Early surgical decompression in the management of electrical injuries.

C. Holliman,J. Saffle,M. Kravitz,G. Warden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(82)90560-8

1982-12-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and cardiopulmonary function in lung surgery patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

Chunlai Niu,Huan Lin,Zinan Zhang,Qing Wang,Yingjun Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1450711

2024-08-12

Abstract:Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation is considered beneficial for patients undergoing lung surgery, yet its specific impacts on exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and cardiopulmonary function require further elucidation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PR on these outcomes in patients undergoing lung surgery using a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 420 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent lung surgery from January 2022 to May 2024. Among these, 84 patients received PR while 336 did not (control group). Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio yielded 46 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics, spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, respiratory muscle strength, HRQL, and muscle measurements were assessed pre-and post-surgery. Results: Before PSM, significant differences existed between groups, with the PR group being older and having different pulmonary function baselines. After PSM, groups were well-balanced. Postoperatively, the PR group showed significant improvements in FEV1/FVC (64.17% vs. 50.87%, p < 0.001), FEV1 (2.31 L/min vs. 1.75 L/min, p < 0.001), and predicted FVC percentage (88.75% vs. 68.30%, p < 0.001). Cardiovascular responses showed a lower CI during exercise in the PR group post-PSM (6.24 L/min/m2 vs. 7.87 L/min/m2, p < 0.001). In terms of exercise capacity, the PR group had higher maximal WR percentage (104.76% vs. 90.00%, p = 0.017) and peak VO2 (1150.70 mL/min vs. 1004.74 mL/min, p = 0.009). PR also resulted in less leg soreness and lower total CAT scores postoperatively. Muscle measurements indicated significantly smaller reductions in ΔHUESMCSA and percentage change in the PR group. Conclusion: Pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhances exercise capacity, HRQL, and cardiopulmonary function in patients undergoing lung surgery. It also mitigates postoperative muscle loss, underscoring its importance in the postoperative management of lung surgery patients.
Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation is an Effective Way for Better Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients with Risk Factors: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Xin Sun,K. Zhou,Y. Lai,Jue Li,Chu-hong Mo,G. Che,Yanming Wu,Shuai Chang,Yan Wang,Jiao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S267322

2020-09-01

Cancer Management and Research

Abstract:Background To investigate the effectiveness and cost minimization of comprehensive pulmonary rehabilitation (CPR) in lung cancer patients who underwent surgery. Patients and Methods A retrospective observational study based on medical records was conducted, with 2410 lung cancer patients who underwent an operation with/without CPR during the peri-operative period. Variables including clinical characteristics, length of stay (LOS), postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), and hospitalization expenses were compared between the intervention group (IG) and control group (CG). The CPR regimen consists of inspiratory muscle training (IMT), aerobic endurance training, and pharmacotherapy. Results Propensity score matching analysis was performed between two groups, and the ratio of matched patients was 1:4. Finally, 205 cases of IG and 820 cases of CG in the matched cohort of our study were identified. The length of postoperative hospital stay [median: 5 interquartile (4–7) vs 7 (4–8) days, P < 0.001] and drug expenses [7146 (5411–8987) vs 8253 (6048–11,483) ¥, P < 0.001] in the IG were lower compared with the CG. Additionally, the overall incidence of PPCs in the IG was reduced compared with the CG (26.8% vs 36.7%, P = 0.008), including pneumonia (10.7% vs 16.8%, P = 0.035) and atelectasis (8.8% vs 14.0%, P = 0.046). Multivariable analysis showed that CPR intervention (OR = 0.655, 95% CI: 0.430–0.865, P = 0.006), age ≥70 yr (OR = 1.919, 95% CI: 1.342–2.744, P < 0.001), smoking (OR = 2.048, 95% CI: 1.552–2.704, P < 0.001) and COPD (OR = 1.158, 95% CI: 1.160–2.152, P = 0.004) were related to PPCs. Conclusion The retrospective cohort study revealed a lower PPC rate and the shorter postoperative length of stay in the patients receiving CPR, demonstrating the clinical value of CRP as an effective strategy for surgical lung cancer patients with risk factors.

Medicine
Systematic short-term pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer lobectomy: a randomized trial.

