Expanding the spectrum of low‐grade sinonasal adenocarcinoma with biphasic seromucinous differentiation and activating HRAS/AKT1 mutations
Viktoria S Hadnagy,Meike Körner,Matthias Rössle,Patrick Dubach,Gunther Pabst,Alexandra Kotulova,Stefan Weder,Robert Seifert,Elisabeth J Rushing,David Holzmann,Martin Hüllner,Sandra N Freiberger,Niels J Rupp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/his.15251
2024-06-26
Histopathology
Abstract:This work characterises four similar cases of low‐grade biphasic sinonasal adenocarcinoma harbouring activating HRAS mutations. Despite morphological and molecular overlaps with epithelial–myoepithelial carcinoma of the salivary glands, several arguments favour a distinct tumour entity originating from local seromucinous glands, i.e. a sinonasal biphasic seromucinous adenocarcinoma. Aims Low‐grade non‐intestinal‐type sinonasal adenocarcinoma (LGSNAC) is a rare heterogeneous and poorly characterised group of tumours, distinct from intestinal‐ and salivary‐type neoplasms. Therefore, further characterisation is needed for clearer biological understanding and classification. Methods and results Clinical, histological and molecular characterisation of four cases of biphasic, low‐grade adenocarcinomas of the sinonasal tract was performed. All patients were male, aged between 48 and 78 years, who presented with polypoid masses in the nasal cavity. Microscopically, virtually all tumours were dominated by tubulo‐glandular biphasic patterns, microcystic, focal (micro)papillary, oncocytic or basaloid features. Immunohistochemical staining confirmed biphasic differentiation with an outer layer of myoepithelial cells. Molecular profiling revealed HRAS (p.G13R, p.Q61R) mutations, and concomitant AKT1 (p.E17K, p.Q79R) mutations in two cases. Two cases showed potential in‐situ/precursor lesions adjacent to the tumour. Follow‐up periods ranged from 1 to 30 months, with one case relapsing locally after 12 and > 20 years. Conclusion This study further corroborates a distinct biphasic low‐grade neoplasm of the sinonasal tract with seromucinous differentiation. Although morphological and molecular features overlap with salivary gland epithelial–myoepithelial carcinoma, several arguments favour categorising these tumours within the spectrum of LGSNAC.
pathology,cell biology