stay were included. The following data were collected 2-3 months after hospital discharge: respiratory signs and symptoms, lung ultrasound (LUS) and diaphragm ultrasound images, blood test analysis, lung function parameters (spirometry and DLCO), exercise capacity (6 min walk test and sit-to-stand test), level of physical activity and health-related quality of life. Results: We found clinical symptoms and lung structural alterations in LUS images of 26 patients (48.1%). Those presenting LUS abnormalities had longer length of stay in hospital (p = 0.026), functional alterations in spirometry (p < 0.01) and decreased diaphragm excursion (p = 0.029). No significant alterations were observed in blood test analysis, exercise capacity, level of physical activity and health-related quality of life. Conclusions: A significant part of the patients admitted to a critical care unit continue to present clinical symptoms, pulmonary morphological abnormalities, and lung function alterations 2-3 months post discharge. This study corroborates that assessing the functional status of the survivors is essential to monitor the evolution of pulmonary sequelae.
Barium versus nonbarium stimuli: differences in taste intensity, chemesthesis, and swallowing behavior in healthy adult women.

Ahmed Nagy,C. Steele,Cathy A. Pelletier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_JSLHR-S-13-0136

2014-06-01

Abstract:PURPOSE The authors examined the impact of barium on the perceived taste intensity of 7 different liquid tastant stimuli and the modulatory effect that these differences in perceived taste intensity have on swallowing behaviors. METHOD Participants were 80 healthy women, stratified by age group (<40; >60) and genetic taste status (supertasters; nontasters). Perceived taste intensity and chemesthetic properties (fizziness; burning-stinging) were rated for 7 tastant solutions (each prepared with and without barium) using the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. Tongue-palate pressures and submental surface electromyography (sEMG) were simultaneously measured during swallowing of these same randomized liquids. Path analysis differentiated the effects of stimulus, genetic taste status, age, barium condition, taste intensity, and an effortful saliva swallow strength covariate on swallowing. RESULTS Barium stimuli were rated as having reduced taste intensity compared with nonbarium stimuli. Barium also dampened fizziness but did not influence burning-stinging sensation. The amplitudes of tongue-palate pressure or submental sEMG did not differ when swallowing barium versus nonbarium stimuli. CONCLUSIONS Despite impacting taste intensity, the addition of barium to liquid stimuli does not appear to alter behavioral parameters of swallowing. Barium solutions can be considered to elicit behaviors that are similar to those used with nonbarium liquids outside the assessment situation.
Surviving critical COVID-19: How functionality, physical, mental and cognitive outcomes evolve?

Ana Teixeira-Vaz,José Afonso Rocha,Mafalda Oliveira,Tiago Simões-Moreira,David Almeida e Reis,Ana Isabel Silva,José Artur Paiva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284597

IF: 3.7

2023-06-23

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Purpose To analyze the long-term consequences of critical COVID-19, regarding physical, mental, cognitive and functional impairments, and to describe its evolution through time. Methods Prospective cohort study, with consecutive inclusion of patients admitted due to SARS-CoV-2 to intensive care units(ICU) of a tertiary-care center, between May/2020 and September/2021. All included patients were included in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine(PRM) inpatient programs during ICU stay. Eligible patients were evaluated on PRM appointments 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge. In each visit, physical examination and a predefined set of scales were applied, aiming to comprehensively evaluate the three domains (physical, mental and cognitive) of post-intensive care syndrome and the patients’ functionality. Statistical analysis encompassed descriptive and univariate analysis. Results A total of 42 patients were included: 66.7% males, mean age of 62 yo. In the physical domain, 6 months after ICU discharge, there was a significant reduction in quality of life (p-value = 0.034), muscle strength (p-value = 0.002), gait ability (p-value<0.001) and balance (p-values<0.001) and increased fatigue levels (p-value = 0.009), in comparison with reference values. Yet, a significative positive evolution was observed in all referred subdomains (p-values<0.05). Nevertheless, 12 months after discharge, muscle strength (p-value = 0.001), gait (p-value<0.001) and balance (p-value<0.001) were still significantly compromised. Regarding the mental domain, both at 6 and 12 months after discharge, the levels of anxiety and depression were significantly increased (p-values<0.001). Nonetheless, a positive evolution was also found (p-values<0.02). Cognitive performance was significantly impaired in comparison with reference values, both at 6 and 12 months (p-value<0.001). Yet, a global improvement was also depicted (p-value = 0.003). Six months after ICU discharge, 54.8% were autonomous in activities of daily living, a value that improved to 74.0% in the subsequent 6 months (p-value = 0.002). Conclusion Critical COVID-19 survivors present significant physical, mental and cognitive impairments 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge, despite their positive evolution through time.