K. Zhou,Y. Lai,G. Che,Yuxin Tang,Mingming Wang,Jianhua Su,Peiyuan Qiu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx141

2017-09-01

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Abstract:OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess the impact of a preoperative 1-week, systematic, high-intensity inpatient exercise regimen on patients with lung cancer who had risk factors for postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). METHODS We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 101 subjects of a preoperative, 7-day systematic, integrated, high-intensity pulmonary exercise regimen. The control group received standard preoperative care. We analysed the occurrence of PPCs in both groups as the primary outcome; other outcomes included changes in blood gas, quality of life, peak expiratory flow rate, the 6-min walk distance and others. RESULTS The 6-min walk distance showed an increase of 22.9 ± 25.9 m in the intervention group compared with 4.2 ± 9.2 m in the control group, giving a between-group difference of 18.7 m (95% confidence interval: 8.8-28.6; P < 0.001); the peak expiratory flow increased by 25.2 ± 24.6 l/min, compared with 4.2 ± 7.7 l/min (between-group difference: 21.0 m, 95% confidence interval: 7.2-34.8; P = 0.003). The intervention group had a shorter average total (15.6 ± 3.6 vs 17.7 ± 5.3 days, P = 0.023) and postoperative length of stay (6.1 ± 3.0 vs 8.7 ± 4.6 days, P = 0.001) than the control group; the incidence of PPCs (9.8%, 5/51 vs 28.0%, 14/50, P = 0.019) was significantly lower. A multivariable analysis of the risk of PPCs identified short-term rehabilitation intervention to be an independent risk factor (odds ratio = 0.156, 95% confidence interval: 0.037-0.649, P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS The study results suggested that a systematic, high-intensity pulmonary exercise programme was a practical strategy when performed preoperatively in patients with lung cancer with risk factors for PPCs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ChiCTR-IOR-16008109.

Medicine
Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Postoperative Clinical Status in Patients with Lung Cancer and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lu Wang,Mingwei Yu,Yunfei Ma,Rong Tian,Xiaomin Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4133237

IF: 2.65

2022-03-28

Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract:Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has a curative effect in patients undergoing pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Nevertheless, the contribution of PR to the clinical status of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing lung resection has not been adequately elucidated. The aim of this systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials was to appraise the impact of PR compared to conventional treatment based on postoperative clinical status in patients with lung cancer and COPD. Literature in English from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Citation Index, and Embase databases and in Chinese from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and the WANFANG Database was retrieved from inception to November 2021, employing the keywords “Pulmonary Neoplasms,” “Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases,” “Physical Therapy Modalities,” and “pulmonary rehabilitation.” Only studies that reported PR results were included. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (number: CRD42021224343). A total of nine controlled trials with 651 patients were included. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) were the primary outcome measure. PR decreased the risk of complications after surgery compared to regular treatment (odds ratio (OR) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12–0.37, P < 0.01 ). PR reduced the risk of pneumonia after surgery compared to regular treatment (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.15–0.86, P = 0.02 ). There was a significant difference in the postoperative length of stay (mean difference −2.13 days, 95% CI −2.65 to −1.61 days, P < 0.05 ). PR was an effective intervention that decreased PPCs in patients suffering from lung cancer and COPD. However, due to the limitations of the available data, the results should be interpreted with caution.

integrative & complementary medicine
[FRACTIONATION OF NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEIC ACID ON AGAR-DESOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID COLUMN].

A. Miller

Abstract:
Ultra-short-period Perioperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Short-Term Outcomes after Surgery in Smoking Patients with Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Dingpei Han,Xinyi Wang,Xin Sun,Yuqin Cao,Chengqiang Li,Wei Guo,Yanxia Hu,Junbiao Hang,Jian Li,Qing Xie,Hecheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001856

2024-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Pulmonary rehabilitation is essential for airway management after thoracic surgery. Most current pulmonary rehabilitations are composed of 2-4-week exercises, which require significant consumption of medical resources and concerns about disease progression.MATERIALS AND METHODS:This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled smoking patients with pulmonary masses or nodules suitable for lobectomy, aged 18-80, with smoking history (≥20 pack-years). Eligible patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups. Patients in the intervention group underwent perioperative breathing exercises based on positive pressure vibration expectoration and three-day preoperative lower limb endurance training. Patients in the control group received routine perioperative care. The primary outcome was in-hospital incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary outcomes included postoperative hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, postoperative drainage time, drainage volume, semiquantitative cough strength score, pain score, Borg scale-assessed fatigue, and walking distance on postoperative days 1 and 2.RESULTS:A total of 194 patients were included in the study with 94 in the intervention group and 100 in the control group. Our ultrashort pulmonary rehabilitation program potentially reduced pulmonary complications incidence (24.5% vs. 33.0%), but without statistical significance (P=0.190). No significant differences were found in other perioperative outcomes, except for postoperative semiquantitative cough strength score (3 [interquartile range, 3-3.75] vs. 3 [interquartile range, 2-3], P<0.001) and change in walking distance from postoperative days 1 to 2 (60 [interquartile range, 40-82.5] vs. 30 [interquartile range, 10-60], P=0.003).CONCLUSION:There were no significant differences in postoperative complications and other hospitalizations, but our ultrashort rehabilitation program improved patients' semiquantitative cough strength score and walking distance, indicating potential for better outcomes. This treatment is a safe and effective means of airway management for thoracic surgery in the era of enhanced recovery. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: XXX).
Early prehabilitation reduces admissions and time in hospital in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer

Iain Phillips,Maria Deans,Abi Walton,Mahéva Vallet,Julie Mencnarowksi,Debbie McMillan,Catriona Peacock,Peter Hall,Fiona O’Brien,Mark Stares,Melanie Mackean,Tracie Plant,Robert Grecian,Lindsey Allan,Rebecca Petrie,Duncan Blues,Suraiya Haddad,Colin Barrie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-004869

IF: 4.6332

2024-04-17

BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care

Abstract:Objectives Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the UK. Prehabilitation aims to maximise patient fitness and minimise the negative impact of anticancer treatment. What constitutes prehabilitation before non-surgical anticancer treatment is not well established. We present data from a pilot project of Early prehabilitation In lung Cancer. Methods All new patients with likely advanced lung cancer were offered prehabilitation at respiratory clinic, if fit for further investigation. Prehabilitation included assessment and appropriate intervention from a consultant in palliative medicine, registered dietitian and rehabilitation physiotherapist. Four objective endpoints were identified, namely admissions to hospital, time spent in the hospital, treatment rates and overall survival. Outcomes were to be compared with 178 prehab eligible historical controls diagnosed from 2019 to 2021. Results From July 2021 to June 2023, 65 patients underwent prehabilitation and 72% of patients underwent all 3 interventions. 54 patients had a stage 3 or 4 lung cancer. In the prehab group, fewer patients attended Accident and Emergency (31.5 vs 37.4 attendances per 100 patients) and fewer were admitted (51.9 vs 67.9) when compared with historical controls. Those receiving prehab spent a lot less time in the hospital (129.7 vs 543.5 days per 100 patients) with shorter admissions (2.5 vs 8 days). Systemic anticancer treatment rates increased in the short term but were broadly similar overall. Median survival was higher in the prehabilitation group (0.73 vs 0.41 years, p=0.046). Conclusions Early prehabilitation appears to reduce time spent in the hospital. It may improve survival. Further work is required to understand its full effect on treatment rates.

health care sciences & services
Effectiveness of Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Wei-Hao Chao,Sheng-Hui Tuan,En-Kuei Tang,Yi-Ju Tsai,Jing-Hui Chung,Guan-Bo Chen,Ko-Long Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.900165

IF: 3.9

2022-06-15

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Objectives Patients with lung cancer pose a high risk of morbidity and mortality after lung resection. Those who receive perioperative cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (PRCR) have better prognosis. Peak oxygen consumption (peak VO 2 ), VO 2 at the ventilatory threshold (VO 2 at VT), and slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (V E /V CO2 slope) measured during pre-surgical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) have prognostic values after lung resection. We aimed to investigate the influence of individualized PRCR on postoperative complications in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer with different pre-surgical risks. Methods This was a retrospective study. We recruited 125 patients who underwent VATS for lung cancer between 2017 and 2021. CPET was administered before surgery to evaluate the risk level and PRCR was performed based on the individual risk level defined by peak VO2, VO2 at VT, and VE/VCO2 slope, respectively. The primary outcomes were intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, endotracheal intubation time (ETT), and chest tube insertion time (CTT). The secondary outcomes were postoperative complications (PPCs), including subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, atelectasis, infection, and empyema. Results Three intergroup comparisons based on the risk level by peak VO2 (3 groups), VO2 at VT (2 groups), and VE/VCO2 slope (3 groups) were done. All of the comparisons showed no significant differences in both the primary and secondary outcomes ( p = 0.061–0.910). Conclusion Patients with different risk levels showed comparable prognosis and PPCs after undergoing CPET-guided PRCR. PRCR should be encouraged in patients undergoing VATS for lung cancer.

medicine, general & internal
Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for marginal-function lung cancer patients

Asra Hashmi,Frank A Baciewicz,Ayman O Soubani,Shirish M Gadgeel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0218492316683757

2016-12-05

Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals

Abstract:Background This study aimed to evaluate the impact of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary resection surgery with marginal lung function. Methods Short-term outcomes of 42 patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 s < 1.6 L who underwent lung resection between 01/2006 and 12/2010 were reviewed retrospectively. They were divided into group A (no preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation) and group B (receiving pulmonary rehabilitation). In group B, a second set of pulmonary function tests was obtained. Results There were no significant differences in terms of sex, age, race, pathologic stage, operative procedure, or smoking years. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide in group A was 1.40 ± 0.22 L and 10.28 ± 2.64 g∙dL −1 vs. 1.39 ± 0.13 L and 10.75 ± 2.08 g∙dL −1 in group B. Group B showed significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from 1.39 ± 0.13 to 1.55 ± 0.06 L ( p = 0.02). Mean intensive care unit stay was 6 ± 5 days in group A vs. 9 ± 9 days in group B ( p = 0.22). Mean hospital stay was 10 ± 4 days in group A vs. 14 ± 9 days in group B ( p = 0.31). There was no significant difference in morbidity or mortality between groups. Conclusion Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation can significantly improve forced expiratory volume in 1 s in some marginal patients undergoing lung cancer resection. However, it does not improve length of stay, morbidity, or mortality.
Effectiveness of precise and quantitative rapid pulmonary rehabilitation nursing program for elderly patients with lung cancer during the perioperative period: A randomized controlled trial

