Rotator Cuff Disease
Samuel L. Whittle,R. Buchbinder
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/AITC201501060
IF: 39.2
Annals of Internal Medicine
Abstract:Clinical Slide Set. Rotator Cuff Disease Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder and has a substantial negative effect on quality of life. Its monthly prevalence in the general population is reported to be between 18% and 31%, whereas lifetime prevalence ranges between 6.7% and 66.7% (1). Shoulder pain is the third most frequent musculoskeletal reason to present to primary care (2) and accounts for up to 10% of all referrals to physical therapists (3). Although the natural history of shoulder pain varies and is often self-limiting, up to half of persons who present for care, particularly the elderly, might continue to have pain and/or functional disturbance for up to 2 years after presentation (4). The rotator cuff (RC) comprises the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis, and teres minor muscles, which envelop the shoulder joint and facilitate both movement and dynamic stabilization of the joint throughout its large range of motion. Disorders of the RC are the most common cause of shoulder pain in primary care: In 1 primary care study of shoulder pain presentations, a clinical diagnosis of RC tendinopathy was made in 85% of cases (5). Numerous descriptive terms for pathology affecting the RC and related anatomical structures have been used in clinical practice and the literature. This is often confusing for patients and clinicians alike. The use of “rotator cuff disease” as an umbrella term allows a simpler categorization of all symptomatic disorders of the RC, regardless of mechanism (inflammatory, degenerative, or acute injury) or precise anatomical location (e.g., supraspinatus tendon versus subacromial bursa) (6). Although anatomical descriptions of the RC muscles often imply that they are independent structures, in practice the entire RC acts as an integrated functional unit. RC disease includes diagnostic terms, such as rotator cuff tendinopathy or tendinitis, tears of the cuff muscles, the impingement syndrome, calcific tendinitis, and subacromial bursitis, but excludes adhesive capsulitis (“frozen shoulder”) and other disorders of the glenohumeral joint. The prevalence of RC tears increases with age. In a cross-sectional study in the general population, the prevalence of sonographically defined, full-thickness RC tears was 22.1% and increased with each decade of life from 10.7% for persons in their 50s to 36.6% for persons 80 years or older, and two thirds of tears were asymptomatic (7). The prevalence of partial-thickness tears and altered tendon morphology in the general population is likely to be even greater. Full-thickness RC tears may be detected in as many as 1 in 6 asymptomatic adults in the general population (8), although 1 study reported that up to 50% of older individuals (mean age 70 years, range 52 to 85) with asymptomatic tears develop pain within 5 years (9). Calcific tendinitis is an uncommon form of RC disease (10). The exact pathophysiologic relevance of calcium deposits in the RC tendons is unclear. While calcium deposition may be seen in as many as 6.8% of patients with shoulder pain, prevalence estimates for calcium deposition in the RC of asymptomatic shoulders range from 2% to 20% (11). Prevention What are the risk factors for rotator cuff disease? Risk factors for RC disease are those that affect the structural resilience of the RC and/or place excessive biomechanical demand on the RC. The most important risk factor is age. Age-related changes in collagen composition in the tendons of the RC are seen even in macroscopically normal tendons and are believed to predispose the tendon to the inflammation and failure seen in RC disease. Other intrinsic risk factors include obesity, smoking, diabetes mellitus, genetics, and various anatomical factors, particularly those that reduce the supraspinatus outlet area in the subacromial space (11). The most important extrinsic risk factors are occupational and sporting activities. Although the pathology underlying RC disease is likely to be multifactorial, it is believed that repeated abduction of the shoulder may damage the supraspinatus tendon by impinging on the inferior surface of the acromion. The anatomy of the acromion and development of fatigue or imbalance of muscular strength in the RC muscles may also predispose to subacromial impingement (12). There is evidence that manual work is a predisposing factor for RC disease. In 1 study at a shipyard, the prevalence of supraspinatus tendinitis was higher in welders than in age-matched office workers (13). In a study of manual workers, a higher frequency of exposure to forceful upper-limb tasks that required high hand grip strength was a risk factor for RC tendinitis (14). A more recent study showed that manual labor involving repetitive use of the arms above shoulder level that is perceived by the worker as heavy physical labor is a risk factor for RC disease (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 