multidisciplinary sciences
Impact of Functional Limitation on Quality of Life among Covid-19 Survivors

Dr. Gloria Naik -,Dr. Priya S -,Dr. Archana Methe -,Dr. Maithili Patil -,Dr. Panna Shete -

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.25014

2024-07-21

International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research

Abstract:Background: It has been evident that after viral infections (e.g., SARS-1), patients often sustain functional limitations over a long period after discharge from the hospital. Persisting symptoms with subsequent progression to poor functional status have been reported in a substantial proportion of these patients. These patients are susceptible to developing reduced functional status that impact their ability to care for themselves and to perform usual activities of daily living in the months following hospital admission. Previous severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreaks showed to affect the survivors lung function, exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HrQoL), mental health, and lead to increased symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea from 6 months to 2 years after symptom onset. This study aims to assess those recovering from COVID-19 for symptoms of functional limitation and its impact on quality of life, thus identifying a group worthy of further study and early intervention. . Objective: To determine the impact of functional limitation on quality of life among COVID– 19 survivors Methods 87 patients exposed with covid-19 virus was followed up and assessed for functional limitation and quality of life. Participants were asked on a telephone to choose an appropriate option for each question in relation to current situation from the functional status scale and WHOQOL-BREF among COVID 19 survivors. Result: Karl Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the impact of functional limitation on quality of life among COVID19 survivors. Impact of functional limitation on four domains of quality of life was statistically significant at p<0.001. There was significantly strong negative correlation found between functional status scale and domain1 (r=-0.823) and functional status scale and domain 3 (r=-0.902) whereas there was significantly moderate negative correlation between functional status scale and domain 2 (r=0.584), functional status scale and domain 4 (r=-0.416). Conclusion: Present study concludes that there is a profound functional limitation after 6 months of post COVID. Hence the functional limitation and its associated symptoms need to be monitored and early intervention needs to be planned in post COVID19 patients.
Functionality, physical activity, fatigue and quality of life in patients with acute COVID-19 and Long COVID infection

Rodrigo Vélez-Santamaría,Jessica Fernández-Solana,Fátima Méndez-López,Marta Domínguez-García,Jerónimo J. González-Bernal,Rosa Magallón-Botaya,Bárbara Oliván-Blázquez,Josefa González-Santos,Mirian Santamaría-Peláez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47218-1

IF: 4.6

2023-11-14

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Abstract A prominent feature of COVID-19, both in the short and long term, is the reduction in quality of life (QoL) due to low functionality scores and the presence of fatigue, which can hinder daily activities. The main objective of this study is to compare the functional status, level of physical activity, fatigue, and QoL of patients with Long COVID to other COVID-19 patients who did not develop persistent illness, and to determine whether there is a relationship between these variables and QoL. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 170 participants who had been infected with COVID-19 or had developed Long COVID. The main variables studied were functionality, physical activity, QoL and fatigue, measured using the PostCOVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFS), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Short Form 12 (SF-12), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). The main findings show a significant relationship ( p < 0.001) between reduced functionality, lower physical activity levels, increased fatigue severity, and poorer QoL in Long COVID patients. Furthermore, these variables are also related to worse QoL, but only functional status predicts it. In conclusion, our results have shown highly significant correlations between the group with COVID-19 and Long COVID regarding functional status, level of physical activity, QoL, and fatigue.

multidisciplinary sciences
Effects of hospitalization on functional status and health-related quality of life of patients with COVID-19 complications: a literature review

Miriã Cândida Oliveira,Marilúcia M. Carrijo,João Pedro R. Afonso,Ricardo S. Moura,Luís Filipe R. J. Oliveira,Adriano L. Fonseca,Vinicio V. C. B. Melo,Maria Eduarda M. Lino,Beatriz N. Sousa,Elisângela R. P. Póvoa,Shayra K. A. Souza,Thays L. Guedes,Larissa R. Alves,Rodolfo P. Vieira,Luis V. F. Oliveira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17784/mtprehabjournal.2022.20.1239

2022-04-05

Abstract:Background: Due to the clinical situations faced, patients with COVID-19 who survive the intensive care unit (ICU) are at greater risk of developing post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), characterized by typical physical, psychological and cognitive consequences in the post hospital discharge. Given this situation, it is important to assess these patients for the presence of musculoskeletal and psychosocial changes, so that they are referred to an outpatient and/or home rehabilitation program. Objective: to identify in the scientific literature the effects of hospitalization on the functional status and health-related quality of life of patients with complications from COVID-19. Methods: Searches were performed for scientific articles indexed in the MEDLINE database (accessed by Pubmed), between the years 2019 to 2022. Articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria determined to compose this study were included. Results: from a total of 524 articles found in the literature, only 15 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The sample was represented by eight cross-sectional studies and seven cohort studies, and the main outcomes found to assess functional status were the six minute walking test the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status scale and for quality of life the EuroQol visual analogue scale and the Short form-36. Conclusion: With this literature review, it can be concluded that patients hospitalized for complications of COVID-19 showed a significant decline in functional status and health-related quality of life.However, updates are necessary to characterize the symptoms and persistent sequelae in the post-COVID-19.
Activity of Daily Living and Walking Ability of Patients with Severe COVID-19 at Discharge from an Acute Care Hospital

Hiroe Uehara,Risa Harada,Masato Ogawa,Kodai Komaki,Daisuke Makiura,Yasumitsu Fujii,Hirokazu Onishi,Tsuyoshi Matsumoto,Ryo Yoshikawa,Yoshitada Sakai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20240003

2024-01-23

Abstract:Objectives: The effectiveness of acute rehabilitation treatment for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not yet been established. This study examined the efficacy of treatment provided to patients with severe COVID-19 in an acute care facility. Methods: A total of 98 patients with severe COVID-19 requiring inpatient management in our intensive care unit (ICU) were included between December 2020 and October 2021. They were divided into two groups: those who received physiotherapy (PT group; n=44) and those who did not receive physiotherapy (non-PT group; n=54). Their backgrounds, clinical characteristics, and activities of daily life (ADL) at discharge were compared to examine factors that influenced the need for physiotherapy (PT). We also evaluated the effect of PT on ADL by comparing the Barthel Index (BI) before PT and at discharge. Results: The PT group patients were significantly older, had longer hospital and ICU stays, and used invasive mechanical ventilators (IMV) more frequently than those in the non-PT group. More patients in the non-PT group were able to walk at discharge than in the PT group. The PT group patients showed significant improvement in BI and ADL at discharge when compared with BI at the start of PT, regardless of whether an IMV was used. Conclusions: Older patients with severe COVID-19 with prolonged hospitalization or ICU stay or on an IMV are prone to a decline in ADL and may need to be considered for early PT.
Evaluating the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with COPD and Chronic Heart Failure Post-Hospitalization after COVID-19 Using the EQ-5D and KCCQ Questionnaires

Ilona Emoke Sukosd,Sai Teja Gadde,Myneni Pravallika,Silvius Alexandru Pescariu,Mihaela Prodan,Ana-Olivia Toma,Roxana Manuela Fericean,Ingrid Hrubaru,Oana Silvana Sarau,Ovidiu Fira-Mladinescu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12060124