Bei Chen,Xiaoxia Yan,Xiaojun Wang,Yanjun Mao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7103

2023-02-18

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract:Objective: Preoperative rehabilitation should improve the functional condition of patients. Improvements in metabolism, lung mechanics, cardiovascular function, and muscle-function can be achieved by pulmonary rehabilitation. Hence, we focused on elderly patients with lung cancer undergoing surgery, and assessed the effectiveness of a rapid and precise pulmonary rehabilitation nursing program during the perioperative period. Methods: This randomized controlled trial at the department of thoracic surgery; Shanghai pulmonary hospital, China during 2021 was conducted amongst 218 elderly patients with lung cancer treated by surgical operation into either a precision quantitative nursing model nursing group (experimental group) or a perioperative routine nursing group (control group). After individual planning of the pulmonary rehabilitation nursing outpatient clinic, nurses distributed breathing trainers, instructed the patients in breathing training, and supervised the patients after the operation. For our evaluation we considered pulmonary function tests, postoperative thoracic drainage tube indwelling times, postoperative hospital stays, postoperative complication rates, and postoperative quality of life results. Results: The experimental group showed better pulmonary function, length of hospital stay, and quality of life outcomes than the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant. However, we found a significantly higher postoperative complications rate in the control group (11.9%) than in the experimental group (3.7%; p=0.02). Conclusion: Strengthening pulmonary rehabilitation nursing interventions for elderly patients with lung cancer during the perioperative period can reduce their postoperative complications and promote their rapid recovery. Clinical Trial: Registration Number - ChiCTR2100042916. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7103 How to cite this: Chen B, Yan X, Wang X, Mao Y. Effectiveness of precise and quantitative rapid pulmonary rehabilitation nursing program for elderly patients with lung cancer during the perioperative period: A randomized controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(2):572-577. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.39.2.7103 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

medicine, general & internal
Effectiveness and Feasibility of Digital Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Taiping Lu,Ting Deng,Yangyang Long,Jin Li,Anmei Hu,Yufan Hu,Li Ouyang,Huiping Wang,Junliang Ma,Shaolin Chen,Jiale Hu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/56795

IF: 7.076

2024-11-13

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has been shown to effectively support postsurgical recovery in patients with lung cancer (LC) at various stages. While digital PR programs offer a potential solution to traditional challenges, such as time and space constraints, their efficacy and feasibility for patients undergoing LC surgery remain unclear. Objective: This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of digital PR programs for individuals undergoing LC surgery. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, retrieving data from 6 English and 4 Chinese databases from their inception to January 1, 2024. References in related studies were also manually reviewed. The primary outcomes assessed were physical capacity, lung function, and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The secondary outcomes were compliance, hospital stay, chest tube duration, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Where applicable, recruitment and withdrawal rates were also evaluated. Meta-analysis and descriptive analysis were used to assess the outcomes. Results: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials and 6 quasi-experimental studies (n=1063) were included, with 4 studies being included in the meta-analyses. Our meta-analyses revealed that digital PR reduced the decline in 6-minute walk distance (6-MWD) by an average of 15 m compared with routine PR programs from admission to discharge, demonstrating a clinically significant improvement in physical capacity (mean difference –15.00, 95% CI –25.65 to –4.34, P =.006). Additionally, digital PR was associated with a reduction (26/58, 45%) in the likelihood of PPCs (risk ratio 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.66, P <.001) and a reduction of 1.53 days in chest tube duration (mean difference –1.53, 95% CI –2.95 to –0.12, P =.03), without a statistically significant effect on postoperative hospital stay (mean difference –1.42, 95% CI –3.45 to 0.62, P =.17). Descriptive analyses suggested that digital PR has the potential to improve knowledge, lung function, quality of life, and self-efficacy, while reducing depression and anxiety. Notably, digital PR was found to be a safe, feasible, and acceptable supplementary intervention. Despite challenges with low recruitment, digital PR enhanced exercise compliance, increased patient satisfaction, and lowered dropout rates. Conclusions: This systematic review is the first comprehensive analysis to suggest that digital PR is a safe, feasible, acceptable, and effective intervention for promoting recovery in patients with LC after surgery. Digital PR has the potential to be a valuable supplement, expanding access to traditional PR programs. Future research should prioritize the development of interactive and inclusive digital solutions tailored to diverse age groups and educational backgrounds. Rigorous studies, including large-scale, high-quality randomized controlled trials with detailed protocols and robust methodologies, are needed to assess the short-, medium-, and long-term efficacy of digital PR, ensuring reproducibility in future research. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023430271; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=430271

