Effect of phosphate on the arginine-induced insulin release by the isolated perfused rat pancreas.

J. Campillo,A. Luyckx,P. Lefèbvre

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9167-2_28

Advances in experimental medicine and biology

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Pain after outpatient surgical procedures—a survey of 330 000 patients

Philipp Baumbach,Johannes Dreiling,Christin Arnold,Claudia Weinmann,Marcus Komann,Klaus Bäcker,Axel Neumann,Jörg Karst,Winfried Meißner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0235

2024-02-09

Deutsches Ärzteblatt international

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Approximately 8.1 million outpatient surgical procedures were performed in Germany in 2021. Little is known about the quality of postoperative pain treatment in the outpatient sector.METHODS: The AQS1 project comprises a combined survey of patients and staff in the framework of quality control for ambulatory surgery. The primary endpoint of this study was the prevalence of relevant incisional pain (≥ 4/10 on the numerical rating scale) up to postoperative day 3. Secondary endpoints included prognostic variables for pain and pain-associated outcomes, based on the AQS1 patient questionnaire. Moreover, mixed regression models were used to analyze potential prognostic variables and associations of pain with other outcomes (study registration number DRKS00028052).RESULTS: Data from 330 008 patients were evaluated (from 1 July 2001 to 31 December 2021). The overall prevalence of relevant incisional pain up to postoperative day 3 was 22.5%, with major differences between different types of procedure (3.2%-51.2%). Pain was most common after hemorrhoid surgery (51.2%) and the laparoscopic lysis of large and small bowel adhesions (45.4%). The main associations of relevant pain were with younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [1.82; 1.91]), early postoperative pain (1.34, [1.30; 1.39]), inadequate provision of analgesics (2.90, [2.71; 3.09]), and surgical wound infections (2.60, [2.43; 2.78]). Patients with pain reported lower overall satisfaction with the procedure and a longer inability to work.CONCLUSION: These data have not been tested for representativeness. They can serve as a point of departure for the optimization of individualized perioperative pain therapy and for the planning of prospective studies.

medicine, general & internal
Health-related quality of life among general practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany: Cross sectional survey

Hong-Mei Wang,Martin Beyer,Jochen Gensichen,Ferdinand M Gerlach

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-246

IF: 4.5

2008-01-01

BMC Public Health

Abstract:Background This study was carried out to compare the HRQoL of patients in general practice with differing chronic diseases with the HRQoL of patients without chronic conditions, to evaluate the HRQoL of general practice patients in Germany compared with the HRQoL of the general population, and to explore the influence of different chronic diseases on patients' HRQoL, independently of the effects of multiple confounding variables. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire survey including the SF-36, the EQ-5D and demographic questions was conducted in 20 general practices in Germany. 1009 consecutive patients aged 15–89 participated. The SF-36 scale scores of general practice patients with differing chronic diseases were compared with those of patients without chronic conditions. Differences in the SF-36 scale/summary scores and proportions in the EQ-5D dimensions between patients and the general population were analyzed. Independent effects of chronic conditions and demographic variables on the HRQoL were analyzed using multivariable linear regression and polynomial regression models. Results The HRQoL for general practice patients with differing chronic diseases tended to show more physical than mental health impairments compared with the reference group of patients without. Patients in general practice in Germany had considerably lower SF-36 scores than the general population ( P < 0.001 for all) and showed significantly higher proportions of problems in all EQ-5D dimensions except for the self-care dimension ( P < 0.001 for all). The mean EQ VAS for general practice patients was lower than that for the general population (69.2 versus 77.4, P < 0.001). The HRQoL for general practice patients in Germany seemed to be more strongly affected by diseases like depression, back pain, OA of the knee, and cancer than by hypertension and diabetes. Conclusion General practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany had impaired quality of life, especially in terms of physical health. The independent impacts on the HRQoL were different depending on the type of chronic disease. Findings from this study might help health professionals to concern more influential diseases in primary care from the patient's perspective.
Integration of Complementary Medicine for Multilocal Chronic Pain: Treatment Results From the Patient Perspective