2024-06-07

Diseases

Abstract:Chronic heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently coexist, significantly impacting health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study evaluated HRQoL in patients with CHF, COPD, or both, three months post-COVID-19 discharge using EQ-5D and KCCQ questionnaires to guide targeted healthcare interventions. We conducted a cross-sectional study at "Victor Babes" Hospital in Timisoara, enrolling 180 patients who had recovered from COVID-19 (60 in each group including CHF, COPD, and both conditions). HRQoL was assessed via EQ-5D and KCCQ. Significant disparities in HRQoL measures were noted across the groups. Patients with both CHF and COPD reported the worst outcomes, especially in terms of hospital stay lengths due to COVID-19 (11.63 days) and initial oxygen saturation levels (88.7%). HRQoL improvements from discharge to three months post-discharge were significant, with EQ-5D mobility scores improving notably across all groups (CHF and COPD: 2.87 to 2.34, p = 0.010). KCCQ results reflected substantial enhancements in physical limitation (CHF and COPD: 38.94 to 58.54, p = 0.001) and quality of life scores (CHF and COPD: 41.38 to 61.92, p = 0.0031). Regression analysis revealed that dual diagnosis (CHF and COPD) significantly impacted usual activities and quality of life (β = -0.252, p = 0.048; β = -0.448, p = 0.017), whereas the initial severity of COVID-19 was a significant predictor of worse HRQoL outcomes (β = -0.298, p = 0.037; β = -0.342, p = 0.024). The presence of both CHF and COPD in patients recovering from COVID-19 was associated with more severe HRQoL impairment compared with either condition alone. These findings emphasize the need for specialized, comprehensive post-COVID-19 recovery programs that address the complex interplay among chronic conditions to optimize patient outcomes and enhance quality of life.
Contemporary assessment of short- and functional 90-days outcome in old intensive care patients suffering from COVID-19

Raphael Romano Bruno,Bernhard Wernly,Antonio Artigas,Kristina Fuest,Stefan J. Schaller,Lisa Dannenberg,Detlef Kindgen-Milles,Malte Kelm,Michael Beil,Sigal Sviri,Muhammed Elhadi,Michael Joannidis,Sandra Oeyen,Eumorfia Kondili,Rui Moreno,Susannah Leaver,Bertrand Guidet,Dylan W. De Lange,Hans Flaatten,Wojciech Szczeklik,Christian Jung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154984

IF: 4.298

2024-12-05

Journal of Critical Care

Abstract:Purpose There are limited data about the outcome of old intensive care (ICU) patients suffering from Covid-19 in the post-vaccination era. This study distinguishes the pre- and post-acute illness living conditions of ICU survivors from non-survivors. Methods This prospective international multicenter study included 642 old (≥ 70 years) ICU patients, including data ranging from pre-illness condition to functional 90-days follow-up. The primary endpoint was the difference of living conditions of ICU-survivors before ICU admission and 90-days after ICU discharge. Secondary outcomes were 90-days mortality, and quality of life. Results A total of 642 patients were included. Significantly more ICU survivors lived at their own homes without support before ICU admission than non-survivors ( p = 0.016), while more non-survivors resided in nursing homes (p = 0.016). ICU mortality was 39 %, 30-days and 90 days mortality were 47 %and 55 %. After 90 days, only 22 % maintained the same living conditions. Surviving patients viewed ICU admission positively after 90 days, while relatives were more uncertain. Quality of life indicated a self-reported average score of 60 (50–75). Conclusion Living conditions influence the outcome of critically ill old patients suffering from Covid-19. Only a minority returned to their initial habitat after ICU survival. Trial registration number NCT04321265

critical care medicine
The relationship between patient‐specific factors and functional progression of COVID‐19 survivors admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility

Sean Dreyer,Christopher Lewis,Kyle Fahey,Hannah Martin,Larissa Pavone,Sofia Anastasopoulos,Gaurish Sohi,Leslie Rydberg,Prakash Jayabalan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13187

