Early Language Screening and Improved Developmental Outcomes
Ann P. Kaiser,Jason C. Chow,Jennifer E. Baumingham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.54529
2024-01-24
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:Early language development is the foundation for communication, social relationships, reading, academic accomplishments, job performance, and other life-long indicators of positive social development and economic success. Early detection of significant delays in language development and effective intervention, when needed, are essential to ensuring optimal developmental outcomes. Estimates of primary language delays in children younger than 5 years vary widely, ranging from less than 5% to nearly 20%, depending on the age of the child, the inclusion of speech and/or language criteria, the specific measures used, and the criteria for identification of significant delays. 1 -4 Given that only 30% of children younger than 5 years are screened when their primary caregivers or teachers do not express concerns about their speech or language development and only 50% of children eligible for intervention are reported to receive interventions, there is a need for contemporary evidence-based guidance on the potential positive and negative outcomes of screening. Although there are documented associations of early speech and language delays with subsequent poor academic, social, and behavioral outcomes, 5 ,6 evidence linking screening to effective interventions and subsequent improvements in long-term developmental outcomes is limited. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendation statement concluded that "the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for speech and language delay and disorders in children age 5 years or younger" (I statement). 7 ,8 No studies specifically examining the risks and benefits of screening vs no screening were identified. 7 ,8 The reports by the UPSTF 7 and Feltner et al 8 reviewed a total of 38 studies of screening and intervention meeting stringent inclusion criteria for methodological quality and outcomes. In this editorial, we highlight several secondary contributions of the USPSFT recommendations, 7 ,8 suggest additions that might enhance the impact of the recommendations, and make suggestions for research and policy, with particular emphasis on the role of parents as collaborators in screening and intervention. In addition to the overall recommendation, 7 ,8 the USPSTF makes several important contributions to understanding the "Gordian knot" linking speech and language screening to improved long-term developmental outcomes. First, the mean incidence of primary speech and language delays was 16% across 21 studies enrolling 7489 children younger than 5 years. 7 ,8 There was considerable variability in reported incidence by study, screening measure, language constructs (eg, specific vs global language skills), and informant (eg, parent vs clinician). This variability is important; however, the mean incidence level reported across studies suggests early screening would detect a significant number of children. Second, overall sensitivity and specificity data indicated that early delays in specific language skills and articulation can be detected with available screening instruments used by parents or clinicians. 7 ,8 Again, variability across screening instruments, speech and language constructs, and informants was noted; however, several screening tools appeared promising for immediate practice and candidates for future research studies. Third, across all components of the synthesis, there was evidence that parents were essential partners in screening and effective intervention delivery. 7 ,8 For example, parent reports of specific child language skills were precise, with high levels of sensitivity and specificity similar to examiner levels but with less variability. Most studies in which parents were trained to deliver interventions to their children reported positive outcomes for some measures. Positive outcomes were associated with longer parent implementation. These results, 7 ,8 when paired with meta-analysis of parent-implemented interventions across populations of young children with language impairment, 9 -11 support the use of parent-implemented interventions to improve language outcomes. In the USPSTF analysis of contextual factors impacting screening, 7 ,8 parent characteristics (eg, socioeconomic status, single parent status, social isolation, primary language other than English) were associated with participation in screening and intervention. These findings suggest that parents may be gatekeepers for their children's access to a range of supports for language development. 12 The associations between these indicated parent characteristics and expected disparities in health care access deserve notice -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal