MIP3α-Rel Mtb intranasal DNA vaccination induces reactive T-cell infiltration into the lungs in mice and macaques

James T Gordy,Jean J Zheng,Amanda R Maxwell,Alannah D Taylor,Styliani Karanika,Rowan E Bates,Heemee Ton,Jacob Meza,Yangchen Li,Jiaqi Zhang,Petros C Karakousis,Richard B Markham
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.04.611263
2024-09-08
bioRxiv
Abstract:Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), is the leading cause of mortality due to a single infectious organism. While generally curable, TB requires a lengthy and complex antibiotic regimen, due in large part to bacteria that can shift to a persistent state in the presence of antibiotic pressure. Rel Mtb is the primary enzyme regulating the stringent response, which contributes to the metabolic shift of Mtb to a persistent state. Targeting Rel Mtb with a vaccine to eliminate persistent bacteria through the induction of Rel Mtb -specific T-cell immunity in combination with antibiotics to kill dividing bacteria has shown promise in model systems. In a mouse model of Mtb infection, a vaccine created by genetically fusing rel Mtb to the chemokine macrophage inflammatory protein 3α ( MIP3 α), a ligand for the CC chemokine receptor type 6 (CCR6) present on immature dendritic cells, has been shown to enhance T-cell responses and accelerate eradication of infection in mouse models compared to a vaccine lacking the chemokine component. In this study, immunogenicity studies in the mouse and rhesus macaque models provide evidence that intranasal administrations of the DNA form of the MipRel vaccine led to enhanced lung infiltration of T cells after a series of immunizations. Furthermore, despite similar T-cell immunity seen in PBMCs between MipRel and Rel vaccinations, lung and bronchoalveolar lavage cell samples are more enriched for cytokine-secreting T cells in MipRel groups compared to Rel groups. We conclude that intranasal immunization with a MIP-3α fusion vaccine represents a novel strategy for use of a simple DNA vaccine formulation to elicit T-cell immune responses within the respiratory tract. That this formulation is immunogenic in a non-human primate model historically viewed as poorly responsive to DNA vaccines indicates the potential for clinical application in the treatment of Mtb infection, with possible application to other respiratory pathogens. Future studies will further characterize the protective effect of this vaccination platform.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?