2024-05-04

PM&R

Abstract:Background Survivors of hospitalization for severe acute COVID‐19 infection faced significant functional impairments necessitating discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) for intensive rehabilitation prior to discharge home. There remains a lack of large cohort studies of the functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs with COVID‐19‐related impairments and the relationship to patient‐specific factors. Objective To characterize functional outcomes of patients admitted to IRFs for COVID‐19‐related debility and to investigate associations between functional outcomes and patient‐specific factors. Design Multisite retrospective cohort study. Setting Multiple IRFs in a large urban city. Participants Adult patients admitted to IRFs for rehabilitation after hospitalization for acute COVID‐19 infection. Interventions Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcomes included change in GG Self‐Care and Mobility Activities subscales and Functional Independence Measure scores from admission to discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Linear regression analysis was used to relate functional changes to demographic, medical, and hospitalization‐specific factors. Secondary outcomes included discharge destination from the IRF. Results The analysis included n = 362 patients admitted to IRFs for COVID‐19‐related rehabilitation needs. This cohort showed significant improvements in mobility, self‐care, and cognition congregate scores (216.0%, 174.3%, 117.6% respectively). Patient‐specific factors associated with functional improvement, included age, body mass index, premorbid employment status, history of diabetes and cardiac disease and medications received in acute care, and muscle strength upon admission to IRF. Conclusions Patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation for COVID‐19‐related functional deficits made significant functional improvements in mobility, self‐care, and cognition. Many significant associations were found between patient‐specific factors and functional improvement, which support further investigation of these factors as possible predictors of functional improvement in an IRF for COVID‐19‐related deficits.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
Health-related quality of life after 12 months post discharge in patients hospitalised with COVID-19-related severe acute respiratory infection (SARI): a prospective analysis of SF-36 data and correlation with retrospective admission data on age, disease severity, and frailty

Gavin Wright,Keerthi Senthil,Amir Zadeh-Kochek,Jonathan Heung-san Au,Jufen Zhang,Jiawei Huang,Ravi Saripalli,Mohiuddin Khan,Omar Ghauri,San Kim,Zakiuddin Mohammed,Carol Alves,Gouri Koduri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076797

IF: 3.006

2024-03-21

BMJ Open

Abstract:Long-term outcome and 'health-related quality of life' (HRQoL) following hospitalisation for COVID-19-related severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) is limited. Objective To assess the impact of HRQoL in patients hospitalised with COVID-19-related SARI at 1 year post discharge, focusing on the potential impact of age, frailty, and disease severity. Method Routinely collected outcome data on 1207 patients admitted with confirmed COVID-19 related SARI across all three secondary care sites in our NHS trust over 3 months were assessed in this retrospective cohort study. Of those surviving 1 year, we prospectively collected 36-item short form (SF-36) HRQoL questionnaires, comparing three age groups (<49, 49–69, and the over 69-year-olds), the relative impact of frailty (using the Clinical Frailty Score; CFS), and disease severity (using National Early Warning Score; NEWS) on HRQoL domains. Results Overall mortality was 46.5% in admitted patients. In our SF-36 cohort (n=169), there was a significant reduction in all HRQoL domains versus normative data; the most significant reductions were in the physical component (p<0.001) across all ages and the emotional component (p<0.01) in the 49–69 year age group, with age having no additional impact on HRQoL. However, there was a significant correlation between p hysical well-being versus CFS (the correlation coefficient=–0.37, p<0.05), though not NEWS, with no gender difference observed. Conclusion There was a significant reduction in all SF-36 domains at 1 year. Poor CFS at admission was associated with a significant and prolonged impact on physical parameters at 1 year. Age had little impact on the severity of HRQoL, except in the domains of physical functioning and the overall physical component .

medicine, general & internal
Long-Term Effect on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization Compared to Non-hospitalized COVID-19 Patients and Healthy Controls

Emmanouil Koullias,Georgios Fragkiadakis,Maria Papavdi,Georgia Manousopoulou,Triantafyllia Karamani,Helena Avgoustou,Evangelia Kotsi,Dimitris Niakas,Dimitrios Vassilopoulos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31342

