PREDICTORS OF HYPERTENSION

S. Julius,M. Schork
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1978.tb25565.x
IF: 6.499
1978-03-01
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Abstract:THE PROBLEM A good understanding of predictors of hypertension should allow the selection of populations with a sufficiently high incidence of later hypertension to warrant preventive use of antihypertensive drugs. Much more work on predictors of hypertension is needed, however, before it will be possible to select such a group. This is illustrated by the best-known and strongest predictor of future hypertension-so-called borderline hypertension. We use the term “borderline hypertension” to apply to persons ( 1 ) whose blood pressure oscillates between normal (139/89 or less) and elevated ( > 139/89) values and (2) to persons whose average casual blood pressure is in the range of 140-160/90-100. In borderline hypertension, the risk of future hypertension is higher than in the general population; however, the risk is not overwhelming and the majority of patients will not develop hypertension; thus, patients with borderline hypertension cannot be treated as a uniform population with excess morbidity, and it is important to identify the subgroup of future hypertensive patients. The papers upon which this statement are based l-l0 have been discussed in a previous review.” The validity of the statement can be illustrated in the light of results of efficacy of the antihypertensive treatment in mild hypertension utilizing the data from the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study.12 Consider the following projection based on the assumptions that : ( 1 ) the treatment is likely to be less effective in borderline hypertension than in mild hypertension described in the VA Study; and (2) in 5 years 10% of patients with borderline hypertension would progress to develop hypertension of the degree investigated in the VA Study (sustained diastolic 90-115). The first assumption need not be defended; the lower the initial blood pressure, the less is the effectiveness of the treatment.12. l3 The 10% figure for a 5-year incidence of hypertension is based on available literature for middle-aged subjects with previous borderline hypertension (Table 3 in reference 1 1). Using the VA article, page 167, and Figure 2 (page 168), and a 5-year follow-up, the following values were obtained:
What problem does this paper attempt to address?