Conferring alloantigen specificity to regulatory T cells: A comparative analysis of cell preparations undergoing clinical development in transplantation

Ada Sera Kurt,Paula Ruiz,Emmanuelle Landmann,Marwa Elgosbi,Tsz Kan Fung,Elisavet Kodela,Maria-Carlota Londoño,Diana Marin Correa,Elena Perpiñán,Giovanna Lombardi,Niloufar Safinia,Marc Martinez-Llordella,Alberto Sanchez-Fueyo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.09.009
2024-09-19
Abstract:Conferring alloantigen-specificity to ex vivo expanded CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) increases their capacity to counteract effector alloimmune responses following adoptive transfer into transplant recipients. Three strategies are currently undergoing clinical development, which involve the following: (1) expanding Tregs in the presence of donor B cells (donor alloantigen-reactive [DAR] Tregs); (2) culturing Tregs with donor cells in the presence of costimulation blockade (CSB-Tregs); and (3) transducing Tregs with an human leukocyte antigen A2-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-Tregs). Our goal in this study was to assess the relative potency of each of these manufactured Treg products both in vitro and in vivo. When compared with polyclonal Tregs, all 3 manufacturing strategies increased the precursor frequency of alloreactive Tregs, and this was proportional to the overall in vitro immunosuppressive properties of the cell products. Accordingly, CAR-Tregs, which contained the highest frequency of donor-reactive Tregs, exhibited the strongest suppressive effects on a cell-per-cell basis. Similarly, in an in vivo mouse model of graft-vs-host disease, infusion of CAR-Tregs conferred a significantly longer recipient survival than any other Treg product. Our results highlighting the alloantigen-reactivity and associated immunosuppressive properties of different manufactured Treg products have implications for the mechanistic interpretation of currently ongoing clinical trials in transplantation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?