Tobias Romeyke

Abstract:Context: Chronic pain affects individuals' quality of life, physical functionality, and psychological well-being. In the case of multifactorial diseases with an increasing tendency to become chronic, individual therapies often can't alleviate symptoms. The integration of recognized naturopathic methods into a variety of therapies could increase their success. Objective: The study intended to assess the benefits of integration of recognized naturopathic therapy methods into acute care as an option that provides holistic, patient-centered treatment. Design: The author performed a case study. Setting: The study took place at Waldhausklinik-Acute Hospital for Internal Medicine, Pain Therapy, Complementary and Individualized Patient-centered Medicine in Deuringen, Germany. Participant: The participant was a 40-year-old female patient who had been admitted to the hospital for inpatient treatment, with acutely exacerbated, multilocular pain with advanced chronification in combination with concomitant pain-creating, sustained psychological illness. Intervention: In addition to conventional medical therapy, the participant received a complex, naturopathic treatment under operation and procedure key 8-975 (The German procedure classification (Operationen- und Prozedurenschlüssel - OPS) is the official classification for the encoding of operations, procedures and general medical measures) with high density. The medical team used physical and physiotherapeutic units, drainage therapies, relaxation methods, behavior therapy, mind-body therapy, exercise therapy, hydro- and thermotherapy, and acupuncture. Outcomes measures: The study used the following outcome measures: (1) a VAS for pain, (2) an assessment of physical symptoms according to Zerssen, (3) the Pain Disability Index (PDI), (4) the Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire (FFbH), (5) the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-D), and (6) adverse effects. Results: The participant's pain significantly decreased, and she slowly achieved mobility: (1) her pain score on the VAS decreased from 9.3/10 to 4/10; (2) her complaints list decreased from 28 points to 8 points; (3) her score on the PDI decreased from 59.8 points to 15.2 points; (4) her score on the FFbH increased from 55% to 66%; (5) her score on the PHQ-D decreased from 25 points to 2 points; (6) she experienced no adverse effects. Conclusions: The complex naturopathic treatment is a procedure that can lead to positive therapy results, especially in the case of serious chronic illnesses that are accompanied by acute flare-ups. In the case of progression of severe chronic pain, medical practitioners should consider a multimodal therapy with the integration of naturopathic methods. In the past, the assessment of individual complementary techniques for individual clinical pictures has predominated. The aim of further research should be the use of several methods as multimodal therapies to meet the needs of patients with complex clinical pictures.
Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment

Harald Breivik,Beverly Collett,Vittorio Ventafridda,Rob Cohen,Derek Gallacher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009

2006-05-01

European Journal of Pain

Abstract:This large scale computer-assisted telephone survey was undertaken to explore the prevalence, severity, treatment and impact of chronic pain in 15 European countries and Israel. Screening interviews identified respondents aged 18 years with chronic pain for in-depth interviews. 19% of 46,394 respondents willing to participate (refusal rate 46%) had suffered pain for 6 months, had experienced pain in the last month and several times during the last week. Their pain intensity was 5 on a 10-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (1 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable) during last episode of pain. In-depth interviews with 4839 respondents with chronic pain (about 300 per country) showed: 66% had moderate pain (NRS = 5-7), 34% had severe pain (NRS = 8-10), 46% had constant pain, 54% had intermittent pain. 59% had suffered with pain for two to 15 years, 21% had been diagnosed with depression because of their pain, 61% were less able or unable to work outside the home, 19% had lost their job and 13% had changed jobs because of their pain. 60% visited their doctor about their pain 2-9 times in the last six months. Only 2% were currently treated by a pain management specialist. One-third of the chronic pain sufferers were currently not being treated. Two-thirds used non-medication treatments, e.g,. massage (30%), physical therapy (21%), acupuncture (13%). Almost half were taking non-prescription analgesics; 'over the counter' (OTC) NSAIDs (55%), paracetamol (43%), weak opioids (13%). Two-thirds were taking prescription medicines: NSAIDs (44%), weak opioids (23%), paracetamol (18%), COX-2 inhibitors (1-36%), and strong opioids (5%). Forty percent had inadequate management of their pain. Interesting differences between countries were observed, possibly reflecting differences in cultural background and local traditions in managing chronic pain.CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pain of moderate to severe intensity occurs in 19% of adult Europeans, seriously affecting the quality of their social and working lives. Very few were managed by pain specialists and nearly half received inadequate pain management. Although differences were observed between the 16 countries, we have documented that chronic pain is a major health care problem in Europe that needs to be taken more seriously.

neurosciences,clinical neurology,anesthesiology
PAIN2.0: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week outpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy to manage recurrent pain for patients with risk factors of developing chronic pain in Germany

Sandra Meyer-Moock,Daniel Szczotkowski,Leonie Schouten,Frank Petzke,Lena Milch,Beatrice Metz-Oster,Louise Zinndorf,Christian Geber,Greta Hoffmann,Anke Preißler,Ursula Marschall,Felix Rottke,Anja Waidner,André Möller,Thomas Isenberg,Gabriele Lindena,Anne Gärtner,Ulrike Kaiser,Thomas Kohlmann

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-07975-4

IF: 2.728

2024-02-25

Trials

Abstract:Up to 27% of the German population suffers from recurrent or persistent pain (lasting more than three months). Therefore, prevention of chronic pain is one major object of pain management interventions. The aim of this nationwide, multicentre, randomised controlled trial is to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week ambulatory (outpatient) interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (A-IMPT) for patients with recurrent pain and at risk of developing chronic pain. This project was initiated by the German Pain Society (Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft e.V.) and the public health insurance provider BARMER. It is currently funded by the German Innovation Fund (01NVF20023). The study PAIN2.0 focuses on reducing pain intensity and pain-related disability and investigates whether this intervention can improve physical activity, psychological well-being, and health literacy.

medicine, research & experimental
Prevalence of prehospital pain and pain assessment difference between patients and paramedics: a prospective cross-sectional observational study

David Häske,Wolfgang Dorau,Fabian Eppler,Niklas Heinemann,Florian Metzger,Benjamin Schempf