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Effect of Preoperative Pulmonary Pehabilitation in Patients with Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Chen Keyu,Yan Meiqiong,Song Yangyang,Zhao Jian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2018.12.012

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy of preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with lung cancer. Methods We searched Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Pubmed, Embase, CNKI, Wan Fang Date, Vip Date and CBM to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental study about perioperative pulmonary rehabilitation applied in lung cancer patients, the retrieval time was from 1990 to 2017. The data was analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software after two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, and evaluated the biased risk of inclusion studies. Results A total of 16 studies were included, including 904 patients, and 8 of them were RCT, and 8 quasi-experimental studies. The results of meta-analysis showed that patients after preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation their the first-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) was increased (MD=0.20, 95%CI: 0.02-0.37, P=0.03), preoperative forced vital capacity (FVC) was increased (MD=0.22,95%CI:0.05-0.38,P=0.009), preoperative distance of 6-minute walking test (6MWT) was increased (MD=44.07, 95%CI: 33.88-54.27, P<0.001), the postoperative hospital stay in the preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation group was shortened (MD=-2.28, 95%CI: -2.77-1.79, P<0.001) and the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications was reduced (OR=0.32,95%CI:0.22-0.49, P< 0.001). Conclusions Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation can improve lung function of patients with lung cancer, shorten the time of postoperative hospitalization and reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through intensive preoperative respiratory rehabilitation in patients with esophageal cancer

J. Inoue,R. Ono,D. Makiura,M. Kashiwa‐Motoyama,Y. Miura,M. Usami,T. Nakamura,T. Imanishi,D. Kuroda,M. Kashiwa-Motoyama

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01336.x

2012-03-12

Diseases of the Esophagus

Abstract:Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) after esophagectomy have been reported to occur in 15.9-30% of patients and lead to increased postoperative morbidity and mortality, prolonged duration of hospital stay, and additional medical costs. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to investigate the possible prevention of PPCs by intensive preoperative respiratory rehabilitation in esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy. The subjects included 100 patients (87 males and 13 females with mean age 66.5 ± 8.6 years) who underwent esophagectomy. They were divided into two groups: 63 patients (53 males and 10 females with mean age 67.4 ± 9.0 years) in the preoperative rehabilitation (PR) group and 37 patients (34 males and 3 females with mean age 65.0 ± 7.8 years) in the non-PR (NPR) group. The PR group received sufficient preoperative respiratory rehabilitation for >7 days, and the NPR group insufficiently received preoperative respiratory rehabilitation or none at all. The results of the logistic regression analysis and multivariate analysis to correct for all considerable confounding factors revealed the rates of PPCs of 6.4% and 24.3% in the PR group and NPR group, respectively. The PR group demonstrated a significantly less incidence rate of PPCs than the NPR group (odds ratio: 0.14, 95% confidential interval: 0.02~0.64). [Correction added after online publication 25 June 2012: confidence interval has been changed from -1.86~ -0.22] This study showed that the intensive preoperative respiratory rehabilitation reduced PPCs in esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy.

gastroenterology & hepatology
Comparison of Surgeries Plus Perioperative and Postoperative Chemotherapies in Chinese Pn2 Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Observational Study.

Jinbo Zhao,Yin Li,Zhenliang Shi,Deruo Liu,Xiangning Fu,Lin Xu,Jian Hu,Heng Zhao,Yang Liu,Lunxu Liu,Haiying Yang,Xiaofei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e20535