2022-11-10

Cureus

Abstract:Background In this study, we aimed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) six months after their hospitalization and compare it to that of non-hospitalized patients with mild COVID-19 and healthy controls. Methodology Participants were enrolled between September 2021 and April 2022 and included hospitalized COVID-19 patients at General Hospital of Athens "Hippocration" who had been discharged at least six months prior to enrollment, non-hospitalized patients with COVID-19, and healthy controls. Collected data included demographics, disease severity, medication history, and comorbidities. Participants completed a EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5Levels (EQ5D5L), a Short Form 36 version 2 (SF36v2), a Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), and a Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale (PCFSS) regarding HRQL before and six months after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. In the case of healthy controls, two sets of questionnaires were completed at least six months apart. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 25 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results A total of 151 participants were enrolled. Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 demonstrated a statistically significant deterioration in most parameters of SF36v2 as well as both parameters of the EQ5D5L and FACIT-F questionnaires. Hospitalized patients exhibited worse results in SF36v2 and EQ5D5L when compared to both healthy controls as well as those with mild COVID-19 (p < 0.05). Hospitalized women, in particular, were shown to fare worse than other women in parameters associated with both mental/psychological and physical health (p < 0.05). Hospitalized patients between 41 and 60 years old demonstrated a statistically significant drop in the scores of all three main questionnaires compared to their previous health status (p < 0.05). Hospitalized patients between 61 and 80 years old exhibited a similar trend, but statistical significance was achieved in fewer parameters. HRQL decline was greater in both age groups compared to that of healthy and milder disease counterparts. There was a significant correlation between the results from the three main questionnaires. Similarly, PCFS scale values were shown to correlate with disease severity (hospitalization or not) and age. Conclusions HRQL remained noticeably impacted six months after hospitalization due to COVID-19. The physical and mental/psychological stress of severe COVID-19 translated into lasting health deterioration, especially for women and those aged 41-60 years old. The use of questionnaires, such as those implemented in this study, might help in the early detection of patients who could benefit from rehabilitation programs. Psychological, as well as physical and social, support is crucial to alleviate the burden of post-COVID-19 symptomatology and expedite the recovery of this group of patients.
Lung function and quality of life one year after severe COVID-19 in Brazil

Marinho,Carolina Coimbra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.36416/1806-3756/e20230261

2024-05-29

Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate symptoms, lung function, and quality of life of a cohort of patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19 12 months after hospital admission. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. We included severe COVID-19 survivors hospitalized in one of three tertiary referral hospitals for COVID-19 in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Participants were submitted to lung function and six-minute walk tests and completed the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. Results: The whole sample comprised 189 COVID-19 survivors (mean age = 59.6 ± 13.4 years) who had been admitted to a ward only (n = 96; 50.8%) or to an ICU (n = 93; 49.2%). At 12 months of follow-up, 43% of patients presented with dyspnea, 27% of whom had a restrictive ventilatory disorder and 18% of whom presented with impaired DLCO. There were no significant differences in FVC, FEV1, and TLC between the survivors with or without dyspnea. However, those who still had dyspnea had significantly more impaired DLCO (14.9% vs. 22.4%; p < 0.020) and poorer quality of life. Conclusions: After one year, survivors of severe COVID-19 in a middle-income country still present with high symptom burden, restrictive ventilatory changes, and loss of quality of life. Ongoing follow-up is needed to characterize long COVID-19 and identify strategies to mitigate its consequences.

respiratory system
Optimal Inter-Frame Alignment for Video Compression

B. Carpentieri,J. Storer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129054194000098

1994-06-01

International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science

Abstract:Quite often a camera that is shooting a video sequence swings or rocks (for example the camera is hand held). For compression of digitized video it can be important to compensate for the motion of the camera by realigning the frames, shifting them one respect to the other, absorbing the movement of the camera. We show that for the general version of optimal frame alignment, the Vector Alignment problem is NP-complete. Moreover we prove that the Run Length Coding Alignment problem, a restricted subcase of the Vector Alignment problem that has direct application in video compression, can be solved in linear time by a dynamic programming algorithm.
[Are calcium channel blockers really useful in cerebral aneurysm surgery?].