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56072-8

IF: 4.6

2024-03-09

Scientific Reports

Abstract:Adequate analgesia is one of the most important interventions in emergency medicine. However, studies suggest that many patients are undertreated for pain. There can be many reasons why patients assess their pain differently to the paramedics. This study aimed to assess the differences in pain ratings between patients and paramedics and factors influencing them in prehospital emergencies. This prospective cross-sectional observational study included patients treated and transported by paramedics or paramedics and emergency physicians of the German Red Cross in Reutlingen, Germany. This study included 6,365 patients. The prevalence of pain was 49.7%. Among patients with a self-reported numerical rating scale (NRS) > 0, the mean patient pain rating was NRS 4.2 ± 2.7, while the mean paramedic pain rating was NRS 3.6 ± 2.4 ( p < 0.001). Approximately 11.8% (n = 751) of patients reported subjectively unbearable pain. Patients reported a mean NRS of 7.7 ± 1.8 for unbearable pain, but a mean NRS of 3.3 ± 2.0 for bearable pain ( p < 0.001). The difference in pain ratings between patients and paramedics increased with pain severity. Univariate analysis showed that there were no gender differences, but the difference in pain rating was influenced by patient age ( p < 0.001) and paramedic age ( p = 0.042). The differences in pain ratings were particularly pronounced for abdominal diseases ( p < 0.001) and trauma ( p < 0.001). There is a difference in pain ratings between patients and paramedics, which increases with pain severity and appears to be associated with the patient's age and the paramedic's age. To determine the desire and need for analgesics, the question about unbearable pain is a good addition to the NRS.

multidisciplinary sciences
[Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: does the dose make a difference? : A comparison from routine clinical care]

Philipp Baumbach,Peter Storch,Thomas Weiss,Winfried Meissner,Fabian Rottstädt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-024-00838-6

2024-10-09

Schmerz

Abstract:Background: Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy (IMPT) is an established treatment for patients with severe chronic pain. Little evidence is available on the role of treatment dosage and, in particular, on the association between the duration of IMPT and treatment outcome. Aim: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the medium-term treatment success of a short inpatient (SIT, 1 week) and a long outpatient (LOT, 4 weeks) IMPT with a comparable treatment concept and comparable therapy intensity (20 h/week) in patients with severe chronic pain. Methods: Patients in both groups completed the German Pain Questionnaire at the beginning and end of IMPT as well as after 3 months. Primary outcome measures included pain-related impairment and average pain intensity at follow-up in patients of comparable sex, age as well as pain intensity and impairment at the beginning of the therapy. Results: While both groups initially showed significant treatment effects in pain-related impairment and average pain intensity, LOT patients (n = 32) reported significantly better values in both variables at 3‑month follow-up compared with SIT patients (n = 32). This was due to sustained positive effects in LOT patients and worsening in the SIT group. Conclusion: The results indicate that initial treatment effects can be observed in both treatment settings, but a longer duration of therapy seems to favour the long-term stability of treatment effects.
Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study

Heike Hansen,Ingmar Schäfer,Sarah Porzelt,Agata Kazek,Dagmar Lühmann,Martin Scherer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01180-3

IF: 2.6338

2020-06-17

BMC Family Practice

Abstract:Abstract Background In most countries, the general practitioner (GP) is the first point of contact in the healthcare system and coordinator of healthcare. However, in Germany it is possible to consult an outpatient specialist even without referral. Coordination by a GP might thus reduce health expenditures and inequalities in the healthcare system. The study describes the patients’ willingness/commitment to use the GP as coordinator of healthcare and identifies regional and patient-related factors associated with the aforementioned commitment to the GP. Methods Cross-sectional observational study using a standardised telephone patient survey in northern Germany. All counties and independent cities within a radius of 120 km around Hamburg were divided into three regional categories (urban areas, environs, rural areas) and stratified proportionally to the population size. Patients who had consulted the GP within the previous three months, and had been patients of the practice for at least three years were randomly selected from medical records of primary care practices in these districts and recruited for the study. Multivariate linear regression models adjusted for random effects at the level of federal states, administrative districts and practices were used as statistical analysis methods. Results Eight hundred eleven patients (25.1%) from 186 practices and 34 administrative districts were interviewed. The patient commitment to a GP attained an average of 20 out of 24 possible points. Significant differences were found by sex (male vs. female: + 1.14 points, p < 0.001), morbidity (+ 0.10 per disease, p = 0.043), education (high vs. low: − 1.74, p < 0.001), logarithmised household net adjusted disposable income (− 0.93 per step on the logarithmic scale, p = 0.004), regional category (urban areas: − 0.85, p = 0.022; environs: − 0.80, p = 0.045) and healthcare utilisation (each GP contact: + 0.30, p < 0.001; each contact to a medical specialist: − 0.75, p = 0.018). Professional situation and age were not significantly associated with the GP commitment. Conclusion On average, the patients’ commitment to their GP was relatively strong, but there were large differences between patient groups. An increase in the patient commitment to the GP could be achieved through better patient information and targeted interventions, e.g. to women or patients from regions of higher urban density. Trial registration The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02558322 ).

medicine, general & internal,primary health care
Localised neuropathic pain in the primary care setting: a cross-sectional study of prevalence, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, quality of life and sleep performance

Gerard Mick,Mick Serpell,Ralf Baron,Victor Mayoral,Guy Hans,Ignacio Mendez,Esther Artime,Nawab Qizilbash,Melanie Sohns

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1846174

2020-11-23

Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract:<span> Localised Neuropathic Pain (LNP) is challenging to diagnose and manage in primary care. To describe clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, quality of life and sleep performance of patients with LNP and estimate its prevalence in primary care. Cross-sectional study in 4 European countries. Patients were identified using a screening tool for LNP. Patients completed the EQ-5D VAS score and Chronic Pain Sleep Inventory (CPSI). There were 1030 LNP patients for analysis. They presented a median pain intensity of 6.0 (IQR 4.0–7.0) with a median duration of 30.9 months (IQR 12.0−75.3), despite 97% receiving pain treatment. Main sites affected were the limbs (62% upper/58% lower) and spine (41%). Main aetiologies were neuropathic low back pain (47%), post-surgical neuropathic pain (17%), and diabetic poly-neuropathy (12%). Thirty percent received a single analgesic (2% topical), while combinations comprised 43% systemic-systemic, 24% topical-systemic, 1% topical-topical. Medications included NSAIDs (45%), anticonvulsants (38%), WHO step 2 opioids (35%), and topical analgesics (27%). In the previous 6 months, 40% had switched treatment. The mean (SD) EQ-5D VAS score was 58 (22.3) and the mean (SD) EQ-5D summary score (UK tariff) was 0.62 (0.25). Patients had a CPSI mean index of 41/100, and sleeping pills were used by 33% of patients. The standardized prevalence of LNP by age and sex was 2.01% in the general population and 43.3% among chronic pain patients. Many LNP patients reported pain intensities of six on a ten-point scale in average for durations longer than 2.5 years, with quality of life and sleep performance affected, with frequent treatment combinations and switches, suggesting suboptimal pain management.</span>

medicine, general & internal, research & experimental
Pain management in German hospices: a cross-sectional study

Christian Volberg,Henning Schmidt-Semisch,Julian Maul,Jens Nadig,Martin Gschnell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01291-5

2024-01-05

BMC Palliative Care

Abstract:Pain management is a necessary component of palliative care as most patients suffer from pain during the final phase of life. Due to the complex causation of pain in the last phase of life, it is important to utilize methods other than pharmacotherapeutic options in order to achieve adequate pain control. As little is known about treatment of pain in German hospices, a nationwide survey was conducted.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
Comparison of Palliative Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Expectation of German Paramedics Between a Rural and an Urban Structured Emergency Medical Service Area

Daniel Chwallek,Adam Schweda,Martin Neukirchen,Joachim Risse,Jörg Hense,Martin Teufel,Mitra Tewes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08258597231221916

2024-02-21

Journal of Palliative Care

Abstract:Journal of Palliative Care, Ahead of Print. Objective(s)Differences in the German emergency medical service (EMS) can be seen in the countryside in contrast to the city with regard to travel distances to hospitals and in the access routes of EMS-physicians. In order to investigate the success of establishment of palliative crisis cards associated with training and the rural and urban EMS structures, two urban and two rural EMS areas were compared using the Paramedic Palliative Care Test (PARPACT). Methods: The PARPACT includes test items on palliative knowledge (PK, maximum score: 15 points) and palliative self-efficacy expectations (PSE, maximum score: 18 points), as well as items on palliative attitudes in dealing with palliative care patients. We used a 4-point Likert-type scale. For data analysis, nonparametric tests (χ-test and Mann–Whitney U test) were used in addition to descriptive analysis (frequencies, means, medians, standard deviations, and ranges). Results: In total, 291 out of 750 ambulance or EMS personnel participated in the voluntary survey. Rural ambulance or EMS personnel answered the PK-questions correctly more often on average (mean: 11.19, SD: 1.85) than urban ambulance or EMS personnel (mean: 9.18, SD: 2.39; Mann–Whitney U test: U=5040.000, P=.001). In addition, ambulance or EMS personnel with the highest level of training (3-year-trained paramedics) performed better in PK (mean: 10.38, SD: 2.31) than less intensively training ambulance or EMS personnel (mean: 9.58, SD: 2.43; Mann-Whitney U-test: U=8446.500, P=.004). In terms of PSE, rural ambulance or EMS personnel also achieved higher mean PSE-scores (mean: 12.55, SD: 2.60) than urban ambulance or EMS personnel (mean: 9.77, SD: 3.41; Mann-Whitney U-test: U=5148.500, P=.001). Conclusions: Better training in the EMS is associated with improved PK compared to less qualified nonphysician EMS staff. The establishment of palliative crisis cards and the structures in the city alone do not lead to improved knowledge and PSE.

public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services,health policy & services
[General practice care for patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A rapid review as part of the RELIEF project]

Regina Poß-Doering,Sabrina Keller,Marco Zugaj,Hanna Seidling,Cinara Paul,Regina Stolz,Petra Kaufmann-Kolle,Cornelia Straßner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2024.01.005

