ZFP64 drives glycolysis-mediated stem cell-like properties and tumorigenesis in breast cancer

Jiayi Sun,Jinquan Liu,Yudong Hou,Jianheng Bao,Teng Wang,Longbi Liu,Yidan Zhang,Rui Zhong,Zhenxuan Sun,Yan Ye,Jintao Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13062-024-00533-7
2024-09-18
Abstract:Background: Breast cancer (BC) is a great clinical challenge because of its aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Zinc Finger Protein 64 (ZFP64), as a transcriptional factor, is responsible for the development and progression of cancers. This study aims to investigate whether ZFP64 regulates stem cell-like properties and tumorigenesis in BC by the glycolytic pathway. Results: It was demonstrated that ZFP64 was overexpressed in BC specimens compared to adjacent normal tissues, and patients with high ZFP64 expression had shorter overall survival and disease-free survival. The analysis of the association of ZFP64 expression with clinicopathological characteristics showed that high ZFP64 expression is closely associated with N stage, TNM stage, and progesterone receptor status. Knockdown of ZFP64 suppressed the viability and colony formation capacity of BC cells by CCK8 and colony formation assays. The subcutaneous xenograft models revealed that ZFP64 knockdown reduced the volume of formatted tumors, and decreased Ki67 expression in tumors. The opposite effects on cell proliferation and tumorigenesis were demonstrated by ZFP64 overexpression. Furthermore, we suggested that the stem cell-like properties of BC cells were inhibited by ZFP64 depletion, as evidenced by the decreased size and number of formatted mammospheres, the downregulated expressions of OCT4, Nanog, and SOX2 proteins, as well as the reduced proportion of CD44+/CD24- subpopulations. Mechanistically, glycolysis was revealed to mediate the effect of ZFP64 using mRNA-seq analysis. Results showed that ZFP64 knockdown blocked the glycolytic process, as indicated by decreasing glycolytic metabolites, inhibiting glucose consumption, and reducing lactate and ATP production. As a transcription factor, we identified that ZFP64 was directly bound to the promoters of glycolysis-related genes (ALDOC, ENO2, HK2, and SPAG4), and induced the transcription of these genes by ChIP and dual-luciferase reporter assays. Blocking the glycolytic pathway by the inhibition of glycolytic enzymes ENO2/HK2 suppressed the high proliferation and stem cell-like properties of BC cells induced by ZFP64 overexpression. Conclusions: These data support that ZFP64 promotes stem cell-like properties and tumorigenesis of BC by activating glycolysis in a transcriptional mechanism.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?