P. Mercier,G. Alhayek,T. Rizk,D. Fournier,D. Legall,E. Frébet,P. Menei,G. Guy

Abstract:Two retrospective series of early operated cerebral arterial aneurysms are compared. One series involves 74 patients treated from 1983 to 1987 by vascular volume expansion only. The other series involves 75 patients treated from 1987 to 1990 by vascular volume expansion associated by calcium antagonists (nimodipine or nicardipine). The conclusion is that in our experience, calcium antagonists do not improve the outcome (mortality, cognition findings and return to work) obtained by vascular volume expansion alone. Moreover they put forward that there is no difference between the patients treated by nimodipine and those treated by nicardipine.
Social determinants of health and COVID‐19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation

Hannah Martin,Christopher Lewis,Sean Dreyer,Juliana Couri,Sanchita Sen,Prakash Jayabalan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13141

2024-03-23

PM&R

Abstract:Background Neighborhoods with more social determinants of health (SDOH) risk factors have higher rates of infectivity, morbidity, and mortality from COVID‐19. Patients with severe COVID‐19 infection can have long‐term functional deficits leading to lower quality of life (QoL) and independence measures. Research shows that these patients benefit greatly from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) admission, but there remains a lack of studies investigating long‐term benefits of rehabilitation once patients are returned to their home environment. Objective To determine SDOH factors related to long‐term independence and QoL of COVID‐19 patients after IRF stay. Design Multisite cross‐sectional survey. Setting Two urban IRFs. Main Outcome Measures Primary outcome measures were Post‐COVID Functional Status Scale (PCFS) and Short Form‐36 (SF‐36) scores. Secondary outcomes were quality indicator (QI) scores while at IRF and a health care access questionnaire. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Results Participants (n = 48) who were greater than 1 year post‐IRF stay for severe COVID‐19 were enrolled in the study. Higher SF‐36 scores were associated with male gender (p = .002), higher income (≥ 70,000, p = .04) had a greater odds of a 0 or 1 on the PCFS. Age was not associated with differences. Women were more likely to seek follow‐up care (p = .014). Those who sought follow‐up care reported lower SF‐36 overall and emotional wellness scores, p = .041 and p = .007, respectively. Commonly reported barriers to health care access were financial and time constraints. Conclusions Patients with SDOH risk factors need to be supported in the outpatient setting to maintain functional gains made during IRF stays. Female gender, income, and urban setting are potential predictors for long‐term QoL and independence deficits after rehabilitation for COVID‐19 infection. Low emotional wellness is an indicator for patients to seek out care as far out as 1 year from their rehabilitation stay.

rehabilitation,sport sciences
Disability Following Critical Illness Due to COVID-19—Where to Next?

Luke A McDonald,Thomas C Rollinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12605

2024-11-27

Respiratory Care

Abstract:Advancements in intensive care have significantly increased ICU survivorship.1 However, the landmark papers by Herridge et al2 and Cuthbertson et al3 highlight that survivorship does not equate to recovery. This lack of recovery manifests as physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments that persist following ICU discharge. Collectively, these impairments are termed post–intensive care syndrome (PICS).4 The lasting impact PICS has on survivors of critical illness has prompted clinicians and researchers to report long-term follow-up using self-reported and performance-based outcomes5 in both observational and interventional trials. Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a rapid increase in the number of patients being admitted to ICU.6 During the pandemic, it emerged that some patients had long-term sequelae associated with COVID-19 infection, termed post–COVID-19 condition,7 that were similar to those observed in PICS.8 Understanding the impact of surviving COVID-19 critical illness and how it may differ from post–COVID-19 condition became a priority for clinicians, researchers, and policymakers.8 In the study by da Silva et al,9 published in this issue of Respiratory Care, the authors aimed to assess the disability associated with COVID-19 critical illness survivorship. They compared disability in subjects who received invasive mechanical ventilation with those that did not, at 3 and 6 months after hospital discharge in 2 university hospitals in São Paolo, Brazil. The primary outcome of disability was assessed using the 36-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0). The WHODAS 2.0 classifies severity of disability according to total score, stratified into 5 categories. A ... Correspondence: Luke A McDonald PhD student, Department of Physiotherapy, Level 3, Harold Stokes Building, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. E-mail: luke.mcdonald{at}austin.org.au

respiratory system,critical care medicine
Health-Related Quality of Life Improves in Parallel with FEV1 and 6-Minute Walking Distance Test at Between 3 and 12 Months in Critical COVID-19 Survivors

Stephanie André,Anne-Violette Bruyneel,Audrey Chirumberro,Alain Roman,Marc Claus,Stephane Alard,Nathalie De Vos,Marie Bruyneel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajmo.2023.100055

2023-08-23

Abstract:Background: In COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU)-admitted patients, multiorgan acute complications lead to long-lasting sequelae. The aim of this study was to assess (1) changes in chest CT, pulmonary function test (PFT), functional capacity (6-minute walking distance test (6MWT)), and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) among ICU COVID-19 survivors at 3, 6, and 12 months after ICU discharge and (2) predictors of persistent impairment/improvement in 6MWT and HR-QoL. Methods: ICU COVID-19 survivors were prospectively included. Outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months included PFT, 6MWT, respiratory muscle strength (RMS), HR-QoL (SF-36), Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), and post-COVID Functional Status scale. Results: Eighty-seven survivors were included, from June 3, 2020, to September 2, 2021. At 12 months, 50% of PFT were normal, 46% were restrictive, and 22% showed reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Impaired DLCO was associated with ICU length of stay and age. In mixed linear model analysis, improvements in RMS and mMRC persisted over time regardless of the adjustments applied (P ≤ .050). SF-36 improved in parallel with FEV1 and 6MWT between 3 and 12 months (P ≤ .044), while increment in DLCO correlated with changes in FEV1 and total lung capacity (TLC) (p ≤ 0.026). Conclusions: This longitudinal study demonstrated that improvements in SF-36 occur in parallel with improvements in FEV1 and 6MWT between 3 and 12 months post-ICU discharge in a sample of critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, PFT remained, however, abnormal in 50% of patients. Based on continued improvements observed from 3 to 12 months, it is anticipated that COVID-19 ICU patients will continue to recover similarly to ARDS patients.

A facile and efficient method of enzyme immobilization on silica particles via Michael acceptor film coatings: immobilized catalase in a plug flow reactor

Long-term reduced functional capacity and quality of life in hospitalized COVID-19 patients

Cognitive and Functional Capacity Assessment of Individuals Who Were Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit Due to COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort Study

Clinical and functional status of patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: an observational study at 2-3 months following discharge

Barium versus nonbarium stimuli: differences in taste intensity, chemesthesis, and swallowing behavior in healthy adult women.

Surviving critical COVID-19: How functionality, physical, mental and cognitive outcomes evolve?

Impact of Functional Limitation on Quality of Life among Covid-19 Survivors

Functionality, physical activity, fatigue and quality of life in patients with acute COVID-19 and Long COVID infection

Effects of hospitalization on functional status and health-related quality of life of patients with COVID-19 complications: a literature review

Activity of Daily Living and Walking Ability of Patients with Severe COVID-19 at Discharge from an Acute Care Hospital

Evaluating the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with COPD and Chronic Heart Failure Post-Hospitalization after COVID-19 Using the EQ-5D and KCCQ Questionnaires

Contemporary assessment of short- and functional 90-days outcome in old intensive care patients suffering from COVID-19

The relationship between patient‐specific factors and functional progression of COVID‐19 survivors admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation facility

Health-related quality of life after 12 months post discharge in patients hospitalised with COVID-19-related severe acute respiratory infection (SARI): a prospective analysis of SF-36 data and correlation with retrospective admission data on age, disease severity, and frailty

Long-Term Effect on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Hospitalization Compared to Non-hospitalized COVID-19 Patients and Healthy Controls

Lung function and quality of life one year after severe COVID-19 in Brazil

Optimal Inter-Frame Alignment for Video Compression

[Are calcium channel blockers really useful in cerebral aneurysm surgery?].

Social determinants of health and COVID‐19 recovery after inpatient rehabilitation

Disability Following Critical Illness Due to COVID-19—Where to Next?

Health-Related Quality of Life Improves in Parallel with FEV1 and 6-Minute Walking Distance Test at Between 3 and 12 Months in Critical COVID-19 Survivors