Abstract:Introduction: Approximately one fifth of the German population suffers from chronic pain, which is often associated with limitations in coping with everyday life, social isolation and psychological comorbidities such as anxiety and depression. The importance of a treatment approach that considers biological, psychological, and social factors (bio-psycho-social model) as well as non-drug interventions is emphasized in current guidelines, but presents challenges for primary care practices. To support the implementation of evidence-based best practice recommendations, the RELIEF project (Resource-oriented case management to implement recommendations for patients with chronic pain and frequent use of analgesics in general practices) aims to develop a case management program for the primary care of patients with chronic non-tumor pain. Methods: Prior to intervention development, a rapid review was conducted to identify best practice recommendations for the care of patients with chronic non-tumor pain, barriers and strategies to their implementation, and gaps in care in current guidelines and literature. Selective searches of guidelines, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, bibliographies of relevant publications, and the gray literature focused on assessment and monitoring, education, promotion of self-care, and rational pharmacotherapy. Results: Numerous recommendations on assessment and monitoring were identified, but only a few studies examined their feasibility in primary care practices. Guidelines contained few specific recommendations on content and format of patient education on chronic pain. Recommendations for non-drug self-care measures were mainly related to physical activity, relaxation techniques, behavioral therapy techniques and external applications. Especially for the area of physical activity, numerous barriers but also strategies for a successful implementation could be identified. Discussion: In a potential primary care model for patients with chronic non-tumor pain, pain assessment should aim to identify patients who need support in implementing medication and non-medication interventions in the primary care setting and/or could benefit from specialized care. To implement recommendations for pain education, primary care physicians need educational materials in a variety of formats and levels of detail that ideally could be processed by patients at home and then get addressed in practices using simple key questions. Non-drug measures should be an explicit part of the treatment plan. Conclusion: Many of the identified recommendations for the treatment of patients with chronic non-tumor pain can also be considered relevant for the primary care setting. Specific guidelines and concepts for primary care physicians that include setting-specific characteristics at the physician, patient, and system levels would be desirable for a successful implementation of these recommendations.
[Retrospective evaluation of electronically recorded patient questionnaires of a university outpatient pain clinic with the painDETECT® questionnaire]

N Foadi,I Winkelmann,M Rhein,M Karst

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00482-022-00677-3

Schmerz

Abstract:Background and objective: Psychometric tests can provide important information for diagnostics and progression in chronic pain patients. Between 2008 and 2018, the electronic system painDETECT® was used in the outpatient pain clinic of the Hannover Medical School (MHH). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the pain symptomatology data recorded using painDETECT® and the treatment procedures used in the patient cohort examined over a period of 15 months. Material and methods: A statistical analysis of baseline and follow-up data was performed. The analysis comprised pain-related parameters recorded by use of the painDETECT® system as well as outpatient records. Results: Baseline data of 459 patients (66% women) could be evaluated. The most common clinical pictures were spinal pain, headache, facial pain, and somatoform disorders, mostly with many years of previous treatment. Approximately 40% showed evidence of neuropathic pain components or central sensitization. With a mean pain intensity of VAS 6 (0-10), a predominantly high degree of chronicity was present. Approximately one third showed a high degree of pain-related functional impairment. Slightly more than half showed evidence of clinically relevant depression. Approximately 80% showed clinically relevant sleep disturbances. Follow-up data were available for 145 patients (31.6%). The proportion of patients receiving a nonpharmacological form of treatment increased by 44.1% (physical therapy) and by 24.1% (psychotherapeutic procedures) during the observation period. The use of co-analgesics increased by approximately 30% over the course. Conclusion: In the outpatient setting, an extension of treatment can be successful for high-grade chronic pain patients. Close structural networking with the clinics for rehabilitation medicine and for psychosomatics and psychotherapy at the MHH can be a favorable prerequisite for this.
The semantic focus of maternal speech: a comment on Ninio & Bruner (1978)

M. Goddard,K. Durkin,D. Rutter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900006322

IF: 2.7007

1985-02-01

Journal of Child Language

Abstract:Ninio & Bruner (1978) added an important dimension to the study of early lexical acquisition by drawing attention to the dialogue-like nature of the mother-child interactions where presumably much language-learning takes place. The authors pointed to the well-established findings that much of the child's early speech consists of names for people and objects (Leopold 1949, Werner & Kaplan 1963, Nelson 1973, Greenfield & Smith 1976). They went on to show that in one familiar type of parent–child interaction, joint picture-book reading, labels are used extensively by the adult and are inserted skilfully into a structured interactional sequence that has the texture of a dialogue (Ninio & Bruner 1978: 6). This dialogue, they suggested, ‘seems… to be a format well suited to the teaching of labelling’ (1978: 12). Subsequent research has also been interpreted as pointing to the teaching potential of joint picture-book reading (Wheeler 1983, Ninio 1983) and the opportunities it affords for situation-specific routines (Snow & Goldfield 1983).
Depression treatment in Germany – using claims data to compare a collaborative mental health care program to the general practitioner program and usual care in terms of guideline adherence and need-oriented access to psychotherapy

Alexander Engels,Hans-Helmut König,Julia Luise Magaard,Martin Härter,Sabine Hawighorst-Knapstein,Ariane Chaudhuri,Christian Brettschneider

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02995-1

IF: 4.144

2020-12-01

BMC Psychiatry

Abstract:Abstract Background Societies strive for fast-delivered, evidence-based and need-oriented depression treatment within budget constraints. To explore potential improvements, selective contracts can be implemented. Here, we evaluate if the German collaborative psychiatry-neurology-psychotherapy contract (PNP), which extends the gatekeeping-based general practitioner (GP) program, improved guideline adherence or need-oriented and timely access to psychotherapy compared to usual care (UC). Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study based on health insurance claims data. After we identified patients with depression who were on sick leave due to a mental disorder in 2015, we applied entropy balancing to adjust for selection effects and employed chi-squared tests to compare guideline adherence of the received treatment between PNP, the GP program and UC. Subsequently, we applied an extended cox regression to assess need-orientation by comparing the relationship between accumulated sick leave days and waiting times for psychotherapy across health plans. Results N = 23,245 patients were included. Regarding guideline adherence, we found no significant differences for most severity subgroups; except that patients with a first moderate depressive episode received antidepressants or psychotherapy more often in UC. Regarding need-orientation, we observed that the effect of each additional month of sick leave on the likelihood of starting psychotherapy was increased by 6% in PNP compared to UC. Irrespective of the health plan, we found that within the first 12 months only between 24.3 and 39.7% (depending on depression severity) received at least 10 psychotherapy sessions or adequate pharmacotherapy. Conclusions The PNP contract strengthens the relationship between sick leave days and the delay until the beginning of psychotherapy, which suggests improvements in terms of need-oriented access to care. However, we found no indication for increased guideline adherence and – independent of the health plan – a gap in sufficient utilization of adequate treatment options.

psychiatry
Multimodal Approaches in the Treatment of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathy—Evidence from Germany

Tobias Romeyke,Harald Stummer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010066

IF: 4.614

2024-01-08

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract:Patients with chronic peripheral neuropathy suffer greatly and their quality of life is often restricted. Drug therapy can be accompanied by undesirable side effects and intolerances, or the hoped-for effect does not materialize. Therefore, in addition to drug therapy, attempts are also made to treat the physical symptoms with complementary procedures. In the case of severe forms, the search for a suitable form of therapy is difficult. Complex treatments can be an innovative way to treat peripheral neuropathy. At the same time, several different therapy methods are carried out at high frequency by a specialized treatment team. This study aimed to provide an overview of possible complementary forms of therapy. The focus was on a comparison of two interdisciplinary complex therapies that are used in severe cases in an acute inpatient care setting in Germany. The six dimensions (energy, sleep, pain, physicality, emotional response and social isolation) of the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) were used to assess quality of life. Both complex treatments (naturopathic complex therapy/multimodal pain therapy) showed a significant reduction in impairment in all dimensions of the NHP. In addition, a multivariate analysis was carried out to take into account several influencing variables at the same time. At the time of admission to the hospital, the degree of chronicity was recorded for each patient. This allowed statements to be made about the effect of the respective therapy depending on the chronification stage of the patient. It has been shown that patients with acutely exacerbated pain with the highest degree of chronicity also benefit from both complex treatments. The naturopathic complex treatment gives the treatment team more options. Aspects such as nutrition, methods from phytotherapy and traditional Chinese medicine can be integrated into inpatient care. Thus, a patient-centered, holistic therapy can take place. However, an interdisciplinary holistic therapy requires more time for both the practitioner and the patient. This should be taken into account in the health systems in the context of the diagnosis related groups.

public, environmental & occupational health,environmental sciences
Exploring Referral and Service Utilization Patterns Within an Outpatient Interdisciplinary Pediatric Chronic Pain Program

Aimee K Hildenbrand,Christina M Amaro,Benjamin Bear,Catherine M Soprano,Katherine S Salamon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s430411

IF: 2.8319

2024-02-04

Journal of Pain Research

Abstract:Aimee K Hildenbrand, 1– 3 Christina M Amaro, 1, 4 Benjamin Bear, 1 Catherine M Soprano, 3, 5 Katherine S Salamon 2, 3 1 Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health, Wilmington, DE, USA; 2 Division of Behavioral Health, Nemours Children's Hospital Delaware, Wilmington, DE, USA; 3 Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 4 Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA; 5 Division of Diagnostic Referral, Nemours Children's Hospital Delaware, Wilmington, DE, USA Correspondence: Aimee K Hildenbrand, Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, 1600 Rockland Road, RC-1, Suite 160, Wilmington, DE, 19803, USA, Tel +1 302 298 7874, Email Purpose: We examine referral sources and clinical characteristics for youth presenting to an outpatient interdisciplinary pediatric chronic pain program. Patients and Methods: Referral data were extracted from the electronic health record. PROMIS Pediatric Anxiety and Pain Interference Scales were administered at an initial evaluation visit. Results: The program received 1488 referrals between 2016 and 2019, representing 1338 patients, with increasing volume of referrals over time. Referrals were primarily from orthopedics (19.6%), physical medicine and rehabilitation (18.8%), neurology (14.4%), and rheumatology (12.6%). Patients referred were primarily female (75.4%), White (80.1%), English-speaking (98.4%) adolescents (median=15.0 years). Of those referred, 732 (54.7%) attended an interdisciplinary evaluation (ie, with ≥ 2 disciplines). Adolescent anxiety was within the expected range by self-report (N=327, M T-score =55.67) and parent proxy-report (N=354, M T-score =57.70). Pain interference was moderately elevated by self-report (N=323, M T-score =61.52) and parent proxy-report (N=356, M T-score =64.02). There were no differences between patients referred who attended versus did not attend an interdisciplinary evaluation based on age, sex, ethnicity, or language. A smaller than expected proportion of referred Black patients (44%, P =0.02) and patients referred from orthopedics (40%) or pulmonology (11%) attended an evaluation, whereas a larger than expected proportion of those referred from physical medicine and rehabilitation (78%) were evaluated ( P < 0.001). Conclusion: Results highlight the demand for outpatient interdisciplinary pediatric chronic pain treatment. Findings can inform decisions related to staffing and service design for pediatric hospitals that aim to establish or grow outpatient pediatric chronic pain programs. Keywords: chronic pain, interdisciplinary, pediatric, referral, treatment Pediatric chronic pain is associated with increased risk for a wide range of functional impairments, including social difficulties, 1 sleep problems, 2 frequent school absences and decreased academic performance, 3–5 elevated anxiety and depressive symptoms, 6,7 and reduced quality of life. 8 Families of youth with chronic pain also experience negative effects including missed days of work and lost employment, 9 caregiving stress, 10 and impaired family functioning. 11 The financial burden of pediatric chronic pain on health-care systems is enormous, costing $19.5 billion dollars annually within the United States alone. 9 Youth with untreated or poorly managed chronic pain are likely to continue to experience chronic pain and related disability into adulthood. 6,12–17 In turn, chronic pain in adults results in an estimated economic burden of more than $600 billion each year because of health-care costs, lost work productivity, and disability programs. 18 Comprehensive treatment for pediatric chronic pain involves interdisciplinary teams of health-care providers from various specialties, including but not limited to medicine, psychology, physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychiatry, nutrition, social work, and alternative or integrative medicine (eg, acupuncture, massage, and yoga). 19 These providers work collaboratively with the patient and family to develop a treatment plan, often consisting of a combination of these services, with the ultimate goal of improving the youth's functioning. Research demonstrates the effectiveness of interdisciplinary chronic pain treatment approaches, including improvements in functioning and reductions in distress. 20–22 Interdisciplinary outpatient clinics are also a cost-effective approach for treating pediatric chronic pain. 23 Unfortunately, interdisc -Abstract Truncated-

clinical neurology
Towards Accurate Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue in Breast MRI Using Fuzzy C-Means and Skin-Folds Removal

M. Razavi,Lei Wang,A. Gubern-Mérida,Tetyana Ivanovska,H. Laue,N. Karssemeijer,H. Hahn

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23231-7_47

2015-09-07

Abstract:
Combined analysis of 3 cross-sectional surveys of pain in 14 countries in Europe, the Americas, Australia, and Asia: impact on physical and emotional aspects and quality of life

Martina Hagen,Taara Madhavan,John Bell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2020-0003

2020-06-03

Scandinavian Journal of Pain

Abstract:Abstract Background and aims Recognition of the biopsychosocial aspects of pain is important for a true understanding of the burden of pain and the necessity of pain management. Biopsychosocial aspects of pain may differ between countries and cultures. Market research methods can be well suited and effective for assessing patient perspectives of pain and biopsychosocial differences. We conducted and combined 3 cross-sectional, international surveys to document the impact of pain on physical and emotional aspects of life, as well as quality of life (QOL). Methods Online panelists from 24 countries took part in our surveys in 2014, 2016, and 2017. Fourteen countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, United Kingdom, United States, Mexico, Sweden, Saudi Arabia) contributed data in all 3 surveys and comprise the analysis population. A Global Pain Index (GPI) was constructed using 8 questions in 3 categories: Physical (frequency, duration, intensity of pain), Emotional (anxiety, impact on self-esteem, happiness), and Impact on QOL and ability to enjoy life. Each item was scored as the percentage of respondents meeting a prespecified threshold indicative of a substantial pain impact. Scores for the items within each category were averaged to obtain a category score, category scores were averaged to obtain a total score for each survey, and total scores from each survey were averaged to obtain a final combined score. Scores were assessed for the overall population, by individual countries, by age and gender, and by self-identified pain-treatment status (treat immediately, wait, never treat). Results Of the 50,952 adult respondents, 28,861 (56.6%) had ever experienced musculoskeletal pain; 50% of those with pain had pain with a multifaceted impact based on the GPI (Physical: 51%; Emotional: 40%; QOL Impact: 59%). Russia (57%) and Poland (56%) had the highest scores; Mexico (46%), Germany (47%), and Japan (47%) had the lowest. GPI score was higher in women (52%) than men (48%), and initially increased with age through age 54 (18‒24 years: 45%; 25‒34 years: 52%; 35‒44 years: 53%; 45‒54 years: 54%), after which it decreased again (55‒64 years: 51%; ≥65 years: 45%). A majority (65%) of respondents wait to treat their pain, whereas 21% treat their pain immediately and 14% never treat pain. The most common reason for waiting (asked in survey 3 only) was to avoid taking medication. Conclusions In this combined analysis of 3 international surveys using a novel biopsychosocial pain assessment tool, pain had a substantial impact on ~50% of respondents’ lives, spanning physical (51%), emotional (40%), and QOL effects (59%). Despite the substantial impact, a majority of patients tried to avoid treating their pain. Implications Clinicians should take a biopsychosocial approach to pain by asking patients not only about the presence and severity of pain, but the extent to which it affects various aspects of their lives and daily functioning. Patients may also need education about the efficacy and safety of available treatments for self-management of pain. The GPI may be a useful new tool for future studies of the biopsychosocial effects of pain in large populations.
Patient satisfaction in inpatient psychiatric treatment compared with inpatient equivalent home treatment in Germany: an in-depth qualitative study

