Abstract:Background Low back pain (LBP) is the most common occupational disorder in North America. In the period from 2012 to 2016, indirect costs were US$2.2 billion for LBP in Brazil, accounting for approximately 67% of medical expenses. Previously published studies lacked major interventions, requiring further research to improve the evidence. Findings from this review can raise awareness among clinicians and promote significant savings if they follow clinical guidelines. Objectives To investigate the effectiveness of implementation strategies to reduce the proportion of low-value care and increase the proportion of high-value care in the management of low back pain. Methods This review was registered to the to the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/7jfpr/). Searches were performed in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Clinical trials investigating the effect of evidence-in-practice implementation strategies on reducing low-value care and promoting low-value care were included. Studies including adults with non-specific LBP were considered eligible. The primary outcome of this systematic review was outcomes related to the practices of health professionals. However, the primary outcomes were determined considering two recent clinical care standards. Meta-analyses were calculated using random effect models, the risk of bias by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the overall quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Results Thirty-two articles were included. Interventions focusing on implementing clinical guidelines were not effective in referral to specialists (5 studies, n=6223; RR=0.88; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.25), referral to physical therapists (3 studies, n=7937; RR=1.42 ; 95% CI: 0.74, 2.72) or for prescribing non-opioid drugs (6 studies, n=7297; RR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.10) when compared to the control group. However, the implementation of clinical guidelines was effective in reducing the number of imaging requests (12 studies, n= 44,689; RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.99), opioid prescription (5 studies, n=6681; RR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.80), and promote active approaches (exercise, counseling, etc.) (6 studies, n=2553; RR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.76). Confidence of all meta-analyses was low, as most studies were assessed at high risk of bias because they were not randomized clinical trials and because of serious inconsistency (I2 > 50%). Conclusion Although clinical guidelines are important to improve the quality of care for people with LBP, it is not always effective in clinical practice. The quality of evidence found was low. Better quality studies are still needed to confirm these findings. Implications Clinical guidelines are important tools that are effective in reducing imaging, prescribing opioids and promoting active approaches and were ineffective for referrals and prescribing non-opioids.

[Who Guideline for Non-Surgical Management of Chronic Primary Low Back Pain in Adults in Primary and Community Care Settings]

A critical view of WHO guidelines on management of low back pain

The Global Spine Care Initiative: applying evidence-based guidelines on the non-invasive management of back and neck pain to low- and middle-income communities

Acute low back pain: Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention: WFNS spine committee recommendations

Clinical practice guidelines for the noninvasive management of low back pain: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration

Best practice care for acute low back pain: A new clinical standard to assist general practitioners

Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison

National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy

Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society

Umbrella Review of Primary Care Treatments for Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain

Evidence‐based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: A systematic review of guidelines

Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review for an American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis Based on Current Evidence.

Systematic Review to Inform a World Health Organization (WHO) Clinical Practice Guideline: Benefits and Harms of Structured and Standardized Education or Advice for Chronic Primary low back pain in Adults

[General practice care for patients with chronic non-cancer pain: A rapid review as part of the RELIEF project]

A user-friendly clinical practice guideline summary for managing low back pain in South Africa

Clinical care standards for the management of low back pain: a scoping review

Clinical Examination, Diagnosis, and Conservative Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review

EFFECTIVENESS OF IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES TO REDUCE THE PROPORTION OF LOW-COST CARE FOR LOW-BACK PAIN MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS

Personalized assessment and management of non‐specific low back pain

Common Clinical Practice for Low Back Pain Treatment: A Modified Delphi Study