Deep learning-based image analysis predicts PD-L1 status from 18F-FDG PET/CT images in non-small-cell lung cancer

Chen Liang,Meiyu Zheng,Han Zou,Yu Han,Yingying Zhan,Yu Xing,Chang Liu,Chao Zuo,Jinhai Zou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1402994
2024-09-05
Abstract:Background: There is still a lack of clinically validated biomarkers to screen lung cancer patients suitable for programmed dead cell-1 (PD-1)/programmed dead cell receptor-1 (PD-L1) immunotherapy. Detection of PD-L1 expression is invasively operated, and some PD-L1-negative patients can also benefit from immunotherapy; thus, the joint modeling of both deep learning images and clinical features was used to improve the prediction performance of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Retrospective collection of 101 patients diagnosed with pathology in our hospital who underwent 18F FDG PET/CT scans, with lung cancer tissue Tumor Propulsion Score (TPS) ≥1% as a positive expression. Lesions were extracted after preprocessing PET/CT images, and using deep learning 3D DenseNet121 to learn lesions in PET, CT, and PET/CT images, 1,024 fully connected features were extracted; clinical features (age, gender, smoking/no smoking history, lesion diameter, lesion volume, maximum standard uptake value of lesions [SUVmax], mean standard uptake value of lesions [SUVmean], total lesion glycolysis [TLG]) were combined for joint modeling based on the structured data Category Embedding Model. Results: Area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and accuracy of predicting PD-L1 positive for PET, CT, and PET/CT test groups were 0.814 ± 0.0152, 0.7212 ± 0.0861, and 0.90 ± 0.0605, 0.806 ± 0.023, 0.70 ± 0.074, and 0.950 ± 0.0250, respectively. After joint clinical feature modeling, the AUC and accuracy of predicting PD-L1 positive for PET/CT were 0.96 ± 0.00905 and 0.950 ± 0.0250, respectively. Conclusion: This study combines the features of 18F-FDG PET/CT images with clinical features using deep learning to predict the expression of PD-L1 in NSCLC, suggesting that 18F-FDG PET/CT images can be conducted as biomarkers for PD-L1 expression.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?