8.4), although age is a stronger risk factor in a working population (OR, 4.7; CI, 2.2 to 10.0 for men aged 45 to 49 vs. men younger than 40). Other occupational risk factors also seem to be important, including lack of social support from coworkers (15). Professional and recreational athletes who engage in sports with frequent overhead activity (such as tennis, swimming, gymnastics, and volleyball) and particularly sports that involve throwing (such as baseball, cricket, and water polo) are at increased risk for RC disease due to persistent and often severe biomechanical load on the muscles of the RC in an abducted and externally rotated position (16). Injury to the RC may occur even in adolescent athletes. Other professionals that place unusual biomechanical demands on the shoulder, such as orchestral musicians, may also be at increased risk for RC disease. Are there measures that can prevent rotator cuff disease or its recurrence? Interventions in the workplace to reduce excessive overhead activity or loading of the shoulder in the abducted position may help to reduce the risk for RC disease. If overhead activities cannot be avoided or modified, exercises designed to improve the flexibility of the RC and strengthen the muscles of the cuff and the scapular stabilizing muscles may help to prevent RC disease (Figure). Whereas workplace-based interventions and strength training may be effective in reducing nonspecific upper-limb pain in workers, there are no controlled trials that allow for definitive recommendations regarding the prevention of RC pathology for specific occupations (17). Figure. Scapular stabilizing, isometric, and supraspinatus strengthening exercises. There is a consensus that exercise and stretching programs directed at the muscles of the shoulder girdle are worthwhile measures toward minimizing risk for shoulder injury in at-risk athletes; however, no controlled trials have specifically demonstrated the efficacy of this approach. In athletes, training directed at specific shoulder movements (e.g., throwing) may result in unbalanced strength development in the RC muscles, which may interfere with the role of the cuff in centering the humeral head in the glenoid fossa during abduction and predispose to subacromial impingement. Because the infraspinatus is the primary muscle that counteracts the tendency of the deltoid muscle to pull the humeral head superiorly during abduction, preventive exercise regimens in athletes often focus on isolating and preserving the relative strength of the infraspinatus with external rotation exercises (18). Clinical Bottom Line: Prevention RC disease is the most common cause of shoulder pain in primary care. Disorders of the RC increase in prevalence with age, but are frequently asymptomatic or self-limiting. Occupational or sporting activities that require repetitive overhead use of the arms increase the risk for RC disease. Shoulder-strengthening exercises and workplace interventions might help to reduce this risk. Diagnosis What symptoms are suggestive of rotator cuff disease? A complete and accurate history remains fundamental to diagnosis, proper understanding of the personal and occupational impact of the symptoms on the individual patient, and tailoring the management plan. RC disease is common in middle-aged and older persons and usually has a nontraumatic onset, except in the case of acute traumatic RC tears. Patients typically describe pain in the upper arm near the deltoid insertion that is exacerbated by overhead activity or is worse at night, particularly when lying on the affected side (19). Patients may also describe weakness or loss of function, and the symptoms may have important emotional and financial consequences. While history-taking remains the cornerstone of the complete clinical encounter, there is little evidence that allows quantification of the diagnostic utility of individual findings in the history in patients with suspected RC disease. A recent systematic review identified only 2 studies, both of low methodological quality, that investigated the diagnostic accuracy of history-taking for RC disease (20). Neither pain during sleep nor pain with motion was found to be helpful in identifying patients with RC tears. However, there are few data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of individual symptoms in RC disease without tears, and interpretation of existing observational studies is hampered by the diversity of classification systems and descriptions of shoulder disorders (6, 19). What physical examination findings and maneuvers during the examination are helpful? The physical examination plays an important role in the diagnosis of RC disease. Pain in the shoulder may arise from structures including the glenohumeral joint, the glenoid labrum, the joint capsule, the RC, and the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. Referred pain from the viscera and cervical radicular pain should be specifically considered in the history and examination. A standard shoulder examination should include adequate exposure of the shoul