IF: 45.3

2018-01-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e20535 Background: Postoperative or perioperative systematic chemotherapies (CTs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been widely accepted due to providing significant clinical benefits of patient survivals compared to the patients with surgical resections alone. In the pN2 NSCLC patients, the superiority of perioperative CTs to postoperative CTs remains controversial. The study was designed to compare treatment outcomes of the perioperative and postoperative CTs in the target population. Methods: The study data on the pN2 NSCLC patients who received curative radical resection from 2014 to 2017 were collected from the LinkDoc database to compare patient prognoses. The OS were measured by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log-Rank test. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was implemented to reduce selection bias. Results: Of all the enrolled 766 patients, 688 (89.8%) patients were administered with postoperative CTs, and 78 (10.2%) patients with perioperative CTs. The medians of the follow-up durations in the patients with postoperative and perioperative chemotherapies plus surgeries were 12 months and 14 months, respectively. No significant OS difference in the patients with surgeries plus postoperative or perioperative chemotherapies was observed regardless of PSM within such short follow-up durations. In the subgroup with postoperative CTs, OS of the patients with adenocarcinoma was superior to that of the patients with squamous cell carcinomas (HR = 0.60, p < 0.01); the three-year OS of the patients with adenocarcinoma was found to be remarkably different from that of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (68.9% vs 48.8%, P < 0.05). The most common complications were pleural effusion, pneumonia, and pneumothorax in the patients with postoperative CTs (5.8%,5.5%,4.2%) and perioperative CTs (6.4%,6.4%,3.8%). Conclusions: Our preliminary analyses showed that there was no significant OS difference in the pN2 NSCLC patients with perioperative and postoperative CTs plus surgeries due to the short follow-up duration. The patients will be followed up for observation of long-term patient survivals. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1800014702.
Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Jiao Wang,Ran Li,Junke Chang,Yan Wang,Yutian Lai,Yingxian Dong,Guowei Che

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067845

IF: 3.006

2023-05-09

BMJ Open

Abstract:Introduction Lung cancer remains a highly fatal disease. Surgical resection has been proven to be the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. The conventional hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is shown to reduce symptoms, improve exercise capacity and impact the quality of life (QoL) for lung cancer patients. To date, scientific evidence on the effectiveness of home-based PR for patients with lung cancer following surgery is scarce. We aim to explore if home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. Methods and analysis This study is a two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from West China Hospital, Sichuan University and randomly allocated to either an outpatient group or a home-based group at a ratio of 1:1. The PR programme involves self-management and exercises. The exercise includes warm-up (10 min), aerobic training (20 min), resistance training (15 min) and cool-down (10 min), lasting 4 weeks, with two sessions per week either at home or in the outpatient setting. The intensity will be adjusted according to the modified Borg rating of perceived exertion and heart rate before and after each exercise session. The primary outcome is QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 & LC 13 after an intervention. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness measured by a 6 min walk test and stair-climbing test and symptom severity measured by patient-reported questionnaires and pulmonary function. The main hypothesis is that home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection. Ethics and dissemination The trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of West China Hospital and is also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Trial registration number ChiCTR2100053714.

medicine, general & internal
Two-Week Multimodal Prehabilitation Program Improves Perioperative Functional Capability in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zijia Liu,Tian Qiu,Lijian Pei,Yuelun Zhang,Li Xu,Yushang Cui,Naixin Liang,Shanqing Li,Wei Chen,Yuguang Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0000000000004342

2019-01-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Patients with lung cancer often experience reduced functional capacity and quality of life after surgery. The current study investigated the impact of a short-term, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation program on perioperative functional capacity in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 73 patients. Patients in the prehabilitation group (n = 37) received a 2-week multimodal intervention program before surgery, including aerobic and resistance exercises, respiratory training, nutrition counseling with whey protein supplementation, and psychological guidance. Patients in the control group (n = 36) received the usual clinical care. The assessors were blinded to the patient allocation. The primary outcome was perioperative functional capacity measured as the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), which was assessed at 1 day before and 30 days after surgery. A linear mixed-effects model was built to analyze the perioperative 6MWD. Other outcomes included lung function, disability and psychometric evaluations, length of stay (LOS), short-term recovery quality, postoperative complications, and mortality. RESULTS: The median duration of prehabilitation was 15 days. The average 6MWD was 60.9 m higher perioperatively in the prehabilitation group compared to the control group (95% confidence interval [CI], 32.4–89.5; P < .001). There were no differences in lung function, disability and psychological assessment, LOS, short-term recovery quality, postoperative complications, and mortality, except for forced vital capacity (FVC; 0.35 L higher in the prehabilitation group, 95% CI, 0.05–0.66; P = .021). CONCLUSIONS: A 2-week, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation program could produce clinically relevant improvements in perioperative functional capacity in patients undergoing VATS lobectomy for lung cancer.
Prehabilitation in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: Current Situation and Future Perspectives

Zi-Jia Liu,Yue-Lun Zhang,Yu-Guang Huang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1930

2020-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Disease

Abstract:J Thorac Dis 2020;12(8):4578-4580 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1930 We thank Prof. Giles et al. from Canada for their thoughtful comments and suggestions about our recent article (1). Our group published a study in Anesth Analg, reporting that a 2-week, home-based, multimodal prehabilitation strategy could produce clinically relevant improvements of perioperative functional capacity assessed via the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in patients undergoing videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer (2). In this randomized controlled study, we enrolled 73 patients (37 in the prehabilitation group and 36 in the control group). The simple home-based, multimodal prehabilitation program includes aerobic and resistance exercises, respiratory training, nutrition counseling with whey protein supplementation, and psychological guidance utilizing a pictured instruction booklet, completion diaries, and regular visits to encourage adherence. Many studies have been published regarding preoperative exercise for lung cancer. However, though positive conclusions are often reported, heterogeneity is extremely obvious from differences in interventions, and population and outcome measurements, especially preoperative training interventions (3). All exercise modes in the published literature focus mainly on aerobic exercise with or without resistance exercise and inspiratory muscle training (IMT) (4-12). However, our study contributed most to the innovation of patient-centered multimodal prehabilitation methods for patients undergoing VATS lobectomy by including respiratory training, nutritional supplements, and psychological optimization. Based on our limited clinical practice experience, we also made improvements to exercise duration, modality, and place compared with other forms of preoperative training associated with pulmonary surgery. Instead of advocating fixed forms of exercise, our patients could choose any form of aerobic exercise at their discretion with restrained frequencies, durations, and intensities to improve acceptance (4-8,11,12). Considering that the urge to proceed with surgery requires shorter exercise interventions, the duration of prehabilitation was simplified to approximately 2 weeks, compared with 4–8 weeks in most published studies (4,8-11). We found that it was also more convenient for patients to perform the prehabilitation program at home under various types of guidance including telephone follow-up (8). We therefore tried to establish a more flexible, feasible, and economical way of benefitting the clinical wide-range application of prehabilitation programs that may occur in the near future. As noted by Giles et al., both intervention and control groups in our analysis were primarily fit and young (mean, 56 years old), with baseline pulmonary functions within normal levels (FEV1 and FVC >90% predicted, FEV1/ FVC >70%), although the inclusion criteria were not strictly restricted to age (adult patients <70 years old) or preoperative pulmonary function. Giles et al. commented that these factors might limit the generalizability and practical significance of this study, which we also mentioned in our publication. However, we noted a rising trend of lung cancer incidence in females and in the younger population in China (13,14), and the fact that increasing numbers of Letter to the Editor
Rapid Recovery of Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients with Lung Cancer and Influencing Factors

Yang Fuzhi,Tang Dongfang,Wentao Fu,Jing Wang,Wu Yingting,Mo Nianping,Wen Gao,Xiaoyong Shen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.927108

IF: 4.7

2022-01-01

Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract:Among malignant tumors, lung cancer has the highest morbidity and mortality worldwide. Surgery is the first-line treatment for early-stage lung cancers, and has gradually advanced from conventional open-chest surgery to video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). Additionally, increasingly smaller surgical incisions and less surgical trauma have resulted in reduced pulmonary function damage. Previous studies have found that the level of pulmonary function loss and recovery is significantly correlated with postoperative complications and the quality of life. Thus, an accurate assessment of the preoperative pulmonary function and effective rehabilitation of postoperative pulmonary function are highly important for patients undergoing lung surgery. In addition, pulmonary function assessment after pulmonary rehabilitation serves as an objective indicator of the postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation status and is crucial to facilitating pulmonary function recovery. Furthermore, a complete preoperative assessment and effective rehabilitation are especially critical in elderly patients with pulmonary tumors, poor basic physiological functions, comorbid lung diseases, and other underlying diseases. In this review, we summarize the clinical significance of pulmonary function assessment in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery, postoperative changes in pulmonary function, effective pulmonary function rehabilitation, and the influencing factors of pulmonary function rehabilitation.
P3.16-35 Stair Climbing Exercise May Ameliorate Pulmonary Function Impairment in Patients at One Month after Lung Cancer Resection

