Quality of life of women with a screen-detected versus clinically detected breast cancer in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study

Abyan Irzaldy,Johannes D M Otten,Lindy M Kregting,Dieuwke R Mink van der Molen,Helena M Verkooijen,Nicolien T van Ravesteyn,Eveline A M Heijnsdijk,Annemiek Doeksen,Carmen C van der Pol,Daniel J Evers,Miranda F Ernst,Ida J Korfage,Harry J de Koning,Mireille J M Broeders
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03783-0
2024-09-17
Abstract:Purpose: Breast cancer (BC) screening enables early detection of BC, which may lead to improved quality of life (QoL). We aim to compare QoL between women with a screen-detected and clinically detected BC in the Netherlands. Methods: We used data from the 'Utrecht cohort for Multiple BREast cancer intervention studies and Long-term evaluation' (UMBRELLA) between October 2013 and March 2022. Patients were categorized as screen-detected or clinically detected. We analysed three questionnaires, namely EORTC QLQ C-30, BR23, and HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) completed by BC patients shortly after diagnosis (T1) and one-year after treatment (T2). Independent t-tests were performed to compare QoL average differences between the two groups. Bonferroni-corrected p-value significance threshold of 0.00057 was used. The magnitude of differences was calculated using Cohen's d. The clinical relevance of QLQ-C30 differences was assessed based on interpretation guideline of EORTC-QLQ-C30 results. Results: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 691 women with screen-detected BC and 480 with clinically detected BC. Generally, screen-detected BC patients reported a better QoL. At T1, their average QLQ-C30 summary score was higher (86.1) than clinically detected BC patients (83.0) (p < 0.0001). Cohen's d for all items ranged between 0.00 and 0.39. A few QLQ-C30 score differences were clinically relevant, indicating better outcomes in emotional functioning, general health, constipation, and fatigue for women with screen-detected BC. Conclusions: In the Netherlands, women with screen-detected BC reported statistically significant and better QoL than women with clinically detected BC. However, clinical relevance of the differences is limited.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?