Abstract:Our knowledge of the anatomical organization of the human brain in health and disease draws heavily on the study of patients with focal brain lesions. Historically the first method of mapping brain function, it is still potentially the most powerful, establishing the necessity of any putative neural substrate for a given function or deficit. Great inferential power, however, carries a crucial vulnerability: without stronger alternatives any consistent error cannot be easily detected. A hitherto unexamined source of such error is the structure of the high-dimensional distribution of patterns of focal damage, especially in ischaemic injury-the commonest aetiology in lesion-deficit studies-where the anatomy is naturally shaped by the architecture of the vascular tree. This distribution is so complex that analysis of lesion data sets of conventional size cannot illuminate its structure, leaving us in the dark about the presence or absence of such error. To examine this crucial question we assembled the largest known set of focal brain lesions (n = 581), derived from unselected patients with acute ischaemic injury (mean age = 62.3 years, standard deviation = 17.8, male:female ratio = 0.547), visualized with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, and processed with validated automated lesion segmentation routines. High-dimensional analysis of this data revealed a hidden bias within the multivariate patterns of damage that will consistently distort lesion-deficit maps, displacing inferred critical regions from their true locations, in a manner opaque to replication. Quantifying the size of this mislocalization demonstrates that past lesion-deficit relationships estimated with conventional inferential methodology are likely to be significantly displaced, by a magnitude dependent on the unknown underlying lesion-deficit relationship itself. Past studies therefore cannot be retrospectively corrected, except by new knowledge that would render them redundant. Positively, we show that novel machine learning techniques employing high-dimensional inference can nonetheless accurately converge on the true locus. We conclude that current inferences about human brain function and deficits based on lesion mapping must be re-evaluated with methodology that adequately captures the high-dimensional structure of lesion data.

Localisation of function in the brain: a rethink

Related Studies and Clinical Application of Brain's Functional Localization (review)

Issues in localization of brain function: The case of lateralized frontal cortex in cognition, emotion, and psychopathology

How Do We Connect Brain Areas with Cognitive Functions? The Past, the Present and the Future

System neuroscience: Past, present, and future

Beyond modularity: Fine-scale mechanisms and rules for brain network reconfiguration

Structural and Functional Brain Networks: From Connections to Cognition

Mapping how local perturbations influence systems-level brain dynamics

Brain topography beyond parcellations: Local gradients of functional maps

Against cortical reorganisation

The Correlation Theory of Brain Function

MULTIMODAL GRADIENTS UNIFY LOCAL AND GLOBAL CORTICAL ORGANIZATION

The return of the lesion for localization and therapy

A novel brain partition highlights the modular skeleton shared by structure and function

Representation and identity - convergence of brain research and mind-brain philosophy

Functional brain networks: great expectations, hard times, and the big leap forward

The maps problem and the mapping problem: two challenges for a cognitive neuroscience of speech and language

Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI

Criticality in the brain: A synthesis of neurobiology, models and cognition

Functional brain modules reconfigure at multiple scales across the human lifespan

Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped