Bite force transmission and mandible shape in grasshoppers, crickets, and allies is not driven by dietary niches

Carina Edel,Peter T Rühr,Melina Frenzel,Thomas van de Kamp,Tomáš Faragó,Jörg U Hammel,Fabian Wilde,Alexander Blanke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/evolut/qpae121
IF: 4.171
2024-09-18
Evolution
Abstract:Although species evolve in response to many intrinsic and extrinsic factors, frequently one factor has a dominating influence on a given organ system. In this context, mouthpart shape and function are thought to correlate strongly with dietary niche and this was advocated for decades, e.g., for insects. Orthoptera (grasshoppers, crickets, and allies) are a prominent case in this respect because mandible shape has been even used to predict feeding preferences. Here, we analysed mandible shape, force transmission efficiency, and their potential correlation with dietary categories in a phylogenetic framework for 153 extant Orthoptera. The mechanical advantage profile was used as a descriptor of gnathal edge shape and bite force transmission efficiency in order to understand how mandible shape is linked to biting efficiency and diet, and how these traits are influenced by phylogeny and allometry. Results show that mandible shape in fact is a poor predictor of feeding ecology and phylogenetic history has a strong influence on gnathal edge shape. Being ancestrally phytophagous, Orthoptera evolved in an environment with food sources being always abundant so that selective pressures leading to more specialized mouthpart shapes and force transmission efficiencies were low.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?