Nele Adam,Melanie Neumann,Friedrich Edelhäuser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2023.1195614

2023-06-29

Frontiers in Health Services

Abstract:Background Inpatient treatment (IT) is the predominant form of psychiatric care in Germany and worldwide, whereby forms of psychiatric treatment have mainly evolved in the direction of home services. Inpatient equivalent home treatment (IEHT) is a new and additional pillar of psychiatric acute care provision legally embedded since 2018 in Germany. Objective The aim of this study was to conduct an in-depth exploration as little qualitative research has been performed so far in Germany to examine possible differences in patient satisfaction with IT compared with IEHT. Methods In the current qualitative study, N = 9 patients of a German hospital providing IT and IEHT were interviewed with the problem-centered interview. Inclusion criteria were IT or IT with subsequent IEHT. The theoretical sampling method was applied to select test persons in the research process. The experiences of the participants during their psychiatric treatment were analyzed using a qualitative content analysis. Results The results of both types of psychiatric treatment refer to different satisfaction factors during the treatment period. The function of fellow patients, the setting of the treatment, the conditions in place, and the relationship to relatives turn out to be pivotal for patient satisfaction. In addition, the quality of the therapy and relationship to caregivers itself can have an impact on patient satisfaction, particularly by shared decision making. During the IEHT, patient satisfaction can be strengthened by the possibility to handle daily tasks, to be close to relatives, while not so close to fellow patients, whereas IT patients are mostly satisfied because of the distance to their everyday life and the closeness to fellow patients. The choice of the form of psychiatric treatment according to the individual needs of the patients seems to be one key driver that can in turn increase patient satisfaction. In addition, a clean and hygienic environment seems to be critical for our respondents as a lack of it is one of the reasons to drop out of treatment. Conclusions Despite its limitations, this hypothesis-generating study is one of the first investigating German IEHT in comparison with IT in an in-depth qualitative approach contributing to a patient-oriented and cost-effective psychiatric treatment. Although hospitals are highly complex organizations and therefore not directly comparable, other German and international providers of IEHT may derive several generic success factors from this study for the development and improvement of patient satisfaction.

Effect of phosphate on the arginine-induced insulin release by the isolated perfused rat pancreas.

Pain after outpatient surgical procedures—a survey of 330 000 patients

Health-related quality of life among general practice patients with differing chronic diseases in Germany: Cross sectional survey

Integration of Complementary Medicine for Multilocal Chronic Pain: Treatment Results From the Patient Perspective

Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment

PAIN2.0: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of a 10-week outpatient interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy to manage recurrent pain for patients with risk factors of developing chronic pain in Germany

Prevalence of prehospital pain and pain assessment difference between patients and paramedics: a prospective cross-sectional observational study

[Interdisciplinary multimodal pain therapy: does the dose make a difference? : A comparison from routine clinical care]

Regional and patient-related factors influencing the willingness to use general practitioners as coordinators of the treatment in northern Germany - results of a cross-sectional observational study

Localised neuropathic pain in the primary care setting: a cross-sectional study of prevalence, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, quality of life and sleep performance

Pain management in German hospices: a cross-sectional study

Comparison of Palliative Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Expectation of German Paramedics Between a Rural and an Urban Structured Emergency Medical Service Area

[General practice care for patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A rapid review as part of the RELIEF project]

[Retrospective evaluation of electronically recorded patient questionnaires of a university outpatient pain clinic with the painDETECT® questionnaire]

The semantic focus of maternal speech: a comment on Ninio & Bruner (1978)

Depression treatment in Germany – using claims data to compare a collaborative mental health care program to the general practitioner program and usual care in terms of guideline adherence and need-oriented access to psychotherapy

Multimodal Approaches in the Treatment of Chronic Peripheral Neuropathy—Evidence from Germany

Exploring Referral and Service Utilization Patterns Within an Outpatient Interdisciplinary Pediatric Chronic Pain Program

Towards Accurate Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue in Breast MRI Using Fuzzy C-Means and Skin-Folds Removal

Combined analysis of 3 cross-sectional surveys of pain in 14 countries in Europe, the Americas, Australia, and Asia: impact on physical and emotional aspects and quality of life

Patient satisfaction in inpatient psychiatric treatment compared with inpatient equivalent home treatment in Germany: an in-depth qualitative study