Y. Wang,S. Yan,X. Wang,X. Li,S. Li,Y. Yang,W. Nan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.08.1942

IF: 20.121

2018-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract:Surgical resection remains the primary treatment for patients with localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite the possibility of a cure, lung resection is associated with an immediate pulmonary function impairment. Stair-climbing test as a reliable indicator of pulmonary function, is often performed preoperatively to select patients. It also has been reported that stair-climbing yielding greater values of VO2 is a more stressful exercise than cycle ergometry. The benefits of this intervention in postoperative patients remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of performance at the postoperative symptom-limited stair climbing exercise on pulmonary function. We retrospectively analyzed 36 consecutive NSCLC patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy and systematic mediastinal lymphadenectomy from November 2017 to January 2018. In the postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation program, all patients were suggested to perform symptom-limited stair climbing exercise in addition to routine physiotherapy (walking, incentive spirometry, breathing) from the first day after surgery. Patients were encouraged to climb gradually to the maximum number of floors at a pace of their own choice, and to stop in case of exhaustion, insufferable pain, limiting dyspnea or leg fatigue. A nursing professional was indispensable for the management of chest drains and supervision of any symptoms. Heart rate, pulse oxygen saturation were continuously measured using a portable pulse oximeter. Stair climbing exercise was performed at least twice a day during and after hospital stay. According to their performance of the exercise, patients could be divided into two groups. Stair climbing group completed the exercise training as planned, while routine physiotherapy group was reluctant to stair climbing exercise except for routine physiotherapy. Pulmonary functions were performed on all patients preoperatively and at one month postoperatively. Totally, 25 patients (15 in stair climbing group and 10 in routine physiotherapy group) were included in the final analysis. The average preoperative and postoperative FEV1 for patients in two groups were 2.69±0.83 L vs. 3.08±0.72 L (p=0.244) and 2.08±0.72 L vs. 2.23±0.60 L (p=0.592), respectively. The difference in FEV1 decline between stair climbing group and routine physiotherapy group was significant (0.61±0.26 L vs. 0.84 ± 0.23 L, p=0.032). This study suggested that symptom-limited stair climbing as a more stressful exercise performed postoperatively in patients may ameliorate pulmonary function impairment at one month after lung resection. Prospective randomized controlled trials are therefore warranted.
Your preoperative rehabilitation assistant: A study protocol for the impact of a telemedicine-supported preoperative home rehabilitation program on the prognosis of patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery

Qihang Sun,Willis Wasonga Omindo,Wanjun Liu,Yan Huang,Ruijie Zhang,Yan Qian,Xianping Li,Ruixing Qiu,Shubin Zheng,Wei Ping,Ni Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076241258362

2024-06-05

Abstract:Background: Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness levels are associated with increased short-term complications after surgery, and potentially exert long-lasting effects on the postoperative lives, work and educational pursuits of patients. Currently, research suggests that lifestyle interventions, such as preoperative physical exercise undertaken by patients themselves, may improve patients' cardiopulmonary fitness and reduce post-operative complications. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and feasibility of a remote medical supervision model for prehabilitation exercise in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumour resection surgery. Methods/design: All enrolled patients will participate in a 4-week pre-operative exercise intervention to improve their cardiorespiratory fitness. During this period, patients will wear wearable devices and exercise at home based on exercise prescriptions. The exercise prescription comprises aerobic exercise (three times a week or more), muscle strengthening exercise (twice a week or more), and respiratory muscle exercise (once a day). The primary aim is to investigate whether baseline VO2max could be improved following a 4-week preoperative exercise program. Secondary objectives include changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s and forced vital capacity, degree of acceptance of the technology, quality of life, handgrip strength, postoperative complication rate and length of hospital stay. Discussion: This study aims to evaluate the influence of preoperative prehabilitation exercises in a telemedicine active supervision mode in patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung tumour resection. As such, results of this trial might have some impact on future implementations of group- and home-based prehabilitation exercises in lung cancers. Trial registration: This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (approval number: TJ-IRB20220564) with registration at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT05608759).

Early surgical decompression in the management of electrical injuries.

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and cardiopulmonary function in lung surgery patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation is an Effective Way for Better Postoperative Outcomes in Surgical Lung Cancer Patients with Risk Factors: A Propensity Score-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Systematic short-term pulmonary rehabilitation before lung cancer lobectomy: a randomized trial.

Effect of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Postoperative Clinical Status in Patients with Lung Cancer and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

[FRACTIONATION OF NUCLEAR RIBONUCLEIC ACID ON AGAR-DESOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID COLUMN].

Ultra-short-period Perioperative Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Short-Term Outcomes after Surgery in Smoking Patients with Lung Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Early prehabilitation reduces admissions and time in hospital in patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer

Effectiveness of Perioperative Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Lung Cancer Undergoing Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Preoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for marginal-function lung cancer patients

Effectiveness of precise and quantitative rapid pulmonary rehabilitation nursing program for elderly patients with lung cancer during the perioperative period: A randomized controlled trial

Effectiveness and Feasibility of Digital Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Effect of Preoperative Pulmonary Pehabilitation in Patients with Lung Cancer: a Meta-analysis

Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through intensive preoperative respiratory rehabilitation in patients with esophageal cancer

Comparison of Surgeries Plus Perioperative and Postoperative Chemotherapies in Chinese Pn2 Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Observational Study.

Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

Two-Week Multimodal Prehabilitation Program Improves Perioperative Functional Capability in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Prehabilitation in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: Current Situation and Future Perspectives

Rapid Recovery of Postoperative Pulmonary Function in Patients with Lung Cancer and Influencing Factors

P3.16-35 Stair Climbing Exercise May Ameliorate Pulmonary Function Impairment in Patients at One Month after Lung Cancer Resection

Your preoperative rehabilitation assistant: A study protocol for the impact of a telemedicine-supported preoperative home rehabilitation program on the prognosis of patients undergoing thoracoscopic surgery