Aesthetic assessment instrument for breasts reconstruction

Hianga Fayssa Fernandes Siqueira,Jorge Luiz de Almeida Teixeira,Reginaldo da Silva Lessa Filho,Evânia Curvelo Hora,Maria de Fátima Albuquerque Evangelista,Teresa Cristina Wiltshire Menezes Lisboa,Fernando Vicente de Araújo,Igor Chaves Gomes Luna,Érika de Abreu Costa Brito,Marcela Sampaio Lima,Alex Rodrigues Moura,Phillip Nicolau Guimarães de Almeida,Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto,Carlos Anselmo Lima
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.05.037
IF: 3.022
2024-06-05
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
Abstract:Introduction There are few validated aesthetic assessment instruments in breast reconstruction that use discrete scales to facilitate studies with multiple evaluators. Objective This research aims to propose an aesthetic assessment scale for reconstructed breasts. Methodology A scale was suggested using discrete variables, with responses ranging from 1 to 10, and the responses for each category could be summed to obtain an average, allowing for use in studies with multiple evaluators. To test the instrument suggested by this study, five experienced plastic surgeons assessed 46 patients. For all analyses, a rejection level for the null hypothesis of 5% (p-value < 0.05) was adopted. Results The scale suggested obtained valid intraclass correlation coefficients, with 0.9 for the overall aesthetic evaluation of the breast and the lowest for defining the inframammary fold being 0.77. We observed good diagnostic accuracy in all comparisons, with the area under the curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.97. Regarding convergent validity, we observed correlations of 0.77 (p < 0.001) between breast volume and volume symmetry, 0.66 (p < 0.001) between breast shape and contour naturalness. The test-retest reliability was 0.708, considered good. Conclusion The results of this study support the effectiveness of the proposed new aesthetic evaluation scale, revealing consistency both among different evaluators and over time. Convergent validation strengthens the relationship between the variables of the new scale and those of the Garbay-Lowery scale. Furthermore, the robust diagnostic accuracy highlights the clinical utility of the new scale in assessing aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstructions. Trial registration Not applicable
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?